Traumatic stress in times of war: a shared responsibility for health professionals.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hala Kerbage, Eva Alisic, Marit Sijbrandij, Iryna Frankova, Diane Purper-Ouakil, Eric Bui
{"title":"Traumatic stress in times of war: a shared responsibility for health professionals.","authors":"Hala Kerbage, Eva Alisic, Marit Sijbrandij, Iryna Frankova, Diane Purper-Ouakil, Eric Bui","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2565117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Armed conflicts continue to inflict profound human suffering, dismantling health systems, displacing populations, and leaving lasting psychological scars. Although war is rooted in political and geopolitical dynamics, its consequences manifest daily in the clinical and ethical dilemmas faced by health professionals.<b>Objective:</b> This editorial calls for a greater ethical and professional commitment from mental health professionals - particularly those in safer contexts - to address the psychological, systemic, and societal impacts of war.<b>Method:</b> Drawing from current evidence in traumatic stress, humanitarian law, and global health, we examine the multilayered consequences of armed conflict, including PTSD, depression, grief, and intergenerational trauma. We reflect on the responsibilities of trauma specialists in times of political violence and mass displacement.<b>Results:</b> The psychological toll of war is amplified by the collapse of support systems, obstruction of care, and direct targeting of healthcare workers. Mental health professionals possess unique expertise not only in treatment, but also in advocacy, education, and testimony. However, trauma care often remains confined to clinical settings, disconnected from policy and public discourse. This editorial emphasises that silence - particularly from those in positions of relative safety - is not neutral, but complicit.<b>Conclusions:</b> There is a professional and ethical imperative for trauma specialists to move beyond the treatment room. This includes amplifying the voices of affected communities, informing policy with trauma-informed evidence, and confronting the systemic injustices that perpetuate violence. Upholding the core values of care, dignity, and justice requires a broader, more engaged response: not only to the aftermath of trauma, but to the structures that produce and sustain it.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2565117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12507100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2565117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Armed conflicts continue to inflict profound human suffering, dismantling health systems, displacing populations, and leaving lasting psychological scars. Although war is rooted in political and geopolitical dynamics, its consequences manifest daily in the clinical and ethical dilemmas faced by health professionals.Objective: This editorial calls for a greater ethical and professional commitment from mental health professionals - particularly those in safer contexts - to address the psychological, systemic, and societal impacts of war.Method: Drawing from current evidence in traumatic stress, humanitarian law, and global health, we examine the multilayered consequences of armed conflict, including PTSD, depression, grief, and intergenerational trauma. We reflect on the responsibilities of trauma specialists in times of political violence and mass displacement.Results: The psychological toll of war is amplified by the collapse of support systems, obstruction of care, and direct targeting of healthcare workers. Mental health professionals possess unique expertise not only in treatment, but also in advocacy, education, and testimony. However, trauma care often remains confined to clinical settings, disconnected from policy and public discourse. This editorial emphasises that silence - particularly from those in positions of relative safety - is not neutral, but complicit.Conclusions: There is a professional and ethical imperative for trauma specialists to move beyond the treatment room. This includes amplifying the voices of affected communities, informing policy with trauma-informed evidence, and confronting the systemic injustices that perpetuate violence. Upholding the core values of care, dignity, and justice requires a broader, more engaged response: not only to the aftermath of trauma, but to the structures that produce and sustain it.

战争时期的创伤压力:卫生专业人员的共同责任。
背景:武装冲突继续给人类造成深重苦难,摧毁卫生系统,使人口流离失所,并留下持久的心理创伤。虽然战争的根源在于政治和地缘政治动态,但其后果每天都表现在卫生专业人员面临的临床和道德困境中。目的:本社论呼吁精神卫生专业人员,特别是在安全环境中的精神卫生专业人员,作出更大的道德和专业承诺,以应对战争的心理、系统和社会影响。方法:根据目前在创伤应激、人道主义法和全球健康方面的证据,我们研究了武装冲突的多层次后果,包括创伤后应激障碍、抑郁、悲伤和代际创伤。我们反思在政治暴力和大规模流离失所时期创伤专家的责任。结果:战争的心理代价被支持系统的崩溃,护理的阻碍和直接针对医护人员放大。精神卫生专业人员不仅在治疗方面,而且在宣传、教育和证词方面都具有独特的专业知识。然而,创伤护理往往仍然局限于临床环境,与政策和公众话语脱节。这篇社论强调,沉默——尤其是那些处于相对安全位置的人——不是中立的,而是同谋的。结论:创伤专家走出治疗室是一种专业和道德的要求。这包括放大受影响社区的声音,以创伤证据为政策提供信息,以及面对使暴力永久化的系统性不公正。维护关怀、尊严和正义的核心价值需要更广泛、更积极的应对:不仅要应对创伤的后果,还要应对产生和维持创伤的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信