Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Cosmetic Outcomes After Precision Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Maria Reyes-Matos, Lena M Turkheimer, Chris A Campbell, Shayna L Showalter
{"title":"Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Cosmetic Outcomes After Precision Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy.","authors":"Maria Reyes-Matos, Lena M Turkheimer, Chris A Campbell, Shayna L Showalter","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Precision Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (PB-IORT) is a novel form of IORT that combines computed tomography-guided treatment planning with high-dose-rate brachytherapy to deliver individualized radiation that spares the skin and chest wall. We analyzed cosmetic outcomes following PB-IORT as scored by breast clinicians, a plastic surgeon, and patients, and assessed the interrater reliability between the scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a phase II clinical trial, the study cohort included 357 patients treated with PB-IORT who had up to 24 mo of follow-up data. At each follow-up visit, the patient, plastic surgeon, and breast clinicians completed the Harvard Cosmesis Scale and a survey that evaluates changes in breast pigmentation, shape, and size. Interrater agreement was assessed using Kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 24 mo, 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.77, 92.61) of patients rated their cosmesis as \"excellent\" or \"good' with the Harvard Cosmesis Scale; 93.7% (95% CI: 90.80, 96.14) and 80.3% (95% CI: 75.08, 85.50) of patients were rated similarly by the breast clinicians and the plastic surgeon, respectively. There was minimal agreement between patients, breast clinicians, and the plastic surgeon for all variables (Kappa <0.40). Breast clinicians rated cosmesis the most favorably.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PB-IORT delivers a single, high dose of radiation without compromising cosmetic outcomes. Cosmetic outcome scores from patients, breast clinicians, and the plastic surgeon had low interrater reliability. The patient's perspective is paramount when assessing cosmetic outcomes after breast surgery. We advocate that future studies include patient-reported outcomes as the primary means of evaluating cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"315 ","pages":"210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.09.029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Precision Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (PB-IORT) is a novel form of IORT that combines computed tomography-guided treatment planning with high-dose-rate brachytherapy to deliver individualized radiation that spares the skin and chest wall. We analyzed cosmetic outcomes following PB-IORT as scored by breast clinicians, a plastic surgeon, and patients, and assessed the interrater reliability between the scores.

Methods: As part of a phase II clinical trial, the study cohort included 357 patients treated with PB-IORT who had up to 24 mo of follow-up data. At each follow-up visit, the patient, plastic surgeon, and breast clinicians completed the Harvard Cosmesis Scale and a survey that evaluates changes in breast pigmentation, shape, and size. Interrater agreement was assessed using Kappa statistics.

Results: At 24 mo, 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.77, 92.61) of patients rated their cosmesis as "excellent" or "good' with the Harvard Cosmesis Scale; 93.7% (95% CI: 90.80, 96.14) and 80.3% (95% CI: 75.08, 85.50) of patients were rated similarly by the breast clinicians and the plastic surgeon, respectively. There was minimal agreement between patients, breast clinicians, and the plastic surgeon for all variables (Kappa <0.40). Breast clinicians rated cosmesis the most favorably.

Conclusions: PB-IORT delivers a single, high dose of radiation without compromising cosmetic outcomes. Cosmetic outcome scores from patients, breast clinicians, and the plastic surgeon had low interrater reliability. The patient's perspective is paramount when assessing cosmetic outcomes after breast surgery. We advocate that future studies include patient-reported outcomes as the primary means of evaluating cosmetic outcomes.

情人眼里出西施:精准乳房术中放射治疗后的美容效果。
简介:精确乳房术中放射治疗(PB-IORT)是一种新型的IORT,它将计算机断层扫描引导的治疗计划与高剂量率的近距离放射治疗相结合,提供个体化的放射治疗,避免皮肤和胸壁的损伤。我们分析了乳房临床医生、整形外科医生和患者对PB-IORT评分后的美容结果,并评估了评分之间的互译信度。方法:作为II期临床试验的一部分,研究队列包括357例接受PB-IORT治疗的患者,他们有长达24个月的随访数据。在每次随访中,患者、整形外科医生和乳房临床医生完成哈佛美容量表和一份评估乳房色素沉着、形状和大小变化的调查。采用Kappa统计方法评估评价者间的一致性。结果:在24个月时,88.7%(95%可信区间[CI]: 84.77, 92.61)的患者用哈佛美容量表将其美容评定为“优秀”或“良好”;93.7% (95% CI: 90.80, 96.14)和80.3% (95% CI: 75.08, 85.50)的患者分别被乳腺临床医生和整形外科医生评价相似。在所有变量上,患者、乳房临床医生和整形外科医生之间存在最小的一致性(Kappa结论:PB-IORT提供单次高剂量辐射,而不会影响美容效果)。来自患者、乳房临床医生和整形外科医生的美容结果评分具有较低的间信度。在评估乳房手术后的美容效果时,患者的观点是最重要的。我们提倡未来的研究将患者报告的结果作为评估美容结果的主要手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信