A multi-level framework for advancing digital health equity in learning health systems: aligning practice and theory with the Quintuple Aim.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pavani Rangachari, Khadija Al Arkoubi, Rajaa Shindi
{"title":"A multi-level framework for advancing digital health equity in learning health systems: aligning practice and theory with the Quintuple Aim.","authors":"Pavani Rangachari, Khadija Al Arkoubi, Rajaa Shindi","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02663-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achieving digital health equity is essential to realizing the transformative goals of the Quintuple. Aim: optimizing patient experience, improving population health, supporting provider well-being, reducing costs, and advancing health equity. Yet significant disparities persist in access to digital tools, driven by both traditional and digital social determinants of health (SDOH), such as housing instability and limited broadband access. Health system responses often focus on downstream interventions to meet immediate needs, such as referrals for housing assistance or smartphone distribution, while upstream strategies, like partnerships to expand access to affordable housing or advocacy to improve broadband access, remain underutilized. Similarly, targeted tools for specific populations often lack corresponding universal strategies like digital literacy campaigns. The absence of systematic Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration of SDOH data further limits health systems' ability to identify disparities, tailor interventions, and support structural change. This paper introduces a theoretically grounded, multi-level framework for advancing digital health equity within Learning Health Systems (LHS). Drawing on insights from information systems theories, socio-ecological models, organizational learning, implementation science, and systems thinking, the framework supports alignment of equity-centered strategies across micro- (individual), meso- (organizational), and macro- (policy) levels. The framework is organized around three strategic domains: (1) building equity-driven data infrastructure through SDOH-EHR integration, (2) designing scalable, equity-centered interventions that balance targeted and universal approaches, and (3) leveraging strategic starting points to transition from downstream efforts to upstream reforms. Grounded in the U.S. context yet informed by international evidence, this framework offers a roadmap for aligning theory and practice to advance digital health equity in LHS. It is both actionable and adaptable, translating evidence and theory into a structured approach that healthcare systems can use to guide health equity initiatives. It illustrates how SDOH data can inform person-centered care, how targeted tools like multilingual telehealth apps can be integrated with universal strategies such as digital literacy campaigns, and how enabling services, community partnerships, and policy advocacy can catalyze longer-term structural reforms. Emphasizing continuous learning through feedback loops and multi-level alignment, the framework equips stakeholders to embed equity into LHS design and function, ultimately advancing sustainable progress toward the Quintuple Aim.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02663-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving digital health equity is essential to realizing the transformative goals of the Quintuple. Aim: optimizing patient experience, improving population health, supporting provider well-being, reducing costs, and advancing health equity. Yet significant disparities persist in access to digital tools, driven by both traditional and digital social determinants of health (SDOH), such as housing instability and limited broadband access. Health system responses often focus on downstream interventions to meet immediate needs, such as referrals for housing assistance or smartphone distribution, while upstream strategies, like partnerships to expand access to affordable housing or advocacy to improve broadband access, remain underutilized. Similarly, targeted tools for specific populations often lack corresponding universal strategies like digital literacy campaigns. The absence of systematic Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration of SDOH data further limits health systems' ability to identify disparities, tailor interventions, and support structural change. This paper introduces a theoretically grounded, multi-level framework for advancing digital health equity within Learning Health Systems (LHS). Drawing on insights from information systems theories, socio-ecological models, organizational learning, implementation science, and systems thinking, the framework supports alignment of equity-centered strategies across micro- (individual), meso- (organizational), and macro- (policy) levels. The framework is organized around three strategic domains: (1) building equity-driven data infrastructure through SDOH-EHR integration, (2) designing scalable, equity-centered interventions that balance targeted and universal approaches, and (3) leveraging strategic starting points to transition from downstream efforts to upstream reforms. Grounded in the U.S. context yet informed by international evidence, this framework offers a roadmap for aligning theory and practice to advance digital health equity in LHS. It is both actionable and adaptable, translating evidence and theory into a structured approach that healthcare systems can use to guide health equity initiatives. It illustrates how SDOH data can inform person-centered care, how targeted tools like multilingual telehealth apps can be integrated with universal strategies such as digital literacy campaigns, and how enabling services, community partnerships, and policy advocacy can catalyze longer-term structural reforms. Emphasizing continuous learning through feedback loops and multi-level alignment, the framework equips stakeholders to embed equity into LHS design and function, ultimately advancing sustainable progress toward the Quintuple Aim.

Abstract Image

在学习卫生系统中推进数字卫生公平的多层次框架:使实践和理论与“五大目标”保持一致。
实现数字卫生公平对于实现“五大目标”的变革性目标至关重要。目的:优化患者体验,改善人口健康,支持提供者福祉,降低成本,促进卫生公平。然而,由于传统和数字健康社会决定因素(SDOH),如住房不稳定和宽带接入有限,在获取数字工具方面仍然存在巨大差距。卫生系统的应对措施往往侧重于满足眼前需求的下游干预措施,如转诊住房援助或分发智能手机,而上游战略,如建立伙伴关系以扩大可负担住房的可及性或宣传改善宽带接入,仍未得到充分利用。同样,针对特定人群的针对性工具往往缺乏相应的普遍战略,如数字扫盲运动。缺乏系统的电子健康记录(EHR)整合SDOH数据进一步限制了卫生系统识别差异、定制干预措施和支持结构变革的能力。本文介绍了在学习健康系统(LHS)中推进数字健康公平的理论基础,多层次框架。利用信息系统理论、社会生态模型、组织学习、实施科学和系统思维的见解,该框架支持在微观(个人)、中观(组织)和宏观(政策)层面协调以公平为中心的战略。该框架围绕三个战略领域进行组织:(1)通过SDOH-EHR集成构建股权驱动的数据基础设施;(2)设计可扩展的、以股权为中心的干预措施,平衡有针对性和普遍的方法;(3)利用战略起点,从下游努力过渡到上游改革。该框架以美国背景为基础,以国际证据为依据,为协调理论和实践以推进LHS的数字卫生公平提供了路线图。它具有可操作性和适应性,可将证据和理论转化为卫生保健系统可用于指导卫生公平行动的结构化方法。它说明了SDOH数据如何为以人为本的护理提供信息,多语言远程医疗应用程序等有针对性的工具如何与数字扫盲运动等普遍战略相结合,以及扶持服务、社区伙伴关系和政策倡导如何促进长期结构改革。该框架强调通过反馈循环和多层次协调进行持续学习,使利益相关者能够将公平嵌入LHS的设计和功能中,最终推动实现“五大目标”的可持续进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信