Verification of Infrared Forehead Thermometer Readings Using a Blackbody Radiator at NMCC-SASO

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
MAPAN Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI:10.1007/s12647-025-00834-w
S. D. Suherlan, N. D. AlDawood, I. S. AlSubaie, I. A. AlFaleh, R. O. AlNefaie, K. M. Ahmed
{"title":"Verification of Infrared Forehead Thermometer Readings Using a Blackbody Radiator at NMCC-SASO","authors":"S. D. Suherlan,&nbsp;N. D. AlDawood,&nbsp;I. S. AlSubaie,&nbsp;I. A. AlFaleh,&nbsp;R. O. AlNefaie,&nbsp;K. M. Ahmed","doi":"10.1007/s12647-025-00834-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a verification method for Infrared Forehead Thermometer (IRFT) readings developed at the National Measurement and Calibration Center (NMCC) of the Saudi Standards, Metrology, and Quality Organization (SASO). Six IRFTs from two different models were tested at 38 °C, a temperature threshold for fever according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The IRFT readings were compared against reference radiance temperatures generated by a standard blackbody radiator commonly used for Infrared Ear Thermometer (IRET) calibration. The blackbody was maintained in a temperature-controlled water bath near 38 °C, with its true temperature monitored using a contact standard thermometer (Pt-100). The blackbody’s effective emissivity was calculated as 0.999874, closely matching the default emissivity setting (~ 1.0) of most IRFTs. Instead of using a radiation thermometer, radiance temperatures were calculated from the blackbody’s true temperature measurements using the Sakuma-Hattori Planck III function. When compared to reference radiance temperatures, the laboratory errors in IRFT readings ranged from − 0.20 to 0.09 °C. These values comply with the maximum permissible laboratory error (MPLE) of ± 0.3 °C specified in ASTM E1965-98:2016 for skin IR thermometers. However, when measurement uncertainty (± 0.16 °C) was considered, one IRFT (− 0.20 °C error) failed verification. This was likely due to dust or smudges on the inner lens, which are difficult to clean externally. Further studies are needed to compare and validate these findings using methodologies from other national laboratories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"40 3","pages":"909 - 918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-025-00834-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a verification method for Infrared Forehead Thermometer (IRFT) readings developed at the National Measurement and Calibration Center (NMCC) of the Saudi Standards, Metrology, and Quality Organization (SASO). Six IRFTs from two different models were tested at 38 °C, a temperature threshold for fever according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The IRFT readings were compared against reference radiance temperatures generated by a standard blackbody radiator commonly used for Infrared Ear Thermometer (IRET) calibration. The blackbody was maintained in a temperature-controlled water bath near 38 °C, with its true temperature monitored using a contact standard thermometer (Pt-100). The blackbody’s effective emissivity was calculated as 0.999874, closely matching the default emissivity setting (~ 1.0) of most IRFTs. Instead of using a radiation thermometer, radiance temperatures were calculated from the blackbody’s true temperature measurements using the Sakuma-Hattori Planck III function. When compared to reference radiance temperatures, the laboratory errors in IRFT readings ranged from − 0.20 to 0.09 °C. These values comply with the maximum permissible laboratory error (MPLE) of ± 0.3 °C specified in ASTM E1965-98:2016 for skin IR thermometers. However, when measurement uncertainty (± 0.16 °C) was considered, one IRFT (− 0.20 °C error) failed verification. This was likely due to dust or smudges on the inner lens, which are difficult to clean externally. Further studies are needed to compare and validate these findings using methodologies from other national laboratories.

利用黑体辐射器验证nmc - saso红外额头温度计读数
本研究提出了一种由沙特标准、计量和质量组织(SASO)国家测量和校准中心(NMCC)开发的红外额头温度计(IRFT)读数的验证方法。来自两种不同模型的6个irft在38°C(世界卫生组织(世卫组织)规定的发烧阈值)下进行了测试。将IRFT读数与通常用于红外耳温计(IRET)校准的标准黑体散热器产生的参考辐射温度进行比较。黑体保持在温度控制的38°C水浴中,使用接触式标准温度计(Pt-100)监测其真实温度。计算黑体的有效发射率为0.999874,与大多数irft的默认发射率设置(~ 1.0)非常吻合。没有使用辐射温度计,而是使用Sakuma-Hattori普朗克III函数从黑体的真实温度测量中计算出辐射温度。与参考辐射温度相比,IRFT读数的实验室误差范围为- 0.20至0.09°C。这些值符合ASTM E1965-98:2016皮肤红外温度计规定的±0.3°C的最大允许实验室误差(MPLE)。然而,当考虑测量不确定度(±0.16°C)时,一个IRFT(−0.20°C误差)验证失败。这可能是由于内部镜片上的灰尘或污迹,很难从外部清洁。需要进一步的研究来使用其他国家实验室的方法来比较和验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MAPAN
MAPAN 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology. The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信