Evaluating the effects of air cushions on body pressure distribution and thermal insulation in evacuation shelters: A randomized controlled crossover study.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005259
Seiji Hamanishi, Shinsuke Sasaki
{"title":"Evaluating the effects of air cushions on body pressure distribution and thermal insulation in evacuation shelters: A randomized controlled crossover study.","authors":"Seiji Hamanishi, Shinsuke Sasaki","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In large-scale disasters such as the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, millions of evacuees are expected to remain in shelters, often sleeping on cold, hard floors in classrooms and gymnasiums, contributing to musculoskeletal pain and sleep disruption. While cardboard beds have been employed since the Great East Japan Earthquake due to their rapid mass-production capability, municipalities are not required to stockpile them, and many were unable to provide sufficient quantities during the Kumamoto Earthquake. Furthermore, the large size and weight of these beds complicate timely delivery, and their use alone provides only limited body pressure distribution. Consequently, there is concern that large-scale disasters will result in a severe shortage of appropriate bedding. This study aimed to determine whether air cushions can provide sufficient body pressure distribution and thermal insulation to serve as practical floor mats in evacuation shelters. Twenty healthy adults were enrolled in this randomized controlled crossover trial. Participants were instructed to lie on an air cushion, a urethane pad, and a plastic sheet, during which body pressure distribution was evaluated. Subjective perceptions of firmness and comfort were assessed using a numeric rating scale, and thermal insulation properties were evaluated by measuring surface temperature changes when each material was placed over a cooling gel pack. Compared with plastic sheets, the air cushion reduced mean body pressure by over 20% and increased contact area by more than 30%, with improvements exceeding those observed for urethane pads. Participants rated air cushions as significantly less firm and more comfortable than urethane pads. The air cushion also demonstrated thermal insulation comparable to urethane pads. These findings suggest that air cushions could serve as practical emergency floor mats in evacuation shelters, complementing cardboard beds and potentially reducing musculoskeletal strain and sleep disturbances in disaster settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0005259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In large-scale disasters such as the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, millions of evacuees are expected to remain in shelters, often sleeping on cold, hard floors in classrooms and gymnasiums, contributing to musculoskeletal pain and sleep disruption. While cardboard beds have been employed since the Great East Japan Earthquake due to their rapid mass-production capability, municipalities are not required to stockpile them, and many were unable to provide sufficient quantities during the Kumamoto Earthquake. Furthermore, the large size and weight of these beds complicate timely delivery, and their use alone provides only limited body pressure distribution. Consequently, there is concern that large-scale disasters will result in a severe shortage of appropriate bedding. This study aimed to determine whether air cushions can provide sufficient body pressure distribution and thermal insulation to serve as practical floor mats in evacuation shelters. Twenty healthy adults were enrolled in this randomized controlled crossover trial. Participants were instructed to lie on an air cushion, a urethane pad, and a plastic sheet, during which body pressure distribution was evaluated. Subjective perceptions of firmness and comfort were assessed using a numeric rating scale, and thermal insulation properties were evaluated by measuring surface temperature changes when each material was placed over a cooling gel pack. Compared with plastic sheets, the air cushion reduced mean body pressure by over 20% and increased contact area by more than 30%, with improvements exceeding those observed for urethane pads. Participants rated air cushions as significantly less firm and more comfortable than urethane pads. The air cushion also demonstrated thermal insulation comparable to urethane pads. These findings suggest that air cushions could serve as practical emergency floor mats in evacuation shelters, complementing cardboard beds and potentially reducing musculoskeletal strain and sleep disturbances in disaster settings.

评估气垫对疏散避难所体压分布和隔热的影响:一项随机对照交叉研究。
在像预期中的南开海槽地震这样的大规模灾害中,数百万撤离者预计将留在避难所,经常睡在教室和体育馆冰冷坚硬的地板上,导致肌肉骨骼疼痛和睡眠中断。虽然自东日本大地震以来,由于其快速批量生产的能力,纸板床一直在使用,但市政当局不需要储存它们,许多地方在熊本地震期间无法提供足够的数量。此外,这些床的大尺寸和重量使及时交付复杂化,而且它们的单独使用只能提供有限的身体压力分布。因此,人们担心大规模的灾害将导致严重缺乏适当的垫层。本研究旨在确定气垫是否可以提供足够的人体压力分布和隔热,作为实用的地垫在疏散避难所。20名健康成人参加了这项随机对照交叉试验。参与者被要求躺在气垫、聚氨酯垫和塑料片上,在此期间评估身体压力分布。主观感知的坚固性和舒适性的评估使用数字评级量表,并通过测量表面温度的变化来评估保温性能,当每个材料放置在一个冷却凝胶包。与塑料板相比,气垫降低了20%以上的平均身体压力,增加了30%以上的接触面积,其改善程度超过了聚氨酯垫。参与者认为气垫比聚氨酯垫牢固得多,舒适得多。气垫也证明隔热媲美聚氨酯垫。这些研究结果表明,气垫可以作为疏散避难所的实用紧急地垫,补充硬纸板床,并有可能减少灾难环境中的肌肉骨骼紧张和睡眠障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信