Assessing surgical trauma in robot-assisted pelvic fracture fixation: the role of the systemic immune-inflammatory index.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594928
Zhang Yong-Tao, Niu Jing, Chen Xin-Zhi, Yang Hai-Liang, He Quan-Jie, Liu Huan
{"title":"Assessing surgical trauma in robot-assisted pelvic fracture fixation: the role of the systemic immune-inflammatory index.","authors":"Zhang Yong-Tao, Niu Jing, Chen Xin-Zhi, Yang Hai-Liang, He Quan-Jie, Liu Huan","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the degree of surgical invasiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with anterior pelvic ring fractures who underwent INFIX internal fixation, either with or without robotic assistance, between July 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the use of robot-assisted techniques. Exclusion criteria included the presence of multiple fractures requiring additional internal fixation, pre-existing infections, or underlying conditions that could influence inflammatory blood markers. Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury were documented. The SII was assessed both pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of SII regarding surgical invasiveness, with optimal cut-off values determined using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 patients were included in the study. No significant differences in gender or age were observed between the robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted groups. Compared to the non-robot-assisted group, the robot-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter operative duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and a lower incidence of LFCN palsy (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, the postoperative SII was significantly lower in the robot-assisted group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that postoperative SII exhibited a predictive capability for surgical invasiveness, with an optimal cut-off value of 745.15 (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 83.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the postoperative SII may serve as a valuable biomarker reflecting the degree of surgical invasiveness associated with robot-assisted or conventional INFIX procedures for anterior pelvic ring fractures. A postoperative SII value exceeding 745.15 demonstrates promising predictive utility for elevated surgical trauma, with a specificity of 83.3% and sensitivity of 75%.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1594928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the degree of surgical invasiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.

Methods: This study enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with anterior pelvic ring fractures who underwent INFIX internal fixation, either with or without robotic assistance, between July 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the use of robot-assisted techniques. Exclusion criteria included the presence of multiple fractures requiring additional internal fixation, pre-existing infections, or underlying conditions that could influence inflammatory blood markers. Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury were documented. The SII was assessed both pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of SII regarding surgical invasiveness, with optimal cut-off values determined using the Youden index.

Results: A total of 41 patients were included in the study. No significant differences in gender or age were observed between the robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted groups. Compared to the non-robot-assisted group, the robot-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter operative duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and a lower incidence of LFCN palsy (P < 0.05). In addition, the postoperative SII was significantly lower in the robot-assisted group (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that postoperative SII exhibited a predictive capability for surgical invasiveness, with an optimal cut-off value of 745.15 (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 83.3%).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the postoperative SII may serve as a valuable biomarker reflecting the degree of surgical invasiveness associated with robot-assisted or conventional INFIX procedures for anterior pelvic ring fractures. A postoperative SII value exceeding 745.15 demonstrates promising predictive utility for elevated surgical trauma, with a specificity of 83.3% and sensitivity of 75%.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估机器人辅助骨盆骨折固定手术创伤:全身免疫炎症指数的作用。
目的:本研究旨在评估机器人辅助固定术治疗骨盆前环骨折患者的全身免疫炎症指数(SII)与手术侵入程度的关系。方法:本研究招募了年龄在18-80岁的骨盆前环骨折患者,他们在2022年7月至2023年12月期间接受了INFIX内固定,有或没有机器人辅助。根据机器人辅助技术的使用情况,参与者被分为两组。排除标准包括需要额外内固定的多处骨折、既往感染或可能影响炎症血液标志物的潜在疾病。记录手术时间、术中出血量和股外侧皮神经损伤发生率。术前和术后均对SII进行评估。采用t检验进行统计分析。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以评估SII对手术侵袭性的预测性能,并使用约登指数确定最佳临界值。结果:共纳入41例患者。在机器人辅助组和非机器人辅助组之间没有观察到性别或年龄的显着差异。与非机器人辅助组相比,机器人辅助组的手术时间明显缩短,术中出血减少,LFCN麻痹发生率降低(P P)。结论:研究结果表明,术后SII可作为反映机器人辅助或传统INFIX手术治疗骨盆前环骨折手术侵入程度的有价值的生物标志物。术后SII值超过745.15,特异性为83.3%,敏感性为75%,对手术创伤加重有预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信