Associations between objectively and subjectively measured sleep outcomes among elementary school children in Rhode Island.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1622943
Aliana Rodriguez Acevedo, Diane Story, Lovisa Werner, David H Barker, John E McGeary, Shira I Dunsiger, Diana S Grigsby-Toussaint
{"title":"Associations between objectively and subjectively measured sleep outcomes among elementary school children in Rhode Island.","authors":"Aliana Rodriguez Acevedo, Diane Story, Lovisa Werner, David H Barker, John E McGeary, Shira I Dunsiger, Diana S Grigsby-Toussaint","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1622943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although sleep is essential for healthy child development, parents generally misconstrue definitions of sleep duration and sleep quality. This study examines differences between objective and parent-reported measures of sleep in children, with a particular focus on Latino and non-Latino groups. We hypothesized that significant discrepancies exist between objective and subjective sleep measures and differences in sleep outcomes between Latino and non-Latino subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children in grades one, two, and three in Rhode Island (<i>n</i> = 102; age range 6-10 years; 57.8% female) wore an accelerometer for seven days to objectively measure time in bed, sleep duration, wake after sleep onset, and sleep latency. Parents also reported perceived sleep outcomes, and whether they believed their child generally \"sleeps the right amount\". Emphasis was placed on the Latino population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on parent-reported sleep measures, 83.3% of children met sleep guidelines (defined as 9-12 h per night), compared to 14.7% based on accelerometry (<i>ρ</i> = -0.036, <i>p</i> = 0.711). Average sleep duration significantly differed between parent reports (9.58 h, SD = 1.42) and actigraphy (8.32 h, SD = 0.70; <i>ρ</i> = 0.405, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no discrepancies between objective and subjective reported sleep latency and WASO, although paired tests indicated significant within-person differences in WASO (<i>p</i> < .001). Finally, there were significant discrepancies in sleep duration between Latinos and non-Latinos, with Latino caregivers reporting significantly shorter sleep and their children experiencing shorter sleep duration as measured via actigraphy, and being less likely to meet sleep guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that there is a discrepancy between perceived and objectively measured sleep. It also suggests discrepancies in sleep duration between Latino and non-Latino children, and differences in parental knowledge of sleep behaviors between Latinos and non-Latinos.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1622943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1622943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although sleep is essential for healthy child development, parents generally misconstrue definitions of sleep duration and sleep quality. This study examines differences between objective and parent-reported measures of sleep in children, with a particular focus on Latino and non-Latino groups. We hypothesized that significant discrepancies exist between objective and subjective sleep measures and differences in sleep outcomes between Latino and non-Latino subgroups.

Methods: Children in grades one, two, and three in Rhode Island (n = 102; age range 6-10 years; 57.8% female) wore an accelerometer for seven days to objectively measure time in bed, sleep duration, wake after sleep onset, and sleep latency. Parents also reported perceived sleep outcomes, and whether they believed their child generally "sleeps the right amount". Emphasis was placed on the Latino population.

Results: Based on parent-reported sleep measures, 83.3% of children met sleep guidelines (defined as 9-12 h per night), compared to 14.7% based on accelerometry (ρ = -0.036, p = 0.711). Average sleep duration significantly differed between parent reports (9.58 h, SD = 1.42) and actigraphy (8.32 h, SD = 0.70; ρ = 0.405, p < 0.001). There were no discrepancies between objective and subjective reported sleep latency and WASO, although paired tests indicated significant within-person differences in WASO (p < .001). Finally, there were significant discrepancies in sleep duration between Latinos and non-Latinos, with Latino caregivers reporting significantly shorter sleep and their children experiencing shorter sleep duration as measured via actigraphy, and being less likely to meet sleep guidelines.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that there is a discrepancy between perceived and objectively measured sleep. It also suggests discrepancies in sleep duration between Latino and non-Latino children, and differences in parental knowledge of sleep behaviors between Latinos and non-Latinos.

罗德岛州小学生客观和主观测量睡眠结果之间的联系。
目的:虽然睡眠对儿童的健康发育至关重要,但家长通常会误解睡眠时间和睡眠质量的定义。这项研究考察了客观和父母报告的儿童睡眠测量之间的差异,特别关注拉丁裔和非拉丁裔群体。我们假设客观和主观睡眠测量之间存在显著差异,拉丁裔和非拉丁裔亚组之间的睡眠结果存在差异。方法:罗德岛州一、二、三年级儿童(n = 102,年龄范围6-10岁,57.8%为女性)佩戴加速度计7天,客观测量卧床时间、睡眠持续时间、入睡后醒来时间和睡眠潜伏期。家长们还报告了他们感知到的睡眠结果,以及他们是否认为自己的孩子总体上“睡得适量”。重点放在拉丁裔人口上。结果:根据家长报告的睡眠测量,83.3%的儿童符合睡眠指南(定义为每晚9-12小时),而根据加速度计,这一比例为14.7% (ρ = -0.036, p = 0.711)。家长报告的平均睡眠时间(9.58 h, SD = 1.42)与活动记录的平均睡眠时间(8.32 h, SD = 0.70; ρ = 0.405, p p)存在显著差异。结论:这些发现提示感知睡眠与客观测量睡眠存在差异。研究还表明,拉丁裔和非拉丁裔儿童的睡眠时间存在差异,父母对拉丁裔和非拉丁裔儿童睡眠行为的了解也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信