Cognitive Resources and the Engagement of the Precuneus During Irony Processing.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Elizabeth Valles-Capetillo, Magda Giordano, Rajesh K Kana
{"title":"Cognitive Resources and the Engagement of the Precuneus During Irony Processing.","authors":"Elizabeth Valles-Capetillo, Magda Giordano, Rajesh K Kana","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irony is often considered one of the most complex forms of verbal communication and can serve as an important indicator of communication abilities. An ironic statement conveys a meaning that is the opposite of its literal interpretation. The cognitive processes presumed to be involved in interpreting irony include Theory of Mind (ToM), executive functions, and processing style. At the neural level, processing irony has been associated with activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), precuneus, and inferior parietal lobule, among others. The objective of this study was to examine the cognitive processes and the neural correlates of processing irony in Mexican adults using a novel task designed for Spanish-speaking individuals. A total of 45 participants completed a cognitive assessment and performed a contextual discrepancy task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. With the lowest classification accuracy and the slowest response times, the results showed processing irony to be challenging. As expected, processing irony engaged brain regions primarily associated with ToM (e.g., precuneus) and language processing (e.g., IFG and pSTG). In contrast, the identification of literal and unrelated statements activated motor-related areas. Interestingly, no differential activation was found for the processing of white lies. Furthermore, regression models indicated that processing statements within a given context-whether ironic, unrelated, white lies, or literal-engaged cognitive domains related to executive functions, perceptual processing, and social cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 10","pages":"e70162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irony is often considered one of the most complex forms of verbal communication and can serve as an important indicator of communication abilities. An ironic statement conveys a meaning that is the opposite of its literal interpretation. The cognitive processes presumed to be involved in interpreting irony include Theory of Mind (ToM), executive functions, and processing style. At the neural level, processing irony has been associated with activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), precuneus, and inferior parietal lobule, among others. The objective of this study was to examine the cognitive processes and the neural correlates of processing irony in Mexican adults using a novel task designed for Spanish-speaking individuals. A total of 45 participants completed a cognitive assessment and performed a contextual discrepancy task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. With the lowest classification accuracy and the slowest response times, the results showed processing irony to be challenging. As expected, processing irony engaged brain regions primarily associated with ToM (e.g., precuneus) and language processing (e.g., IFG and pSTG). In contrast, the identification of literal and unrelated statements activated motor-related areas. Interestingly, no differential activation was found for the processing of white lies. Furthermore, regression models indicated that processing statements within a given context-whether ironic, unrelated, white lies, or literal-engaged cognitive domains related to executive functions, perceptual processing, and social cognition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

反语加工中的认知资源与楔前叶的参与。
反讽通常被认为是语言交际中最复杂的形式之一,可以作为沟通能力的重要指标。讽刺的语句所传达的意思与其字面解释相反。反语的认知过程包括心理理论、执行功能和加工方式。在神经水平上,反语加工与内侧前额叶皮层、额下回(IFG)、颞后上回(pSTG)、楔前叶和顶叶下小叶等的活动有关。本研究的目的是通过一项为讲西班牙语的个体设计的新任务,研究墨西哥成年人加工反语的认知过程和神经相关关系。共有45名参与者在接受功能性磁共振成像的同时完成了认知评估和情境差异任务。在分类准确率最低和响应时间最慢的情况下,结果表明处理讽刺语是具有挑战性的。正如预期的那样,处理反语主要涉及与ToM(如楔前叶)和语言处理(如IFG和pSTG)相关的大脑区域。相反,对文字和不相关陈述的识别激活了运动相关区域。有趣的是,在处理善意谎言时没有发现不同的激活。此外,回归模型表明,在给定的语境中处理语句——无论是讽刺的、无关的、善意的谎言,还是字面意思——涉及与执行功能、知觉加工和社会认知相关的认知领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信