Disentangling temporal integration and segregation in multiple object individuation.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yue Huang, Fengxiao Hao, Min Li, Hexing Zhong, Zhangjing Ma, Zhao Fan, Xianfeng Ding, Xiaorong Cheng
{"title":"Disentangling temporal integration and segregation in multiple object individuation.","authors":"Yue Huang, Fengxiao Hao, Min Li, Hexing Zhong, Zhangjing Ma, Zhao Fan, Xianfeng Ding, Xiaorong Cheng","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.12.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Object individuation, the process of endowing visual elements with objecthood, is known to have a limited capacity, as demonstrated by the subitizing phenomenon-the rapid and precise enumeration of small quantities (up to three or four items). Previous research has primarily focused on multiple object individuation when components defining each object are presented simultaneously. However, the impact of temporal factors remains understudied. This study investigates the role of temporal processing modes in subitizing. Specifically, we investigated whether subitizing remains feasible and maintains a comparable capacity when object-defining components are presented at different times and need to be either combined into a single object (temporal integration) or separated into distinct objects (temporal segregation). Across two experiments using paradigms based on the missing/odd element task, the impact of different temporal operations (integration vs. segregation) on subitizing was examined after task difficulty was equalized by individually-adjusted inter-stimulus intervals. The results revealed that subitizing is a ubiquitous phenomenon even when target components are presented at different times. Critically, whether these components are temporally integrable or separable influences subitizing capacity. Temporal segregation exhibited a higher subitizing capacity and lower cognitive resource demands than temporal integration, likely because it prioritizes perceptual sensitivity to change over maintaining perceptual continuity and stability during the initial stage of object individuation. Additionally, temporal integration-based subitizing benefits more from an increased repetition of displays than temporal segregation-based subitizing. These findings demonstrate that task-dependent temporal processing modes modulate the efficiency and capacity of numerical individuation, underscoring the importance of temporal organization in multiple object individuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 12","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.12.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Object individuation, the process of endowing visual elements with objecthood, is known to have a limited capacity, as demonstrated by the subitizing phenomenon-the rapid and precise enumeration of small quantities (up to three or four items). Previous research has primarily focused on multiple object individuation when components defining each object are presented simultaneously. However, the impact of temporal factors remains understudied. This study investigates the role of temporal processing modes in subitizing. Specifically, we investigated whether subitizing remains feasible and maintains a comparable capacity when object-defining components are presented at different times and need to be either combined into a single object (temporal integration) or separated into distinct objects (temporal segregation). Across two experiments using paradigms based on the missing/odd element task, the impact of different temporal operations (integration vs. segregation) on subitizing was examined after task difficulty was equalized by individually-adjusted inter-stimulus intervals. The results revealed that subitizing is a ubiquitous phenomenon even when target components are presented at different times. Critically, whether these components are temporally integrable or separable influences subitizing capacity. Temporal segregation exhibited a higher subitizing capacity and lower cognitive resource demands than temporal integration, likely because it prioritizes perceptual sensitivity to change over maintaining perceptual continuity and stability during the initial stage of object individuation. Additionally, temporal integration-based subitizing benefits more from an increased repetition of displays than temporal segregation-based subitizing. These findings demonstrate that task-dependent temporal processing modes modulate the efficiency and capacity of numerical individuation, underscoring the importance of temporal organization in multiple object individuation.

多目标个性化中的时间整合与分离。
对象个性化,即赋予视觉元素客体性的过程,被认为具有有限的能力,这可以从细分现象——快速而精确地列举少量(最多三到四件物品)——中得到证明。以往的研究主要集中在定义每个对象的组件同时呈现时的多对象个性化。然而,时间因素的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究探讨了时间加工模式在主观化中的作用。具体来说,我们研究了当对象定义组件在不同时间出现,需要组合成单个对象(时间整合)或分离成不同对象(时间隔离)时,细分是否仍然可行并保持相当的能力。通过两个基于缺失/奇数元素任务范式的实验,通过个体调整的刺激间间隔均衡任务难度后,研究了不同时间操作(整合与分离)对主观化的影响。结果表明,即使目标成分在不同时间出现,subsubization也是一种普遍现象。至关重要的是,这些组成部分是否在时间上可积或可分离影响subsubization能力。与时间整合相比,时间分离表现出更高的细分能力和更低的认知资源需求,这可能是因为在对象个性化的初始阶段,它优先考虑对变化的感知敏感性,而不是保持感知的连续性和稳定性。此外,与基于时间隔离的细分相比,基于时间整合的细分从不断增加的重复显示中获益更多。这些研究结果表明,任务依赖的时间加工模式调节了数字个性化的效率和能力,强调了时间组织在多目标个性化中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信