Avoidable severe morbidity from wound dehiscence after cesarean section: Practice and experience from a tertiary referral hospital in a low-income setting, Tanzania-a mixed-methods study.
Andrew Hans Mgaya, Raymond Oyugi Samuel, Isaya Erasto Mhando, Hery Omary Kimwela, Hans Nathanael Mgaya
{"title":"Avoidable severe morbidity from wound dehiscence after cesarean section: Practice and experience from a tertiary referral hospital in a low-income setting, Tanzania-a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Andrew Hans Mgaya, Raymond Oyugi Samuel, Isaya Erasto Mhando, Hery Omary Kimwela, Hans Nathanael Mgaya","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1524507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to determine care-related risk factors and explore the perspectives of women and care providers about complete wound dehiscence after cesarean section at a tertiary referral and university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam between April 2019 and December 2020. A case control survey compared the characteristics of interest of 131 cases of complete wound dehiscence with 393 randomly selected controls comprising cesarean deliveries between January 2015 and December 2020. In addition, six semistructured individual in-depth interviews with women, one focus group discussion with care providers, and unstructured direct observations were performed between July 2020 and December 2020. Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine the percentage difference of risk factors of complete wound dehiscence between cases and controls. Thereafter, a multivariate regression analysis determined the role of the independent risk factors. A thematic analysis was used to describe qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 524 women (131 cases and 393 controls), 75% of deliveries were performed by obstetric registrars and residents. Cases of complete wound dehiscence were more likely from cesarean deliveries performed by junior residents [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.4]. Wound failure was characterized by complete wound dehiscence with intact sutures (70%) on loosely binding wound margins (62%) or avulsed from the fascial layers (38%). The perspectives of women and care providers were categorized into four themes: wound dehiscence as an indicator of the quality of care; effectiveness of clinical skill transfer and team work; maternal fear, stress, and socioeconomic burden; and significant external factors influencing care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complete wound dehiscence after cesarean section was highly associated with a suboptimal surgical technique, an ineffective structure and process of clinical skill transfer, and negative experience of care from patients and their families. The identified serious and preventable gaps in the quality of cesarean section stemmed from modifiable clinical and educational practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1524507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1524507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to determine care-related risk factors and explore the perspectives of women and care providers about complete wound dehiscence after cesarean section at a tertiary referral and university hospital.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam between April 2019 and December 2020. A case control survey compared the characteristics of interest of 131 cases of complete wound dehiscence with 393 randomly selected controls comprising cesarean deliveries between January 2015 and December 2020. In addition, six semistructured individual in-depth interviews with women, one focus group discussion with care providers, and unstructured direct observations were performed between July 2020 and December 2020. Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine the percentage difference of risk factors of complete wound dehiscence between cases and controls. Thereafter, a multivariate regression analysis determined the role of the independent risk factors. A thematic analysis was used to describe qualitative data.
Results: Out of 524 women (131 cases and 393 controls), 75% of deliveries were performed by obstetric registrars and residents. Cases of complete wound dehiscence were more likely from cesarean deliveries performed by junior residents [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.4]. Wound failure was characterized by complete wound dehiscence with intact sutures (70%) on loosely binding wound margins (62%) or avulsed from the fascial layers (38%). The perspectives of women and care providers were categorized into four themes: wound dehiscence as an indicator of the quality of care; effectiveness of clinical skill transfer and team work; maternal fear, stress, and socioeconomic burden; and significant external factors influencing care.
Conclusion: Complete wound dehiscence after cesarean section was highly associated with a suboptimal surgical technique, an ineffective structure and process of clinical skill transfer, and negative experience of care from patients and their families. The identified serious and preventable gaps in the quality of cesarean section stemmed from modifiable clinical and educational practices.
期刊介绍：
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
