A meta-analysis of the effects of long-term oxygen therapy combined with exercise rehabilitation on exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with COPD.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1640084
Qi Muge, Suriguga, Yuqing, Aronggaowa, Taojin, Lanying Chen
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the effects of long-term oxygen therapy combined with exercise rehabilitation on exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with COPD.","authors":"Qi Muge, Suriguga, Yuqing, Aronggaowa, Taojin, Lanying Chen","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1640084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) combined with exercise rehabilitation vs. exercise rehabilitation alone in improving exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary function, and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and PubMed for studies published from January 2010 to the present. Controlled clinical trials comparing oxygen therapy and/or exercise rehabilitation in COPD patients were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Handbook (version 5.3). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies (<i>N</i> = 703) met inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group (CG), the combined LTOT and exercise group showed significant improvements in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio (<i>P</i> < 0.05). PaO<sub>2</sub> levels tended to be higher but showed substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were observed in blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, or PaCO<sub>2</sub>. Quality of life significantly improved in the combined therapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTOT combined with exercise rehabilitation is more effective than exercise alone in improving exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and quality of life in COPD patients. However, cardiac benefits remain unclear, warranting further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1640084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1640084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) combined with exercise rehabilitation vs. exercise rehabilitation alone in improving exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary function, and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and PubMed for studies published from January 2010 to the present. Controlled clinical trials comparing oxygen therapy and/or exercise rehabilitation in COPD patients were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Handbook (version 5.3). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results: Nine studies (N = 703) met inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group (CG), the combined LTOT and exercise group showed significant improvements in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio (P < 0.05). PaO2 levels tended to be higher but showed substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were observed in blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, or PaCO2. Quality of life significantly improved in the combined therapy group.

Conclusion: LTOT combined with exercise rehabilitation is more effective than exercise alone in improving exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and quality of life in COPD patients. However, cardiac benefits remain unclear, warranting further studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

长期氧疗联合运动康复对COPD患者运动能力、心肺功能和生活质量影响的荟萃分析
目的:评价长期氧疗(LTOT)联合运动康复与单独运动康复在改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者运动能力、心肺功能和生活质量方面的效果。方法:在中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方、中国知网(CNKI)、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、ScienceDirect和PubMed中检索2010年1月至今发表的研究。对照临床试验比较氧气治疗和/或运动康复对COPD患者的影响。两名独立审稿人使用Cochrane手册(5.3版)提取数据并评估偏倚风险。采用RevMan 5.3进行meta分析。结果:9项研究(N = 703)符合纳入标准。与对照组(CG)相比,LTOT联合运动组在6 min步行距离(6MWD)、1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC比值方面均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。PaO2水平有较高的趋势,但存在较大的异质性。在血氧饱和度、心率或PaCO2方面没有观察到显著差异。联合治疗组患者生活质量明显改善。结论:LTOT联合运动康复在改善COPD患者运动能力、肺功能和生活质量方面比单纯运动更有效。然而,对心脏的益处尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信