Zahra Raeisi, Shayan Rokhva, Fatemeh Rahmani, Ali Goodarzi, Hossein Najafzadeh
{"title":"Multi-label diagnosis of dental conditions from panoramic x-rays using attention-enhanced deep learning.","authors":"Zahra Raeisi, Shayan Rokhva, Fatemeh Rahmani, Ali Goodarzi, Hossein Najafzadeh","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01463-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate automated deep learning models for multi-class classification of dental conditions in panoramic X-ray images, comparing the effectiveness of custom CNN architectures with attention mechanisms, pre-trained models, and hybrid approaches.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A dataset of 1,512 panoramic dental X-rays was preprocessed through segmentation, creating 4,764 class-balanced images across four categories: Fillings, Cavity, Implant, and Impacted Tooth. Data augmentation and preprocessing techniques including brightness adjustment, CLAHE enhancement, and normalization were applied. Multiple architectures were evaluated: custom CNN with attention mechanism, pre-trained models (VGG16, ResNet50, Xception) with attention integration, and hybrid CNN-machine learning approaches (CNN + SVM, CNN + Random Forest, CNN + Decision Tree). Performance was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hybrid CNN + Random Forest model with preprocessing achieved the highest performance: 90.6% accuracy, 0.987 ROC-AUC, and 0.906 F1-score. Preprocessing consistently improved performance across all architectures, with accuracy gains ranging from 6.3% (VGG16) to 19.4% (ResNet50). The custom CNN with attention mechanism reached 86.0% accuracy, outperforming conventional CNN approaches (76.0%). Among pre-trained models, Xception with preprocessing achieved 79.8% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid CNN-machine learning approaches demonstrated superior performance for dental condition classification compared to end-to-end deep learning models. However, clinical implementation requires addressing the dataset limitation of lacking normal/healthy cases and conducting prospective validation studies across diverse clinical populations to establish real-world effectiveness and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01463-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate automated deep learning models for multi-class classification of dental conditions in panoramic X-ray images, comparing the effectiveness of custom CNN architectures with attention mechanisms, pre-trained models, and hybrid approaches.
Methodology: A dataset of 1,512 panoramic dental X-rays was preprocessed through segmentation, creating 4,764 class-balanced images across four categories: Fillings, Cavity, Implant, and Impacted Tooth. Data augmentation and preprocessing techniques including brightness adjustment, CLAHE enhancement, and normalization were applied. Multiple architectures were evaluated: custom CNN with attention mechanism, pre-trained models (VGG16, ResNet50, Xception) with attention integration, and hybrid CNN-machine learning approaches (CNN + SVM, CNN + Random Forest, CNN + Decision Tree). Performance was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics.
Results: The hybrid CNN + Random Forest model with preprocessing achieved the highest performance: 90.6% accuracy, 0.987 ROC-AUC, and 0.906 F1-score. Preprocessing consistently improved performance across all architectures, with accuracy gains ranging from 6.3% (VGG16) to 19.4% (ResNet50). The custom CNN with attention mechanism reached 86.0% accuracy, outperforming conventional CNN approaches (76.0%). Among pre-trained models, Xception with preprocessing achieved 79.8% accuracy.
Conclusion: Hybrid CNN-machine learning approaches demonstrated superior performance for dental condition classification compared to end-to-end deep learning models. However, clinical implementation requires addressing the dataset limitation of lacking normal/healthy cases and conducting prospective validation studies across diverse clinical populations to establish real-world effectiveness and safety.