{"title":"Self-Management Therapies for Temporomandibular Disorders-Evidence From Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Tessa Bijelic, Ambrosina Michelotti, Rosaria Bucci, Daniela Del Sorbo, EwaCarin Ekberg, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson","doi":"10.1111/joor.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain in the orofacial region affects 10%-15% of the general population. It is most often related to temporomandibular disorders (TMD): pain in the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joints. Managing chronic pain conditions requires a biopsychosocial, evidence-based and patient-centred approach. Accordingly, self-management has been advocated for TMD. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate existing evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) on self-management therapy for TMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA and PRIOR guidelines, with a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42021276856). PubMed, Scopus, LILACS and the Cochrane Library were searched until December 1st 2023 to identify SRs that evaluated self-management for TMD. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, performed full-text assessments, extracted all data and performed risk of bias assessment with AMSTAR 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1740 studies were identified. After title and abstract screening, 399 studies underwent full-text assessment and 11 SRs comprising 49 unique primary studies were included. Of these, six SRs reported favorable results for self-management for TMD, whereas five reported insufficient evidence either for or against the use of self-management compared to other interventions. The overlap of primary studies between the SRs was 53%, and the main evidence gaps were related to quality of life and adverse effects outcomes. The methodological shortcomings of the SRs primarily stem from insufficient primary-study design criteria or not providing references for excluded studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing evidence generally suggests beneficial effects from self-management strategies such as patient education, behavioural therapy and jaw exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Chronic pain in the orofacial region affects 10%-15% of the general population. It is most often related to temporomandibular disorders (TMD): pain in the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joints. Managing chronic pain conditions requires a biopsychosocial, evidence-based and patient-centred approach. Accordingly, self-management has been advocated for TMD. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate existing evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) on self-management therapy for TMD.
Methods: The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA and PRIOR guidelines, with a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42021276856). PubMed, Scopus, LILACS and the Cochrane Library were searched until December 1st 2023 to identify SRs that evaluated self-management for TMD. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, performed full-text assessments, extracted all data and performed risk of bias assessment with AMSTAR 2.
Results: A total of 1740 studies were identified. After title and abstract screening, 399 studies underwent full-text assessment and 11 SRs comprising 49 unique primary studies were included. Of these, six SRs reported favorable results for self-management for TMD, whereas five reported insufficient evidence either for or against the use of self-management compared to other interventions. The overlap of primary studies between the SRs was 53%, and the main evidence gaps were related to quality of life and adverse effects outcomes. The methodological shortcomings of the SRs primarily stem from insufficient primary-study design criteria or not providing references for excluded studies.
Conclusions: Existing evidence generally suggests beneficial effects from self-management strategies such as patient education, behavioural therapy and jaw exercises.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.