Investigating the Pre-Implementation Facilitators and Barriers of the Implementation of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) Intervention in Canadian Cancer Centers.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sophie Lebel, Alanna Chu, Florence Gourgues, Emma Kearns, America Prudent, Ghizlène Sehabi, Yasmine W Sehabi, Sara Beattie, Sheila N Garland, Cheryl Harris, Jennifer Jones, Christine Maheu, Jacqueline L Bender, Andrea Feldstain, Josée Savard, Robin Urquhart, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Claudia Hernandez, Linda E Carlson
{"title":"Investigating the Pre-Implementation Facilitators and Barriers of the Implementation of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) Intervention in Canadian Cancer Centers.","authors":"Sophie Lebel, Alanna Chu, Florence Gourgues, Emma Kearns, America Prudent, Ghizlène Sehabi, Yasmine W Sehabi, Sara Beattie, Sheila N Garland, Cheryl Harris, Jennifer Jones, Christine Maheu, Jacqueline L Bender, Andrea Feldstain, Josée Savard, Robin Urquhart, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Claudia Hernandez, Linda E Carlson","doi":"10.1002/pon.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is the number one unmet psychosocial need of cancer survivors. Fortunately, several interventions have demonstrated their efficacy in reducing FCR in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) intervention, a 6-week, cognitive-existential group therapy. However, few interventions are implemented in routine clinical care. The present study aims to document pre-implementation facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of clinicians and decision-makers to prepare the implementation of FORT in Canadian cancer centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods comparative case study evaluated the process of implementing FORT in 5 Canadian clinical sites. Prior to implementation, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with clinicians and decision-makers at each site, based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to uncover barriers and facilitators of implementation. Content analysis was performed on the interviews using the NVivo template provided by the CFIR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 20 managers/decision-makers and clinicians who reported facilitators common to all sites: (1) an awareness of the need for an FCR intervention; (2) the perceived benefit of FORT's group format to reduce waitlists for individual FCR services; and (3) that offering an evidence-based intervention was within the mission of their institution. All sites identified staff shortage and concerns for equitable access to FORT as the main barriers. Each site had additional unique barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of facilitators and barriers will directly contribute to the selection of site-specific strategies and tools to optimize the implementation of FORT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 10","pages":"e70293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is the number one unmet psychosocial need of cancer survivors. Fortunately, several interventions have demonstrated their efficacy in reducing FCR in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) intervention, a 6-week, cognitive-existential group therapy. However, few interventions are implemented in routine clinical care. The present study aims to document pre-implementation facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of clinicians and decision-makers to prepare the implementation of FORT in Canadian cancer centers.

Methods: This mixed-methods comparative case study evaluated the process of implementing FORT in 5 Canadian clinical sites. Prior to implementation, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with clinicians and decision-makers at each site, based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to uncover barriers and facilitators of implementation. Content analysis was performed on the interviews using the NVivo template provided by the CFIR.

Results: We interviewed 20 managers/decision-makers and clinicians who reported facilitators common to all sites: (1) an awareness of the need for an FCR intervention; (2) the perceived benefit of FORT's group format to reduce waitlists for individual FCR services; and (3) that offering an evidence-based intervention was within the mission of their institution. All sites identified staff shortage and concerns for equitable access to FORT as the main barriers. Each site had additional unique barriers.

Conclusion: This analysis of facilitators and barriers will directly contribute to the selection of site-specific strategies and tools to optimize the implementation of FORT.

调查加拿大癌症中心实施复发恐惧治疗(FORT)干预的实施前促进因素和障碍。
目的:对癌症复发的恐惧(FCR)是癌症幸存者未满足的头号心理社会需求。幸运的是,在随机对照试验(RCTs)中,一些干预措施已经证明了它们在降低FCR方面的有效性,包括复发恐惧治疗(FORT)干预,一种为期6周的认知存在性团体治疗。然而,在常规临床护理中很少实施干预措施。本研究旨在从临床医生和决策者的角度记录实施前的促进因素和障碍,以准备在加拿大癌症中心实施FORT。方法:这个混合方法比较案例研究评估了在加拿大5个临床地点实施FORT的过程。在实施之前,我们根据实施研究的综合框架(CFIR),对每个地点的临床医生和决策者进行了单独的半结构化访谈,以发现实施的障碍和促进因素。使用CFIR提供的NVivo模板对访谈进行内容分析。结果:我们采访了20位管理者/决策者和临床医生,他们报告了所有站点共同的促进因素:(1)意识到需要FCR干预;(2) FORT的分组形式对减少个人FCR服务的等待名单的感知效益;(3)提供基于证据的干预是他们机构的使命。所有场址都确定工作人员短缺和对公平使用FORT的关切是主要障碍。每个站点都有额外的独特屏障。结论:对促进因素和障碍因素的分析将直接有助于选择特定地点的策略和工具来优化FORT的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信