Between sound and sleep: a perspective on Sonic Sleep Aids.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf275
Jessica Vazzaz, Faith Matcham, Marcos Economides, Kate Cavanagh
{"title":"Between sound and sleep: a perspective on Sonic Sleep Aids.","authors":"Jessica Vazzaz, Faith Matcham, Marcos Economides, Kate Cavanagh","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep disturbances are prevalent in the general population, coinciding with a surge in the availability and use of digital sleep aids. Among these, standalone audio-based tools, termed Sonic Sleep Aids (SSA), such as sleep music, ambient sounds, bedtime stories, and sleep skills (e.g. guided meditation, positive psychology techniques), have gained popularity. This perspective piece examines the phenomenon of SSA by discussing the existing evidence and highlighting the different levels of empirical support across SSA types. Music-based relaxation has demonstrated efficacy in improving sleep quality, whereas findings on ambient sounds (e.g. white, pink noise) are inconclusive. Empirical support for narrated content as a sleep aid remains limited. Guided practices like mindfulness and self-compassion show potential, yet further research is needed to support their effectiveness, particularly when limited to bedtime practice. In the broader context, the widespread use of app-based SSA raises questions about their alignment with sleep hygiene recommendations, which typically discourage bedtime screen use. This concern is compounded by a paucity of randomized controlled trials testing their effectiveness against well-matched controls, alongside the risk of increased dependency on technology and altered relationships with rest and introspection. Against these concerns, potential benefits include accessibility and reduced reliance on pharmacological aids. A research agenda is proposed to investigate the efficacy of digitally delivered SSA in naturalistic settings, their mechanisms of action, and their impact across different populations. Understanding these factors is crucial to determine whether SSA serve as beneficial tools or divert individuals from more effective, evidence-based approaches to sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep disturbances are prevalent in the general population, coinciding with a surge in the availability and use of digital sleep aids. Among these, standalone audio-based tools, termed Sonic Sleep Aids (SSA), such as sleep music, ambient sounds, bedtime stories, and sleep skills (e.g. guided meditation, positive psychology techniques), have gained popularity. This perspective piece examines the phenomenon of SSA by discussing the existing evidence and highlighting the different levels of empirical support across SSA types. Music-based relaxation has demonstrated efficacy in improving sleep quality, whereas findings on ambient sounds (e.g. white, pink noise) are inconclusive. Empirical support for narrated content as a sleep aid remains limited. Guided practices like mindfulness and self-compassion show potential, yet further research is needed to support their effectiveness, particularly when limited to bedtime practice. In the broader context, the widespread use of app-based SSA raises questions about their alignment with sleep hygiene recommendations, which typically discourage bedtime screen use. This concern is compounded by a paucity of randomized controlled trials testing their effectiveness against well-matched controls, alongside the risk of increased dependency on technology and altered relationships with rest and introspection. Against these concerns, potential benefits include accessibility and reduced reliance on pharmacological aids. A research agenda is proposed to investigate the efficacy of digitally delivered SSA in naturalistic settings, their mechanisms of action, and their impact across different populations. Understanding these factors is crucial to determine whether SSA serve as beneficial tools or divert individuals from more effective, evidence-based approaches to sleep.

在声音和睡眠之间:对声波睡眠辅助的看法。
睡眠障碍在普通人群中普遍存在,与此同时,数字睡眠辅助设备的可用性和使用也在激增。其中,被称为声波睡眠辅助(SSA)的独立音频工具,如睡眠音乐、环境声音、睡前故事和睡眠技巧(如引导冥想、积极心理学技巧),已经越来越受欢迎。这篇透视文章通过讨论现有证据和强调不同类型的SSA的不同水平的经验支持来检查SSA现象。以音乐为基础的放松已被证明对改善睡眠质量有效,而对环境声音(如白噪音、粉红噪音)的研究结果尚无定论。叙述性内容作为睡眠辅助的经验支持仍然有限。像正念和自我同情这样的指导性练习显示出潜力,但需要进一步的研究来支持它们的有效性,特别是当仅限于睡前练习时。在更广泛的背景下,基于应用程序的SSA的广泛使用引发了人们对它们是否符合睡眠卫生建议的质疑,这些建议通常不鼓励睡前使用屏幕。缺乏随机对照试验来测试它们在匹配良好的对照下的有效性,以及对技术的依赖增加、与休息和自省的关系改变的风险,加剧了这种担忧。与这些担忧相反,潜在的好处包括可获得性和减少对药物辅助的依赖。提出了一项研究议程,以调查数字交付的SSA在自然环境中的功效、其作用机制以及对不同人群的影响。了解这些因素对于确定SSA是作为一种有益的工具,还是使个体偏离更有效的、基于证据的睡眠方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信