Classification of systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features using two different sets of criteria.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Gabriela Martinez-Zayas, David Karp, Traci N Adams, Elena K Joerns
{"title":"Classification of systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features using two different sets of criteria.","authors":"Gabriela Martinez-Zayas, David Karp, Traci N Adams, Elena K Joerns","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2025.101206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) describes patients with interstitial lung disease and autoimmunity who do not meet classification criteria for a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to determine whether the criteria developed by the European Alliance of Association of Rheumatology and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) would classify more patients with IPAF as SLE, than those developed by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC). Increasing the recognition of SLE among patients with IPAF may affect therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study included consecutive patients initially classified as having IPAF between December 2005-August 2019. We reviewed patients' charts to assess whether more patients met SLE criteria by SLICC or EULAR/ACR methodology. Fisher's exact test assessed the significance of the difference in the proportion of patients classified by the two criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 201 patients initially classified as IPAF. Twelve were identified as SLE by SLICC criteria and 23 by EULAR/ACR criteria. All but three patients with lymphopenia who met SLE criteria by SLICC also met it by EULAR/ACR. The difference in the proportion of IPAF patients meeting SLE criteria by the two methods was statistically significant (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with IPAF were classified as SLE more frequently using EULAR/ACR criteria than by SLICC criteria. The EULAR/ACR criteria may be superior for SLE classification in patients with ILD. Patients with IPAF and SLE features should undergo full work-up to evaluate for SLE classification as it may affect therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"88 ","pages":"101206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmer.2025.101206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) describes patients with interstitial lung disease and autoimmunity who do not meet classification criteria for a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to determine whether the criteria developed by the European Alliance of Association of Rheumatology and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) would classify more patients with IPAF as SLE, than those developed by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC). Increasing the recognition of SLE among patients with IPAF may affect therapy.

Methods: This observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study included consecutive patients initially classified as having IPAF between December 2005-August 2019. We reviewed patients' charts to assess whether more patients met SLE criteria by SLICC or EULAR/ACR methodology. Fisher's exact test assessed the significance of the difference in the proportion of patients classified by the two criteria.

Results: We included 201 patients initially classified as IPAF. Twelve were identified as SLE by SLICC criteria and 23 by EULAR/ACR criteria. All but three patients with lymphopenia who met SLE criteria by SLICC also met it by EULAR/ACR. The difference in the proportion of IPAF patients meeting SLE criteria by the two methods was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Patients with IPAF were classified as SLE more frequently using EULAR/ACR criteria than by SLICC criteria. The EULAR/ACR criteria may be superior for SLE classification in patients with ILD. Patients with IPAF and SLE features should undergo full work-up to evaluate for SLE classification as it may affect therapy.

两套不同标准对具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎患者系统性红斑狼疮的分类
目的:具有自身免疫性特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF)描述了不符合系统性自身免疫性风湿病(包括系统性红斑狼疮(SLE))分类标准的间质性肺疾病和自身免疫患者。我们的目的是确定由欧洲风湿病协会联盟和美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)制定的标准是否会比由系统性狼疮国际合作诊所(SLICC)制定的标准将更多的IPAF患者分类为SLE。提高IPAF患者对SLE的认识可能会影响治疗。方法:这项观察性、回顾性、单中心队列研究纳入了2005年12月至2019年8月期间最初被分类为IPAF的连续患者。我们回顾了患者的图表,以评估是否有更多的患者符合SLICC或EULAR/ACR方法的SLE标准。Fisher的精确检验评估了按两种标准分类的患者比例差异的显著性。结果:我们纳入了201例初始分类为IPAF的患者。12例根据SLICC标准确诊为SLE, 23例根据EULAR/ACR标准确诊为SLE。除3例淋巴细胞减少患者外,所有通过SLICC达到SLE标准的患者也通过EULAR/ACR达到SLE标准。两种方法IPAF患者符合SLE标准的比例差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:与SLICC标准相比,EULAR/ACR标准更频繁地将IPAF患者分类为SLE。对于ILD患者的SLE分类,EULAR/ACR标准可能更优。具有IPAF和SLE特征的患者应进行全面检查以评估SLE的分类,因为它可能影响治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信