Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Pleural Effusion Classification Methods in Cats: An Analysis of Naturally Occurring Cases.

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A Mazzei, F Busato, G Marceglia, A Zoia
{"title":"Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Pleural Effusion Classification Methods in Cats: An Analysis of Naturally Occurring Cases.","authors":"A Mazzei, F Busato, G Marceglia, A Zoia","doi":"10.1111/vcp.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pleural effusion (PE) in cats can result from transudative or exudative processes. Transudates are caused by decreased colloid osmotic pressure (↓COP) or elevated hydrostatic pressure (↑HP) gradient, while exudates arise from increased pleural capillary permeability. Diagnostic classification approaches traditionally rely on pleural effusion total protein (TP<sub>PE</sub>) and total nucleated cell counts (TNCC<sub>PE</sub>). In contrast, Light's criteria employing pleural effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDH<sub>PE</sub>), LDH<sub>PE</sub> divided by serum LDH (LDH<sub>ratio</sub>), and pleural effusion to serum protein ratio (TP<sub>ratio</sub>) are more accurate than classification based on TP<sub>PE</sub>/TNCC<sub>PE</sub> in humans and show promise in cats.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of TNCC<sub>PE</sub>, LDH<sub>PE</sub>, LDH<sub>ratio</sub>, TP<sub>PE</sub>, and TP<sub>ratio</sub> in classifying feline PEs in ↑HP-transudates, ↓COP-transudates, or exudates and to compare simplified Light's criteria (which relies solely on LDH<sub>PE</sub>) with Light's criteria and existing veterinary classification schemes based on TP<sub>PE</sub> and TNCC<sub>PE</sub> (named Vet-A and Vet-B).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study including 83 client-owned cats with PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 55 exudates, 28 ↑HP-transudates, and 0 ↓COP-transudates. All the variables analyzed were significantly different between exudates and transudates. Simplified Light's criteria correctly classified 50/55 exudates and 26/28 ↑HP-transudates (sensitivity = 91%, specificity = 93%, accuracy = 92%). Light's criteria correctly identified 55/55 exudates but misclassified 15/28 ↑HP-transudates as exudates (accuracy = 82%). Traditional veterinary schemes showed lower accuracies: Vet-A (57%) and Vet-B (74%). Simplified Light's criteria outperformed Vet-A (p < 0.001) and Vet-B (p = 0.007) and trended higher than Light's criteria (p = 0.096).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simplified Light's criteria demonstrate excellent diagnostic accuracy, outperforming traditional veterinary classification schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23593,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.70059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pleural effusion (PE) in cats can result from transudative or exudative processes. Transudates are caused by decreased colloid osmotic pressure (↓COP) or elevated hydrostatic pressure (↑HP) gradient, while exudates arise from increased pleural capillary permeability. Diagnostic classification approaches traditionally rely on pleural effusion total protein (TPPE) and total nucleated cell counts (TNCCPE). In contrast, Light's criteria employing pleural effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDHPE), LDHPE divided by serum LDH (LDHratio), and pleural effusion to serum protein ratio (TPratio) are more accurate than classification based on TPPE/TNCCPE in humans and show promise in cats.

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of TNCCPE, LDHPE, LDHratio, TPPE, and TPratio in classifying feline PEs in ↑HP-transudates, ↓COP-transudates, or exudates and to compare simplified Light's criteria (which relies solely on LDHPE) with Light's criteria and existing veterinary classification schemes based on TPPE and TNCCPE (named Vet-A and Vet-B).

Methods: Cross-sectional study including 83 client-owned cats with PE.

Results: There were 55 exudates, 28 ↑HP-transudates, and 0 ↓COP-transudates. All the variables analyzed were significantly different between exudates and transudates. Simplified Light's criteria correctly classified 50/55 exudates and 26/28 ↑HP-transudates (sensitivity = 91%, specificity = 93%, accuracy = 92%). Light's criteria correctly identified 55/55 exudates but misclassified 15/28 ↑HP-transudates as exudates (accuracy = 82%). Traditional veterinary schemes showed lower accuracies: Vet-A (57%) and Vet-B (74%). Simplified Light's criteria outperformed Vet-A (p < 0.001) and Vet-B (p = 0.007) and trended higher than Light's criteria (p = 0.096).

Conclusions: Simplified Light's criteria demonstrate excellent diagnostic accuracy, outperforming traditional veterinary classification schemes.

猫胸膜积液分类方法诊断准确性的比较:自然病例分析。
背景:猫的胸腔积液(PE)可由渗出或渗出过程引起。渗出液是由胶体渗透压(↓COP)降低或流体静压(↑HP)梯度升高引起的,而渗出液是由胸膜毛细血管渗透性增加引起的。传统的诊断分类方法依赖于胸腔积液总蛋白(TPPE)和总有核细胞计数(TNCCPE)。相比之下,Light采用胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶(LDHPE)、LDHPE除以血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDHratio)和胸腔积液与血清蛋白比(TPratio)的标准在人类中比基于TPPE/TNCCPE的分类更准确,在猫中也更有希望。目的:评估TNCCPE、LDHPE、LDHratio、TPPE和TPratio对↑hp -trans、↓cop -trans或渗出物中猫pe的诊断准确性,并将简化的Light标准(仅依赖LDHPE)与Light标准以及基于TPPE和TNCCPE的现有兽医分类方案(命名为Vet-A和Vet-B)进行比较。方法:横断面研究,包括83只客户拥有的PE猫。结果:渗出物55例,hp -转体28例,cop -转体0例。分析的所有变量在渗出液和渗出液之间均有显著差异。简化光标准正确分类50/55渗出物和26/28↑hp -渗出物(灵敏度= 91%,特异性= 93%,准确性= 92%)。Light的标准正确识别了55/55渗出物,但错误地将15/28↑hp -渗出物分类为渗出物(准确率为82%)。传统兽医方案的准确率较低:Vet-A(57%)和Vet-B(74%)。Simplified Light的诊断标准优于Vet-A (p)结论:Simplified Light的诊断标准具有出色的诊断准确性,优于传统的兽医分类方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary clinical pathology
Veterinary clinical pathology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
133
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Clinical Pathology is the official journal of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) and the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ESVCP). The journal''s mission is to provide an international forum for communication and discussion of scientific investigations and new developments that advance the art and science of laboratory diagnosis in animals. Veterinary Clinical Pathology welcomes original experimental research and clinical contributions involving domestic, laboratory, avian, and wildlife species in the areas of hematology, hemostasis, immunopathology, clinical chemistry, cytopathology, surgical pathology, toxicology, endocrinology, laboratory and analytical techniques, instrumentation, quality assurance, and clinical pathology education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信