Reliability assessment of the malay version visual comfort questionnaire for schoolchildren with visual impairment.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0333228
Pui Theng Yong, Zainora Mohammed, Norliza Mohamad Fadzil, Mohd Harimi Abd Rahman, Mohd Izzuddin Hairol, Sumithira Narayanasamy
{"title":"Reliability assessment of the malay version visual comfort questionnaire for schoolchildren with visual impairment.","authors":"Pui Theng Yong, Zainora Mohammed, Norliza Mohamad Fadzil, Mohd Harimi Abd Rahman, Mohd Izzuddin Hairol, Sumithira Narayanasamy","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0333228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lighting adjustments are crucial in vision rehabilitation to enhance visual function and promote visual comfort. However, there is a lack of validated questionnaires to assess lighting needs among schoolchildren with visual impairment. Given the limited knowledge of their specific need for reading and learning activities, a translated and reliable instrument is essential for guiding evidence-based support. This study aims to translate, adapt, and assess face validity, content validity and reliability of the Malay version Visual Comfort Questionnaire (VCQ-M). This is a cross-sectional study that was carried out from November 2022 to January 2023. Forward-backwards translation was used to translate the items in the questionnaire from English into Malay. Face and content validity of the translated questionnaire were determined to ensure comprehensibility and cultural adaptability. Ten normal-sighted adults participated in face validation. Five optometrists were recruited as expert panels to rate the questionnaire items. The inter-rater reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa and the inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC). To determine the internal consistency of VCQ-M, 42 subjects with visual impairment from a special secondary school were recruited in this study to complete the VCQ-M after reading a paragraph comprised of 50 words under lighting of 125 lux. Internal consistency of VCQ-M was analysed using Cronbach's alpha with composite reliability for confirmation. The face validity showed 91.0% of overall agreement, while the content validity index for the item was above 0.80 at item-level and scale-level. The translated VCQ-M has acceptable Fleiss' Kappa inter-rater reliability for relevance (κ = 0.54) and comprehensibility (κ = 0.44), as well as ICC inter-rater reliability for relevance (ICC(3, 5) = 0.88) and comprehensibility (ICC(3, 5) = 0.73). The Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.92) showed acceptable internal consistency and confirmed with Dijkstra-Henseler's rho (ρA = 0.95) and Jöreskog's rho (ρc = 0.94). The VCQ-M shows an acceptable face validity index, content validity index, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. This study represents a first-stage validation focused on internal consistency. Construct validity was not assessed, and thus the psychometric evaluation is partial and preliminary. However, the findings support using VCQ-M as a reliable and valid questionnaire to assess visual comfort among Malay-speaking schoolchildren with visual impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0333228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lighting adjustments are crucial in vision rehabilitation to enhance visual function and promote visual comfort. However, there is a lack of validated questionnaires to assess lighting needs among schoolchildren with visual impairment. Given the limited knowledge of their specific need for reading and learning activities, a translated and reliable instrument is essential for guiding evidence-based support. This study aims to translate, adapt, and assess face validity, content validity and reliability of the Malay version Visual Comfort Questionnaire (VCQ-M). This is a cross-sectional study that was carried out from November 2022 to January 2023. Forward-backwards translation was used to translate the items in the questionnaire from English into Malay. Face and content validity of the translated questionnaire were determined to ensure comprehensibility and cultural adaptability. Ten normal-sighted adults participated in face validation. Five optometrists were recruited as expert panels to rate the questionnaire items. The inter-rater reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa and the inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC). To determine the internal consistency of VCQ-M, 42 subjects with visual impairment from a special secondary school were recruited in this study to complete the VCQ-M after reading a paragraph comprised of 50 words under lighting of 125 lux. Internal consistency of VCQ-M was analysed using Cronbach's alpha with composite reliability for confirmation. The face validity showed 91.0% of overall agreement, while the content validity index for the item was above 0.80 at item-level and scale-level. The translated VCQ-M has acceptable Fleiss' Kappa inter-rater reliability for relevance (κ = 0.54) and comprehensibility (κ = 0.44), as well as ICC inter-rater reliability for relevance (ICC(3, 5) = 0.88) and comprehensibility (ICC(3, 5) = 0.73). The Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.92) showed acceptable internal consistency and confirmed with Dijkstra-Henseler's rho (ρA = 0.95) and Jöreskog's rho (ρc = 0.94). The VCQ-M shows an acceptable face validity index, content validity index, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. This study represents a first-stage validation focused on internal consistency. Construct validity was not assessed, and thus the psychometric evaluation is partial and preliminary. However, the findings support using VCQ-M as a reliable and valid questionnaire to assess visual comfort among Malay-speaking schoolchildren with visual impairment.

马来文版学童视觉舒适问卷的信度评估。
照明调节在视力康复中起着至关重要的作用,可以增强视觉功能,促进视觉舒适。然而,缺乏有效的问卷来评估视力受损学童的照明需求。鉴于他们对阅读和学习活动的具体需求了解有限,一份翻译的、可靠的文书对于指导循证支持至关重要。本研究旨在翻译、改编马来文版视觉舒适问卷(VCQ-M),并评估其面孔效度、内容效度和信度。这是一项横断面研究,从2022年11月到2023年1月进行。使用正向倒译法将问卷中的条目从英语翻译成马来语。确定翻译问卷的面孔效度和内容效度,以确保可理解性和文化适应性。10名视力正常的成年人参加了面部验证。聘请五名验光师作为专家小组对问卷项目进行评分。采用Fleiss’Kappa法和类间相关系数(inter-class correlation coefficient, ICC)对问卷的级间信度进行评估。为了确定VCQ-M的内部一致性,本研究从一所特殊中学招募了42名视力障碍受试者,在125勒克斯的照明下阅读一段50字的段落后完成VCQ-M。采用Cronbach's alpha分析VCQ-M的内部一致性,采用复合信度进行验证。面效度为91.0%,项目和量表的内容效度指数均在0.80以上。翻译后的VCQ-M具有可接受的Fleiss’Kappa相关性间信度(κ = 0.54)和可理解性(κ = 0.44),以及ICC相关性间信度(ICC(3,5) = 0.88)和可理解性(ICC(3,5) = 0.73)。Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.92)具有良好的内部一致性,并与Dijkstra-Henseler’s rho (ρA = 0.95)和Jöreskog’s rho (ρc = 0.94)相吻合。VCQ-M量表具有较好的面部效度指标、内容效度指标、量表间信度指标和内部一致性指标。本研究代表了内部一致性的第一阶段验证。构念效度没有被评估,因此心理测量的评估是局部的和初步的。然而,本研究结果支持使用VCQ-M问卷来评估马来语学童的视觉舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信