Self-Management Therapies for Temporomandibular Disorders-Evidence From Systematic Reviews.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tessa Bijelic, Ambrosina Michelotti, Rosaria Bucci, Daniela Del Sorbo, EwaCarin Ekberg, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson
{"title":"Self-Management Therapies for Temporomandibular Disorders-Evidence From Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Tessa Bijelic, Ambrosina Michelotti, Rosaria Bucci, Daniela Del Sorbo, EwaCarin Ekberg, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson","doi":"10.1111/joor.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain in the orofacial region affects 10%-15% of the general population. It is most often related to temporomandibular disorders (TMD): pain in the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joints. Managing chronic pain conditions requires a biopsychosocial, evidence-based and patient-centred approach. Accordingly, self-management has been advocated for TMD. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate existing evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) on self-management therapy for TMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA and PRIOR guidelines, with a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42021276856). PubMed, Scopus, LILACS and the Cochrane Library were searched until December 1st 2023 to identify SRs that evaluated self-management for TMD. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, performed full-text assessments, extracted all data and performed risk of bias assessment with AMSTAR 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1740 studies were identified. After title and abstract screening, 399 studies underwent full-text assessment and 11 SRs comprising 49 unique primary studies were included. Of these, six SRs reported favorable results for self-management for TMD, whereas five reported insufficient evidence either for or against the use of self-management compared to other interventions. The overlap of primary studies between the SRs was 53%, and the main evidence gaps were related to quality of life and adverse effects outcomes. The methodological shortcomings of the SRs primarily stem from insufficient primary-study design criteria or not providing references for excluded studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing evidence generally suggests beneficial effects from self-management strategies such as patient education, behavioural therapy and jaw exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain in the orofacial region affects 10%-15% of the general population. It is most often related to temporomandibular disorders (TMD): pain in the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joints. Managing chronic pain conditions requires a biopsychosocial, evidence-based and patient-centred approach. Accordingly, self-management has been advocated for TMD. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate existing evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) on self-management therapy for TMD.

Methods: The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA and PRIOR guidelines, with a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42021276856). PubMed, Scopus, LILACS and the Cochrane Library were searched until December 1st 2023 to identify SRs that evaluated self-management for TMD. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, performed full-text assessments, extracted all data and performed risk of bias assessment with AMSTAR 2.

Results: A total of 1740 studies were identified. After title and abstract screening, 399 studies underwent full-text assessment and 11 SRs comprising 49 unique primary studies were included. Of these, six SRs reported favorable results for self-management for TMD, whereas five reported insufficient evidence either for or against the use of self-management compared to other interventions. The overlap of primary studies between the SRs was 53%, and the main evidence gaps were related to quality of life and adverse effects outcomes. The methodological shortcomings of the SRs primarily stem from insufficient primary-study design criteria or not providing references for excluded studies.

Conclusions: Existing evidence generally suggests beneficial effects from self-management strategies such as patient education, behavioural therapy and jaw exercises.

颞下颌疾病的自我管理疗法——来自系统评价的证据。
目的:口腔面区慢性疼痛影响10%-15%的普通人群。它最常与颞下颌紊乱(TMD)有关:咀嚼肌和颞下颌关节疼痛。管理慢性疼痛状况需要一种生物心理社会、循证和以患者为中心的方法。因此,TMD提倡自我管理。本综述旨在评价系统评价(SRs)中关于TMD自我管理治疗的现有证据。方法:按照PRISMA和PRIOR指南进行审查,采用预注册方案(PROSPERO CRD42021276856)。检索PubMed, Scopus, LILACS和Cochrane图书馆,直到2023年12月1日,以确定评估TMD自我管理的sr。两名独立审稿人筛选标题和摘要,进行全文评估,提取所有数据,并使用AMSTAR 2进行偏倚风险评估。结果:共纳入1740项研究。在标题和摘要筛选后,399项研究进行了全文评估,包括49项独特的主要研究在内的11项SRs被纳入。其中,6个srr报告了TMD自我管理的有利结果,而5个报告了与其他干预措施相比,支持或反对使用自我管理的证据不足。SRs之间的初步研究重叠率为53%,主要证据缺口与生活质量和不良反应结局有关。SRs的方法学缺陷主要源于不充分的初步研究设计标准或未为被排除的研究提供参考。结论:现有证据普遍表明,自我管理策略如患者教育、行为治疗和颌部锻炼是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信