Explaining health behavior: a new model centered around health experience and its determinants.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626812
Damien S E Broekharst, Sjaak Bloem, Edward A G Groenland, Tessa S Folkertsma, Jim Ingebretsen Carlson, Frans Folkvord, Claire Everitt, Aad R Liefveld, Giuseppe Fico, Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva
{"title":"Explaining health behavior: a new model centered around health experience and its determinants.","authors":"Damien S E Broekharst, Sjaak Bloem, Edward A G Groenland, Tessa S Folkertsma, Jim Ingebretsen Carlson, Frans Folkvord, Claire Everitt, Aad R Liefveld, Giuseppe Fico, Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional health-related models used to predict health behaviors have limited predictive power, as they fail to accurately capture an individual's health experience, which correlates more closely with health behavior. Therefore, some researchers have aimed to develop a predictive model focused on subjective health experience and its determinants. Although this model may be promising, it is still rudimentary. Hence, this study aimed to explore a new extended subjective health experience model and segment it along the lines of relevant demographic variables to further improve health behavior predictions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online questionnaire was administered to a panel of 2,550 Dutch citizens, covering sample characteristics and measuring health perceptions, acceptance, control, projected health, experienced health, adjustment, and health behavior. Data were analyzed using descriptive, reliability, validity, and model statistics.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The analysis revealed that almost all assumed direct relationships within the overall and segmented models are statistically significant, making them exceptionally robust. It also became clear that health perception indirectly influences health behavior through several pathways. The strongest indirect pathways linking health perception to health behavior involve sequential mediation by acceptance, experienced health, and projected health, with control potentially preceding or replacing acceptance. The most moderate indirect pathways involve acceptance with either experienced or projected health, with control potentially preceding or replacing acceptance. The weaker indirect pathways are those involving adjustment either combined with experienced and projected health or embedded within more extended sequences. It further became evident that the model explained between 39.2 and 50.9% of the variance in health behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare professionals and other stakeholders may benefit from using key concepts such as acceptance, control, experienced health, and projected health to guide the development and implementation of future behavioral interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1626812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional health-related models used to predict health behaviors have limited predictive power, as they fail to accurately capture an individual's health experience, which correlates more closely with health behavior. Therefore, some researchers have aimed to develop a predictive model focused on subjective health experience and its determinants. Although this model may be promising, it is still rudimentary. Hence, this study aimed to explore a new extended subjective health experience model and segment it along the lines of relevant demographic variables to further improve health behavior predictions.

Method: An online questionnaire was administered to a panel of 2,550 Dutch citizens, covering sample characteristics and measuring health perceptions, acceptance, control, projected health, experienced health, adjustment, and health behavior. Data were analyzed using descriptive, reliability, validity, and model statistics.

Result: The analysis revealed that almost all assumed direct relationships within the overall and segmented models are statistically significant, making them exceptionally robust. It also became clear that health perception indirectly influences health behavior through several pathways. The strongest indirect pathways linking health perception to health behavior involve sequential mediation by acceptance, experienced health, and projected health, with control potentially preceding or replacing acceptance. The most moderate indirect pathways involve acceptance with either experienced or projected health, with control potentially preceding or replacing acceptance. The weaker indirect pathways are those involving adjustment either combined with experienced and projected health or embedded within more extended sequences. It further became evident that the model explained between 39.2 and 50.9% of the variance in health behavior.

Conclusion: Healthcare professionals and other stakeholders may benefit from using key concepts such as acceptance, control, experienced health, and projected health to guide the development and implementation of future behavioral interventions.

Abstract Image

解释健康行为:一个以健康经验及其决定因素为中心的新模型。
导论:用于预测健康行为的传统健康相关模型的预测能力有限,因为它们无法准确捕捉个人的健康经历,而健康经历与健康行为的关系更为密切。因此,一些研究人员致力于开发一种专注于主观健康体验及其决定因素的预测模型。尽管这种模式可能很有前途,但它仍然是初级的。因此,本研究旨在探索一个新的扩展的主观健康体验模型,并沿着相关的人口变量进行分割,以进一步改善健康行为预测。方法:对2,550名荷兰公民进行在线问卷调查,涵盖样本特征,并测量健康感知、接受、控制、预期健康、经历健康、调整和健康行为。采用描述性统计、信度统计、效度统计和模型统计对数据进行分析。结果:分析显示,在整体和分割模型中,几乎所有假设的直接关系在统计上都是显著的,这使得它们非常稳健。健康感知通过几种途径间接影响健康行为也变得很清楚。连接健康感知与健康行为的最强间接途径包括接受、体验健康和预期健康的顺序调解,控制可能先于或取代接受。最温和的间接途径包括对经验健康或预期健康的接受,控制可能先于或取代接受。较弱的间接途径是那些与经验和预期健康相结合的调整,或嵌入在更扩展的序列中。更明显的是,该模型解释了39.2%至50.9%的健康行为差异。结论:医疗保健专业人员和其他利益相关者可能会受益于使用关键概念,如接受,控制,体验健康和预期健康来指导未来行为干预的发展和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信