Efficacy and safety of biliary stenting combined with 125I seed implantation for the treatment of advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1608312
Cai Cheng, Bo Wang, Chunmu Miao, Shengwei Li
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of biliary stenting combined with <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation for the treatment of advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Cai Cheng, Bo Wang, Chunmu Miao, Shengwei Li","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1608312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implantation of <sup>125</sup>I seed is expected to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing stent placement for advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), but its efficacy and safety remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty advanced eCCA patients who received percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) (control group) and 40 PTBS combined with <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation (<sup>125</sup>I group) were retrospectively analyzed. Changes in serum biochemical indicators and tumor markers as well as the occurrence of complications were observed in the two groups, and the durations of stent patency and survival were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The general information and preoperative baseline data did not significantly differ between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Regardless of whether PTBS was combined with <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation, the ALT/AST levels of patients after operation were significantly lower, jaundice was relieved. And the improvements in postoperative liver function and jaundice in patients in <sup>125</sup>I group were better than those in control group. In addition, tumor markers in the two groups decreased significantly, and the decrease was more significant in patients in <sup>125</sup>I group. There was no significant difference in the total complication rate between the two groups. The stent patency time and overall survival of the patients in the <sup>125</sup>I group were longer than those in control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biliary stenting combined with <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with advanced eCCA, and it is superior to biliary stenting alone in improving liver function and prolonging the duration of stent patency and survival time.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1608312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1608312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The implantation of 125I seed is expected to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing stent placement for advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), but its efficacy and safety remain unclear.

Methods: Forty advanced eCCA patients who received percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) (control group) and 40 PTBS combined with 125I seed implantation (125I group) were retrospectively analyzed. Changes in serum biochemical indicators and tumor markers as well as the occurrence of complications were observed in the two groups, and the durations of stent patency and survival were compared.

Results: The general information and preoperative baseline data did not significantly differ between the two groups (P < 0.05). Regardless of whether PTBS was combined with 125I seed implantation, the ALT/AST levels of patients after operation were significantly lower, jaundice was relieved. And the improvements in postoperative liver function and jaundice in patients in 125I group were better than those in control group. In addition, tumor markers in the two groups decreased significantly, and the decrease was more significant in patients in 125I group. There was no significant difference in the total complication rate between the two groups. The stent patency time and overall survival of the patients in the 125I group were longer than those in control group.

Conclusion: Biliary stenting combined with 125I seed implantation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with advanced eCCA, and it is superior to biliary stenting alone in improving liver function and prolonging the duration of stent patency and survival time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胆道支架联合125I粒子植入术治疗晚期肝外胆管癌的疗效和安全性。
背景:125I粒子植入有望改善晚期肝外胆管癌(eCCA)支架置入术患者的预后,但其疗效和安全性尚不清楚。方法:回顾性分析40例经皮经肝胆道支架植入术(PTBS)(对照组)和40例PTBS联合125I粒子植入术(125I组)的晚期eCCA患者。观察两组患者血清生化指标、肿瘤标志物变化及并发症发生情况,比较两组患者支架通畅时间和生存时间。结果:两组患者一般资料及术前基线资料无显著差异(p125i粒子植入术后患者ALT/AST水平明显降低,黄疸得到缓解。125I组患者术后肝功能及黄疸的改善情况均优于对照组。此外,两组患者肿瘤标志物均明显下降,其中125I组患者下降更为明显。两组总并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。125I组患者的支架通畅时间和总生存期均长于对照组。结论:胆道支架联合125I粒子植入术是晚期eCCA患者安全有效的治疗方法,在改善肝功能、延长支架通畅时间和生存时间方面优于单行胆道支架植入术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信