Jakub Siemaszko, Rention Pasolari, Alexander van Zuijlen
{"title":"Accelerating Vortex Particle Methods by Downsampling the Vorticity Field Representation","authors":"Jakub Siemaszko, Rention Pasolari, Alexander van Zuijlen","doi":"10.1002/fld.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Computational efficiency of vortex particle methods (VPMs) is hindered by the particle count increasing in simulation time. To reduce the number of computational elements, two algorithms are presented that downsample the discretized vorticity field representation in two-dimensional variable-core-size VPMs. The two methods are based on existing schemes of particle merging and regridding, and are adapted to follow a compression parameter set a priori. The effectiveness of the schemes is demonstrated on two benchmark cases of external flow: A stationary Lamb-Oseen vortex and an advecting vortex dipole. In both cases, compression is associated with a drastic reduction in particle count and computation time at a cost of diffusive errors in the vorticity field. Crucially, for gentle compression steps applied at appropriate intervals, the immediate errors in the vorticity field are comparable to reference cases despite great improvements in computational time. To examine the long-term impact of compression on accuracy and performance, it is recommended that repeated compressive steps be tested on more complex cases of bluff-body wakes, with a focus on the impact of downsampling on surface forces.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"97 11","pages":"1410-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Computational efficiency of vortex particle methods (VPMs) is hindered by the particle count increasing in simulation time. To reduce the number of computational elements, two algorithms are presented that downsample the discretized vorticity field representation in two-dimensional variable-core-size VPMs. The two methods are based on existing schemes of particle merging and regridding, and are adapted to follow a compression parameter set a priori. The effectiveness of the schemes is demonstrated on two benchmark cases of external flow: A stationary Lamb-Oseen vortex and an advecting vortex dipole. In both cases, compression is associated with a drastic reduction in particle count and computation time at a cost of diffusive errors in the vorticity field. Crucially, for gentle compression steps applied at appropriate intervals, the immediate errors in the vorticity field are comparable to reference cases despite great improvements in computational time. To examine the long-term impact of compression on accuracy and performance, it is recommended that repeated compressive steps be tested on more complex cases of bluff-body wakes, with a focus on the impact of downsampling on surface forces.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.