Sex-Specific Disparities in Lipid-Based Prediction of Major Cardiovascular Events.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
L Schnetzer, A Muendlein, A Festa, C H Saely, H Drexel, A Leiherer
{"title":"Sex-Specific Disparities in Lipid-Based Prediction of Major Cardiovascular Events.","authors":"L Schnetzer, A Muendlein, A Festa, C H Saely, H Drexel, A Leiherer","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipid-based markers have a profound prognostic potential concerning cardiovascular diseases. However, differences in lipid levels between women and men are evident and it is unknown whether the differences also extend to the predictive power of the lipid markers. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate potential sex differences concerning the risk estimation of five topical lipid markers: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), remnant cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1), the triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol (TG/HDL)-ratio, and ceramide scores (CERT1 and CERT2).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, the lipid markers were obtained for patients with high cardiovascular risk, who were followed for major cardiovascular events (MACE) for up to 14 years. The risk estimation was done for women (n=433) and age-matched men (n=433) separately using multiple performance and discrimination metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women showed higher LDL-C and ApoA-1 and lower remnant cholesterol and TG/HDL-ratio. Also, CERT1, but not CERT2, differed between the sexes, with women scoring slightly higher. During follow-up, MACE occurred in 25% of women and 37% of men. While an adjusted Cox regression demonstrated that remnant cholesterol significantly predicted MACE in both sexes, the ApoA-1 and TG/HDL-ratio was a predictor only in women, whereas ceramide-based scores predicted MACE solely in men. LDL-C showed no predictive potential in this high-risk cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To estimate cardiovascular risk, in several cases a sex-specific adaptation of lipid markers seems warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipid-based markers have a profound prognostic potential concerning cardiovascular diseases. However, differences in lipid levels between women and men are evident and it is unknown whether the differences also extend to the predictive power of the lipid markers. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate potential sex differences concerning the risk estimation of five topical lipid markers: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), remnant cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1), the triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol (TG/HDL)-ratio, and ceramide scores (CERT1 and CERT2).

Material and methods: In this prospective cohort study, the lipid markers were obtained for patients with high cardiovascular risk, who were followed for major cardiovascular events (MACE) for up to 14 years. The risk estimation was done for women (n=433) and age-matched men (n=433) separately using multiple performance and discrimination metrics.

Results: Women showed higher LDL-C and ApoA-1 and lower remnant cholesterol and TG/HDL-ratio. Also, CERT1, but not CERT2, differed between the sexes, with women scoring slightly higher. During follow-up, MACE occurred in 25% of women and 37% of men. While an adjusted Cox regression demonstrated that remnant cholesterol significantly predicted MACE in both sexes, the ApoA-1 and TG/HDL-ratio was a predictor only in women, whereas ceramide-based scores predicted MACE solely in men. LDL-C showed no predictive potential in this high-risk cohort.

Conclusion: To estimate cardiovascular risk, in several cases a sex-specific adaptation of lipid markers seems warranted.

基于脂质预测主要心血管事件的性别差异
背景:基于脂质的标志物对心血管疾病具有深远的预后潜力。然而,女性和男性之间的脂质水平差异是明显的,目前尚不清楚这种差异是否也延伸到脂质标志物的预测能力。因此,本研究旨在评估五种局部脂质标志物的潜在性别差异:低密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(LDL-C)、残余胆固醇、载脂蛋白A-1 (ApoA-1)、甘油三酯/高密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(TG/HDL)-比率和神经酰胺评分(CERT1和CERT2)。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,获得了心血管高危患者的脂质标志物,并对这些患者进行了长达14年的主要心血管事件(MACE)随访。对女性(n=433)和年龄匹配的男性(n=433)分别使用多重表现和歧视指标进行风险评估。结果:女性LDL-C和ApoA-1升高,残余胆固醇和TG/ hdl比值降低。此外,CERT1(而非CERT2)在两性之间存在差异,女性的得分略高。在随访期间,MACE发生率为25%的女性和37%的男性。虽然经校正的Cox回归分析表明,残余胆固醇在两性中均能显著预测MACE,但ApoA-1和TG/ hdl比值仅能预测女性,而神经酰胺评分仅能预测男性的MACE。LDL-C在这一高危人群中无预测潜力。结论:为了估计心血管风险,在一些情况下,脂质标志物的性别特异性适应似乎是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信