Neonatal resuscitation for bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm)-an alternate approach using an ovine model.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Mausma Bawa, Sylvia Gugino, Justin Helman, Nicole Bradley, Lori Nielsen, Arun Prasath, Clariss Blanco, Munmun Rawat, Praveen Chandrasekharan
{"title":"Neonatal resuscitation for bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm)-an alternate approach using an ovine model.","authors":"Mausma Bawa, Sylvia Gugino, Justin Helman, Nicole Bradley, Lori Nielsen, Arun Prasath, Clariss Blanco, Munmun Rawat, Praveen Chandrasekharan","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04444-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommends initiating chest compressions (CC) in newborns when heart rate (HR) is <60 beats per minute (bpm) after 30 s of effective positive pressure ventilation (PPV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Near-term lambs with asphyxia induced bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) were randomized to: (i) control (n = 6)- Resuscitation per current Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) (ii) study (n = 6)-PPV continued until HR = 0, only then CC with PPV were administered in a ratio of 3:1 until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Outcomes included timing, incidence of ROSC, CC requirement, blood gases, and peak coronary, carotid, and pulmonary blood flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to achieve ROSC was not different between groups (3 ± 2 min vs. 1.6 ± 1 min in study (p = 0.17). Only 1/6 lambs in study group required CC versus 6/6 in control group (p = 0.015). At ROSC, the study group had significantly lower arterial PaCO2 (47 ± 5 mmHg vs. 94 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.01) and higher arterial PaO<sub>2</sub> (148 ± 53 mmHg vs. 54 ± 12 mmHg, p < 0.01). The asynchronous external CC in the control group contributed to the loss of inherent cardiac activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prioritizing ventilation during bradycardia reduced need for CC, facilitated faster ROSC, and improved gas exchange in an ovine model.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Prioritizing ventilation over chest compressions beyond 30 s for bradycardia during neonatal resuscitation improves outcomes, reducing the need for chest compressions and accelerating the time to return of spontaneous circulation. Pulseless electrical activity occurs before complete cardiac arrest. Focusing on initiating chest compressions at a specific heart rate will distract providers from prioritizing ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04444-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommends initiating chest compressions (CC) in newborns when heart rate (HR) is <60 beats per minute (bpm) after 30 s of effective positive pressure ventilation (PPV).

Methods: Near-term lambs with asphyxia induced bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) were randomized to: (i) control (n = 6)- Resuscitation per current Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) (ii) study (n = 6)-PPV continued until HR = 0, only then CC with PPV were administered in a ratio of 3:1 until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Outcomes included timing, incidence of ROSC, CC requirement, blood gases, and peak coronary, carotid, and pulmonary blood flow.

Results: The time to achieve ROSC was not different between groups (3 ± 2 min vs. 1.6 ± 1 min in study (p = 0.17). Only 1/6 lambs in study group required CC versus 6/6 in control group (p = 0.015). At ROSC, the study group had significantly lower arterial PaCO2 (47 ± 5 mmHg vs. 94 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.01) and higher arterial PaO2 (148 ± 53 mmHg vs. 54 ± 12 mmHg, p < 0.01). The asynchronous external CC in the control group contributed to the loss of inherent cardiac activity.

Conclusion: Prioritizing ventilation during bradycardia reduced need for CC, facilitated faster ROSC, and improved gas exchange in an ovine model.

Impact: Prioritizing ventilation over chest compressions beyond 30 s for bradycardia during neonatal resuscitation improves outcomes, reducing the need for chest compressions and accelerating the time to return of spontaneous circulation. Pulseless electrical activity occurs before complete cardiac arrest. Focusing on initiating chest compressions at a specific heart rate will distract providers from prioritizing ventilation.

心动过缓(心率< 60 bpm)的新生儿复苏-使用羊模型的替代方法。
背景:国际复苏联络委员会建议在新生儿心率(HR)低于正常时启动胸外按压(CC)。方法:近期羔羊窒息性心动过缓(HR)结果:两组间达到ROSC的时间无差异(研究中为3±2分钟vs. 1.6±1分钟(p = 0.17)。研究组只有1/6的羔羊需要CC,对照组为6/6 (p = 0.015)。在ROSC时,研究组动脉PaCO2显著降低(47±5 mmHg vs. 94±18 mmHg, p_2显著降低(148±53 mmHg vs. 54±12 mmHg)。结论:在心动过缓时优先通气减少了CC的需要,促进了ROSC的加快,并改善了羊模型中的气体交换。影响:在新生儿复苏过程中,对于超过30秒的心动过缓,优先考虑通气而不是胸外按压,可以改善结果,减少胸外按压的需要,加快自然循环恢复的时间。无脉电活动发生在完全心脏骤停之前。专注于在特定心率下启动胸外按压会分散提供者对通气的优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信