July Silveira Gomes, Julia Diniz Grossi, Yanina Leon Uscapi, André Russowsky Brunoni, Ary Gadelha, Acioly Lt Lacerda
{"title":"EEG Changes in Schizophrenia Following tDCS: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"July Silveira Gomes, Julia Diniz Grossi, Yanina Leon Uscapi, André Russowsky Brunoni, Ary Gadelha, Acioly Lt Lacerda","doi":"10.1177/15500594251384350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated as an adjunct treatment in schizophrenia, but electroencephalographic (EEG) studies have produced inconsistent findings.ObjectiveTo review the literature and elucidate the effects of tDCS on EEG variables in schizophrenia. Method: This is a systematic scoping review according to PRISMA guidelines, consulting four databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. It was structured following PIO framework (Population, Intervention, Outcome): P: schizophrenia; I: tDCS; O: any EEG variable. For data synthesis, each time a variable was investigated, it was counted as an occurrence.ResultsA total of twenty-five papers were included, totaling forty-two occurrences: twenty-five were event-related potentials and seventeen were based on spectral/power, connectivity or coherence variables. Most papers applied 20 min of 2 mA stimulation (76%), in a bicephalic montage. The most investigated variable was the MMN, followed by N100, P300, EEG coherence, gamma activity, beta and alpha power. N100 was the variable that responded most to tDCS stimulation, with 80% response rate. Gamma activity had 67% response, MMN showed 60%, coherence, alpha and beta power 50%. All papers investigating P300 reported no significant results. Other EEG parameters were investigated only once.ConclusionEEG changes induced by tDCS in schizophrenia predominantly affected the sensory-auditory potential N100, had a lesser impact on pre-attentive potential MMN, and showed no observable effect on higher-order cognitive potentials, such as P300. The modulatory effects of tDCS on cognition are still unclear. This review was registered at the Open Science Framework (osf.io/7yzrj).</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594251384350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594251384350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated as an adjunct treatment in schizophrenia, but electroencephalographic (EEG) studies have produced inconsistent findings.ObjectiveTo review the literature and elucidate the effects of tDCS on EEG variables in schizophrenia. Method: This is a systematic scoping review according to PRISMA guidelines, consulting four databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. It was structured following PIO framework (Population, Intervention, Outcome): P: schizophrenia; I: tDCS; O: any EEG variable. For data synthesis, each time a variable was investigated, it was counted as an occurrence.ResultsA total of twenty-five papers were included, totaling forty-two occurrences: twenty-five were event-related potentials and seventeen were based on spectral/power, connectivity or coherence variables. Most papers applied 20 min of 2 mA stimulation (76%), in a bicephalic montage. The most investigated variable was the MMN, followed by N100, P300, EEG coherence, gamma activity, beta and alpha power. N100 was the variable that responded most to tDCS stimulation, with 80% response rate. Gamma activity had 67% response, MMN showed 60%, coherence, alpha and beta power 50%. All papers investigating P300 reported no significant results. Other EEG parameters were investigated only once.ConclusionEEG changes induced by tDCS in schizophrenia predominantly affected the sensory-auditory potential N100, had a lesser impact on pre-attentive potential MMN, and showed no observable effect on higher-order cognitive potentials, such as P300. The modulatory effects of tDCS on cognition are still unclear. This review was registered at the Open Science Framework (osf.io/7yzrj).
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为精神分裂症的辅助治疗进行了研究,但脑电图(EEG)研究产生了不一致的结果。目的回顾相关文献,探讨tDCS对精神分裂症脑电指标的影响。方法:根据PRISMA指南,参考PubMed (MEDLINE)、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和ScienceDirect四个数据库,进行系统的范围评估。其结构遵循PIO框架(人口,干预,结果):P:精神分裂症;我:tDCS;O:任何EEG变量。对于数据合成,每次调查一个变量时,它都被视为一个事件。结果共纳入25篇论文,共42篇,其中25篇是事件相关电位,17篇是基于谱/功率、连通性或相干性变量。大多数论文应用20分钟的2ma刺激(76%),在双头蒙太奇。研究最多的变量是MMN,其次是N100、P300、脑电相干性、伽马活动、β和α功率。N100是对tDCS刺激反应最大的变量,反应率为80%。γ活动反应67%,MMN反应60%,相干性、α和β功率反应50%。所有调查P300的论文均未报告显著结果。其他脑电参数仅检测一次。结论tDCS诱导的脑电变化主要影响感觉听觉电位N100,对前注意电位MMN影响较小,对P300等高阶认知电位无明显影响。tDCS对认知的调节作用尚不清楚。本综述已在开放科学框架(osf.io/7yzrj)上注册。