Zhang Yong-Tao, Niu Jing, Chen Xin-Zhi, Yang Hai-Liang, He Quan-Jie, Liu Huan
{"title":"Assessing surgical trauma in robot-assisted pelvic fracture fixation: the role of the systemic immune-inflammatory index.","authors":"Zhang Yong-Tao, Niu Jing, Chen Xin-Zhi, Yang Hai-Liang, He Quan-Jie, Liu Huan","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the degree of surgical invasiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with anterior pelvic ring fractures who underwent INFIX internal fixation, either with or without robotic assistance, between July 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the use of robot-assisted techniques. Exclusion criteria included the presence of multiple fractures requiring additional internal fixation, pre-existing infections, or underlying conditions that could influence inflammatory blood markers. Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury were documented. The SII was assessed both pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of SII regarding surgical invasiveness, with optimal cut-off values determined using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 patients were included in the study. No significant differences in gender or age were observed between the robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted groups. Compared to the non-robot-assisted group, the robot-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter operative duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and a lower incidence of LFCN palsy (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, the postoperative SII was significantly lower in the robot-assisted group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that postoperative SII exhibited a predictive capability for surgical invasiveness, with an optimal cut-off value of 745.15 (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 83.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the postoperative SII may serve as a valuable biomarker reflecting the degree of surgical invasiveness associated with robot-assisted or conventional INFIX procedures for anterior pelvic ring fractures. A postoperative SII value exceeding 745.15 demonstrates promising predictive utility for elevated surgical trauma, with a specificity of 83.3% and sensitivity of 75%.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1594928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the degree of surgical invasiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.
Methods: This study enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with anterior pelvic ring fractures who underwent INFIX internal fixation, either with or without robotic assistance, between July 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the use of robot-assisted techniques. Exclusion criteria included the presence of multiple fractures requiring additional internal fixation, pre-existing infections, or underlying conditions that could influence inflammatory blood markers. Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury were documented. The SII was assessed both pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of SII regarding surgical invasiveness, with optimal cut-off values determined using the Youden index.
Results: A total of 41 patients were included in the study. No significant differences in gender or age were observed between the robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted groups. Compared to the non-robot-assisted group, the robot-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter operative duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and a lower incidence of LFCN palsy (P < 0.05). In addition, the postoperative SII was significantly lower in the robot-assisted group (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that postoperative SII exhibited a predictive capability for surgical invasiveness, with an optimal cut-off value of 745.15 (area under the curve = 0.81; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 83.3%).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the postoperative SII may serve as a valuable biomarker reflecting the degree of surgical invasiveness associated with robot-assisted or conventional INFIX procedures for anterior pelvic ring fractures. A postoperative SII value exceeding 745.15 demonstrates promising predictive utility for elevated surgical trauma, with a specificity of 83.3% and sensitivity of 75%.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.