Comparative analysis of kVCT- and MVCT-guided helical tomotherapy for total body irradiation: evaluation of process times and residual setup errors.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Yuta Omi, Ryuichi Yada, Tatsuya Hasegawa, Ken Shishido, Keita Sakai, Tomotaka Kinoshita, Katsumasa Nakamura, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Arisa Takeuchi
{"title":"Comparative analysis of kVCT- and MVCT-guided helical tomotherapy for total body irradiation: evaluation of process times and residual setup errors.","authors":"Yuta Omi, Ryuichi Yada, Tatsuya Hasegawa, Ken Shishido, Keita Sakai, Tomotaka Kinoshita, Katsumasa Nakamura, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Arisa Takeuchi","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Helical tomotherapy-based total body irradiation (TBI) traditionally employs megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) for image-guided setup; however, its 390 mm field of view (FOV) and long acquisition times constrain workflow efficiency and whole-body alignment. This study evaluated whether a newly implemented whole-body fan-beam kilovoltage CT (kVCT; 500 mm FOV) can streamline this process. In a retrospective study involving 14 patients treated with a Radixact X9 system (September 2021-September 2023), we timed the patient setup, imaging, registration, re-setup, and beam delivery for each upper-body (UB) and lower-body (LB) segment. Residual setup errors were measured along the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes. The kVCT shortened the initial setup cycle (setup + imaging + registration) from 25.4 ± 4.6 to 15.9 ± 3.3 min for UB and from 14.5 ± 3.8 to 9.4 ± 2.4 min for LB (P < 0.001 for both). The total fraction time, including delivery time, decreased from 71.8 ± 7.5 to 56.7 ± 5.3 min. When residual errors exceeded 5 mm, the additional time required for a second cycle was nearly halved with kVCT (7.3 vs. 14.3 min for UB; 4.8 vs. 8.2 min for LB). The kVCT maintained mean absolute residual errors below 2 mm in all axes, and every 95th-percentile value remained within the 5 mm tolerance recommended for tomotherapy-based TBI. These time savings are expected to reduce intrafraction motion and staff workload. Overall, whole-body kVCT enables faster, comprehensive image guidance while preserving accuracy, thereby streamlining tomotherapy-based TBI and reducing the burden on patients and clinical staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Helical tomotherapy-based total body irradiation (TBI) traditionally employs megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) for image-guided setup; however, its 390 mm field of view (FOV) and long acquisition times constrain workflow efficiency and whole-body alignment. This study evaluated whether a newly implemented whole-body fan-beam kilovoltage CT (kVCT; 500 mm FOV) can streamline this process. In a retrospective study involving 14 patients treated with a Radixact X9 system (September 2021-September 2023), we timed the patient setup, imaging, registration, re-setup, and beam delivery for each upper-body (UB) and lower-body (LB) segment. Residual setup errors were measured along the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes. The kVCT shortened the initial setup cycle (setup + imaging + registration) from 25.4 ± 4.6 to 15.9 ± 3.3 min for UB and from 14.5 ± 3.8 to 9.4 ± 2.4 min for LB (P < 0.001 for both). The total fraction time, including delivery time, decreased from 71.8 ± 7.5 to 56.7 ± 5.3 min. When residual errors exceeded 5 mm, the additional time required for a second cycle was nearly halved with kVCT (7.3 vs. 14.3 min for UB; 4.8 vs. 8.2 min for LB). The kVCT maintained mean absolute residual errors below 2 mm in all axes, and every 95th-percentile value remained within the 5 mm tolerance recommended for tomotherapy-based TBI. These time savings are expected to reduce intrafraction motion and staff workload. Overall, whole-body kVCT enables faster, comprehensive image guidance while preserving accuracy, thereby streamlining tomotherapy-based TBI and reducing the burden on patients and clinical staff.

kVCT和mvct引导下的全身照射螺旋断层治疗的比较分析:过程时间和剩余设置误差的评估。
基于螺旋断层治疗的全身照射(TBI)传统上采用超电压计算机断层扫描(MVCT)进行图像引导设置;然而,其390毫米的视场(FOV)和较长的采集时间限制了工作效率和全身对齐。本研究评估了新实施的全身扇束千电压CT (kVCT; 500 mm FOV)是否可以简化这一过程。在一项回顾性研究中,包括14名接受Radixact X9系统治疗的患者(2021年9月- 2023年9月),我们对每个上半身(UB)和下半身(LB)节段的患者设置、成像、注册、重新设置和光束传递进行了定时。沿横向、纵向和垂直轴测量残余设置误差。kVCT缩短了初始设置周期(设置+成像+配准),UB从25.4±4.6分钟缩短到15.9±3.3分钟,LB从14.5±3.8分钟缩短到9.4±2.4分钟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信