Perspectives From Alcohol and Drug Clinicians Towards the Introduction of Peer Worker Roles Within an Australian Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Service.

John Kelly, Emma Armitage
{"title":"Perspectives From Alcohol and Drug Clinicians Towards the Introduction of Peer Worker Roles Within an Australian Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Service.","authors":"John Kelly, Emma Armitage","doi":"10.1177/29767342251370470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the views and perspectives of alcohol and drug (AOD) clinicians regarding the introduction of a peer worker (PW) role within an Australian AOD treatment service, to identify strengths and barriers to guide the integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with AOD clinicians, using a brief, anonymous survey, to gather quantitative and qualitative insights into their perceptions of the strengths and barriers of introduction of a PW role within the service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 clinicians participated. Results indicated that 62% of clinicians believe that a PW would improve services delivered. Thematic analysis identified 3 main perceived strengths: (i) enhancing engagement and role modeling recovery; (ii) advocacy; and (iii) supporting teams and service culture. Four themes emerged as barriers/concerns: (i) role clarity and scope; (ii) organizational culture; (iii) boundaries; and (iv) PW well-being. Some differences were noted according to clinician's having prior experience working with PW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few studies have explored the perspectives of AOD clinicians regarding introducing PW roles in an AOD treatment setting. This study highlights that although a majority of AOD clinicians have positive attitudes, many have concerns regarding PW roles, role boundaries, and the legitimacy of peer expertise. Furthermore, organizational readiness, PW well-being, and the integration of PW and lived experience in recovery orientated care within the workplace were areas of concern. Addressing these within staff education and service planning, with organizational leadership, may help to support implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342251370470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251370470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the views and perspectives of alcohol and drug (AOD) clinicians regarding the introduction of a peer worker (PW) role within an Australian AOD treatment service, to identify strengths and barriers to guide the integration.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with AOD clinicians, using a brief, anonymous survey, to gather quantitative and qualitative insights into their perceptions of the strengths and barriers of introduction of a PW role within the service.

Results: A total of 53 clinicians participated. Results indicated that 62% of clinicians believe that a PW would improve services delivered. Thematic analysis identified 3 main perceived strengths: (i) enhancing engagement and role modeling recovery; (ii) advocacy; and (iii) supporting teams and service culture. Four themes emerged as barriers/concerns: (i) role clarity and scope; (ii) organizational culture; (iii) boundaries; and (iv) PW well-being. Some differences were noted according to clinician's having prior experience working with PW.

Conclusion: Few studies have explored the perspectives of AOD clinicians regarding introducing PW roles in an AOD treatment setting. This study highlights that although a majority of AOD clinicians have positive attitudes, many have concerns regarding PW roles, role boundaries, and the legitimacy of peer expertise. Furthermore, organizational readiness, PW well-being, and the integration of PW and lived experience in recovery orientated care within the workplace were areas of concern. Addressing these within staff education and service planning, with organizational leadership, may help to support implementation.

从酒精和药物临床医生的观点,在澳大利亚酒精和其他药物治疗服务中引入同伴工作角色。
目的:本研究的目的是调查酒精和药物(AOD)临床医生对在澳大利亚酒精和药物(AOD)治疗服务中引入同伴工作者(PW)角色的看法和观点,以确定指导整合的优势和障碍。方法:对AOD临床医生进行横断面调查,采用简短的匿名调查,收集定量和定性的见解,了解他们对在服务中引入PW角色的优势和障碍的看法。结果:共有53名临床医生参与。结果表明,62%的临床医生认为PW将改善所提供的服务。专题分析确定了3个可感知的主要优势:(i)加强参与和角色示范恢复;(2)宣传;(三)支持团队和服务文化。出现了四个障碍/关切的主题:(i)作用的明确性和范围;(二)组织文化;(3)边界;(iv) PW福利。根据临床医生先前处理PW的经验,我们注意到一些差异。结论:很少有研究探讨了AOD临床医生关于在AOD治疗环境中引入PW角色的观点。本研究强调,尽管大多数AOD临床医生持积极态度,但许多人对PW角色、角色界限和同伴专业知识的合法性存在担忧。此外,组织准备,PW福利,以及PW与工作场所康复导向护理的生活经验的整合是关注的领域。在组织领导下,在工作人员教育和服务规划中解决这些问题,可能有助于支持实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信