Alternative nicotine delivery systems: current evidence.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
J Malinovská, M Lustigová, M Koželuhová, V Puchnerová, J Urbanová, O Hloch, S Pálová, L Rozsíval, J Brož
{"title":"Alternative nicotine delivery systems: current evidence.","authors":"J Malinovská, M Lustigová, M Koželuhová, V Puchnerová, J Urbanová, O Hloch, S Pálová, L Rozsíval, J Brož","doi":"10.61568/emi/11-6568/20250808/141317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative nicotine delivery products (ANDS) have gained popularity in recent years. Their potentially lower harm compared to traditional cigarettes and the possibility of using them as part of a harm-reduction strategy in tobacco addiction treatment have been discussed. Current epidemiological trends show a gradual increase in ANDS use by the general population, especially among adolescents and young adults, but also among non-smokers. The most comprehensive evidence regarding health effects is available for e-cigarettes, which suggests that their use does not increase cardiovascular risk, except for hypertension, compared to non-smokers, and reduces the risk of respiratory diseases compared to smoking traditional cigarettes; however, long-term data are lacking for older individuals. In the case of heated tobacco products, there is not enough reliable evidence on health risks compared to current smokers or non-smokers, while concerns remain about the potential toxicity of substances found in these products but absent in cigarette smoke. For nicotine pouches, there is a lack of reliable evidence on long-term effects. Electronic cigarettes are used as a smoking cessation tool in some countries, such as the UK. Existing evidence leans towards the potential use of e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction strategy, although there is currently no global consensus on their role in tobacco addiction treatment. Complete cessation of all tobacco and nicotine products remains the primary recommended approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":54374,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie","volume":"74 3","pages":"175-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61568/emi/11-6568/20250808/141317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative nicotine delivery products (ANDS) have gained popularity in recent years. Their potentially lower harm compared to traditional cigarettes and the possibility of using them as part of a harm-reduction strategy in tobacco addiction treatment have been discussed. Current epidemiological trends show a gradual increase in ANDS use by the general population, especially among adolescents and young adults, but also among non-smokers. The most comprehensive evidence regarding health effects is available for e-cigarettes, which suggests that their use does not increase cardiovascular risk, except for hypertension, compared to non-smokers, and reduces the risk of respiratory diseases compared to smoking traditional cigarettes; however, long-term data are lacking for older individuals. In the case of heated tobacco products, there is not enough reliable evidence on health risks compared to current smokers or non-smokers, while concerns remain about the potential toxicity of substances found in these products but absent in cigarette smoke. For nicotine pouches, there is a lack of reliable evidence on long-term effects. Electronic cigarettes are used as a smoking cessation tool in some countries, such as the UK. Existing evidence leans towards the potential use of e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction strategy, although there is currently no global consensus on their role in tobacco addiction treatment. Complete cessation of all tobacco and nicotine products remains the primary recommended approach.

替代尼古丁输送系统:目前的证据。
替代尼古丁输送产品(ANDS)近年来越来越受欢迎。与传统香烟相比,它们的潜在危害较低,并讨论了将它们作为烟草成瘾治疗中减少危害战略的一部分的可能性。目前的流行病学趋势表明,一般人群,特别是青少年和青壮年,但也包括非吸烟者,使用麻醉药的人数逐渐增加。有关电子烟对健康影响的最全面证据表明,与不吸烟者相比,电子烟的使用不会增加心血管疾病风险(高血压除外),与吸传统香烟相比,电子烟的使用会降低患呼吸道疾病的风险;然而,缺乏老年人的长期数据。就加热烟草制品而言,与目前的吸烟者或不吸烟者相比,没有足够可靠的证据表明其健康风险,而人们仍然担心这些产品中发现的物质可能具有毒性,但香烟烟雾中没有这种物质。对于尼古丁袋,缺乏长期影响的可靠证据。在英国等一些国家,电子烟被用作戒烟工具。现有证据倾向于使用电子烟作为一种减少危害的策略,尽管目前全球还没有就电子烟在烟草成瘾治疗中的作用达成共识。完全停止所有烟草和尼古丁产品仍然是主要推荐的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie
Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers, information from practice, reviews on epidemiological and microbiological subjects. Sufficient space is devoted to diagnostic methods from medical microbiology, parasitology, immunology, and to general aspects and discussions pertaining to preventive medicine. It also brings translations and book reviews useful for medical doctors and research workers and professionals in public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信