Pigtail Catheter Assistance in Guiding Catheter Navigation for Transradial Access for Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.

Gang-Qin Xu, Tian-Xiao Li, Tong-Yuan Zhao, Jiang-Yu Xue, Liang-Fu Zhu, Zi-Liang Wang, Bu-Lang Gao
{"title":"Pigtail Catheter Assistance in Guiding Catheter Navigation for Transradial Access for Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.","authors":"Gang-Qin Xu, Tian-Xiao Li, Tong-Yuan Zhao, Jiang-Yu Xue, Liang-Fu Zhu, Zi-Liang Wang, Bu-Lang Gao","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect and safety of pigtail catheter assistance in navigating the guiding catheter for embolization of anterior circulation aneurysms through the transradial access are unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was to evaluate the effect and safety of pigtail catheter assistance in navigating the guiding catheter for embolization of anterior circulation aneurysms through the transradial access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical, endovascular treatment and follow-up data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 70 aneurysms, including 47 (67.1% or 47/70) unruptured aneurysms and 23 (32.9% or 23/70) ruptured ones. The surgery was successful in 68 (97.1% or 68/70) patients, with a failure in two (2.9% or 2/70) patients. A 6 F guiding catheter was used in 28 (40% or 28/70) patients, and a 6 F intermediate catheter in 42 (60% or 42/70). Stent-assisted coiling was conducted in 50 (71.4% or 50/70) patients, and coiling alone in 20 (28.6% or 20/70). Immediately after embolization, complete occlusion was in 56 (80% or 56/70), neck remnant in 12 (17.1% or 12/70), and residual aneurysm sac in 2 (2.9% or 2/70). Periprocedural complications occurred in four (5.7% or 4/70) patients. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 54 (77.1% or 54/70) patients with 54 aneurysms, and the Raymond-Roy aneurysm occlusion classification was complete occlusion in 46 (85.2% or 46/54), neck remnant in 8 (14.8% or 14/54), and residual aneurysm sac in 0, which was not significantly (p = 0.16) different from that immediately after embolization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pigtail catheter assistance in guiding catheter navigation for embolizing anterior circulation aneurysms via the transradial access is safe and effective even though further confirmation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect and safety of pigtail catheter assistance in navigating the guiding catheter for embolization of anterior circulation aneurysms through the transradial access are unknown.

Aims: This study was to evaluate the effect and safety of pigtail catheter assistance in navigating the guiding catheter for embolization of anterior circulation aneurysms through the transradial access.

Methods: Seventy patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical, endovascular treatment and follow-up data were analyzed.

Results: There were 70 aneurysms, including 47 (67.1% or 47/70) unruptured aneurysms and 23 (32.9% or 23/70) ruptured ones. The surgery was successful in 68 (97.1% or 68/70) patients, with a failure in two (2.9% or 2/70) patients. A 6 F guiding catheter was used in 28 (40% or 28/70) patients, and a 6 F intermediate catheter in 42 (60% or 42/70). Stent-assisted coiling was conducted in 50 (71.4% or 50/70) patients, and coiling alone in 20 (28.6% or 20/70). Immediately after embolization, complete occlusion was in 56 (80% or 56/70), neck remnant in 12 (17.1% or 12/70), and residual aneurysm sac in 2 (2.9% or 2/70). Periprocedural complications occurred in four (5.7% or 4/70) patients. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 54 (77.1% or 54/70) patients with 54 aneurysms, and the Raymond-Roy aneurysm occlusion classification was complete occlusion in 46 (85.2% or 46/54), neck remnant in 8 (14.8% or 14/54), and residual aneurysm sac in 0, which was not significantly (p = 0.16) different from that immediately after embolization.

Conclusion: The pigtail catheter assistance in guiding catheter navigation for embolizing anterior circulation aneurysms via the transradial access is safe and effective even though further confirmation is required.

猪尾导管在前循环动脉瘤经桡动脉栓塞治疗中的辅助引导作用。
背景:在经桡动脉通路前循环动脉瘤栓塞术中,纤尾导管辅助导管导航的效果和安全性尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评价经桡动脉通路引导导管在前循环动脉瘤栓塞治疗中的应用效果和安全性。方法:对70例经血管内栓塞治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者进行回顾性分析。对临床、血管内治疗及随访资料进行分析。结果:动脉瘤70例,其中未破裂动脉瘤47例(67.1%或47/70),破裂动脉瘤23例(32.9%或23/70)。68例(97.1%或68/70)患者手术成功,2例(2.9%或2/70)患者手术失败。28例(40%或28/70)患者使用6f导尿管,42例(60%或42/70)患者使用6f中间导管。支架辅助盘绕50例(71.4%或50/70),单独盘绕20例(28.6%或20/70)。栓塞后立即完全闭塞56例(80%或56/70),颈部残留12例(17.1%或12/70),残留动脉瘤囊2例(2.9%或2/70)。4例(5.7%或4/70)患者出现围手术期并发症。54例动脉瘤54例(77.1%或54/70)进行了6个月的血管造影随访,Raymond-Roy动脉瘤闭塞分型为完全闭塞46例(85.2%或46/54),颈部残留8例(14.8%或14/54),残留动脉瘤囊0例,与栓塞后即刻的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.16)。结论:经桡动脉入路,尾纤导管辅助导管导航栓塞前循环动脉瘤是安全有效的,但需进一步确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信