Inpatient Tricuspid Valve Transcatheter and Surgical Inpatient Outcomes: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Angiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI:10.1177/00033197251379122
Laith Alhuneafat, Omar Obeidat, Mohammed Ayyad, Ahmad Alayyat, Waqas Rasheed, Ahmad Maaita, Fares Ghanem, Zaid Shahrori, Anas Alameh, Ahmad Al-Abdouh, Pedro Villablanca, Ahmad Jabri
{"title":"Inpatient Tricuspid Valve Transcatheter and Surgical Inpatient Outcomes: A Propensity Matched Analysis.","authors":"Laith Alhuneafat, Omar Obeidat, Mohammed Ayyad, Ahmad Alayyat, Waqas Rasheed, Ahmad Maaita, Fares Ghanem, Zaid Shahrori, Anas Alameh, Ahmad Al-Abdouh, Pedro Villablanca, Ahmad Jabri","doi":"10.1177/00033197251379122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While surgical repair (STVr) and replacement (STVR) are established treatments, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) have emerged as less invasive alternatives. The present study compared inpatient outcomes of TTVI, STVr, and STVR using data from the National Inpatient Sample (2011-2020). A retrospective analysis identified 1830 TTVI, 76 747 STVr, and 19 625 STVR procedures. After propensity score matching, 1655 TTVI-STVr and 1286 TTVI-STVR patient pairs were included. Compared with surgery, TTVI was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 7.0% STVr; 2.3% vs 11.6% STVR; <i>P</i> < .001), shorter hospital stays (6.9 vs 15.6 days STVr; 7.2 vs 17.6 days STVR; <i>P</i> < .001), and reduced costs. TTVI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays compared with surgical interventions in this analysis. Given the limitations of retrospective studies, including selection bias and lack of long-term follow-up, these findings require cautious interpretation. Prospective studies are needed to compare the efficacy and durability of TTVI versus surgery for TR.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"999-1006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251379122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While surgical repair (STVr) and replacement (STVR) are established treatments, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) have emerged as less invasive alternatives. The present study compared inpatient outcomes of TTVI, STVr, and STVR using data from the National Inpatient Sample (2011-2020). A retrospective analysis identified 1830 TTVI, 76 747 STVr, and 19 625 STVR procedures. After propensity score matching, 1655 TTVI-STVr and 1286 TTVI-STVR patient pairs were included. Compared with surgery, TTVI was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 7.0% STVr; 2.3% vs 11.6% STVR; P < .001), shorter hospital stays (6.9 vs 15.6 days STVr; 7.2 vs 17.6 days STVR; P < .001), and reduced costs. TTVI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays compared with surgical interventions in this analysis. Given the limitations of retrospective studies, including selection bias and lack of long-term follow-up, these findings require cautious interpretation. Prospective studies are needed to compare the efficacy and durability of TTVI versus surgery for TR.

住院患者三尖瓣经导管和外科住院患者结果:倾向匹配分析。
三尖瓣反流(TR)是一种常见的瓣膜疾病,具有显著的发病率和死亡率。虽然手术修复(STVr)和置换术(STVr)是公认的治疗方法,但经导管三尖瓣干预(TTVI)已成为侵入性较小的替代方法。本研究使用2011-2020年全国住院患者样本数据,比较了TTVI、STVr和STVr的住院结果。回顾性分析确定了1830个TTVI, 76 747个STVr和19 625个STVr程序。倾向评分匹配后,纳入1655对TTVI-STVr和1286对TTVI-STVr患者。与手术相比,TTVI与较低的住院死亡率相关(2.4% vs 7.0% STVr; 2.3% vs 11.6% STVr
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书