Patient Advocacy Group Leaders' Perceptions on Primary Care's Role in Caring for Patients With a History of Breast Cancer

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kacie Barry, Sarah J. Fadem, Jennifer R. Hemler, Jenna Howard, Lisa Mikesell, Denalee M. O'Malley, Shawna V. Hudson, Benjamin F. Crabtree
{"title":"Patient Advocacy Group Leaders' Perceptions on Primary Care's Role in Caring for Patients With a History of Breast Cancer","authors":"Kacie Barry,&nbsp;Sarah J. Fadem,&nbsp;Jennifer R. Hemler,&nbsp;Jenna Howard,&nbsp;Lisa Mikesell,&nbsp;Denalee M. O'Malley,&nbsp;Shawna V. Hudson,&nbsp;Benjamin F. Crabtree","doi":"10.1111/hex.70458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer advocacy groups engage patients, families and caregivers in navigating the cancer landscape, with a focus on early detection/screening and providing psychosocial and financial support during and after treatment. These groups are influential among their communities, funders and policymakers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We wished to understand perceptions of breast cancer advocacy group leaders on primary care's role in breast cancer survivorship care, given limited primary care engagement despite endorsement by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>As part of a larger NCI-funded study, we used purposive sampling to select leaders from a diversity of patient advocacy groups for in-depth interviews (<i>n</i> = 9). After obtaining consent, interviews were conducted and recorded on Zoom, professionally transcribed, and analysed using an established immersion–crystallisation process to identify themes and patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed leaders (<i>n</i> = 9) from two local, three regional and four national advocacy groups, five of whom had personal experiences with breast cancer. These advocates emphasised that transitions away from the safety of oncology to primary care are difficult for patients. They felt patients with a history of breast cancer have unique and complex needs that are different from the standards of care found within primary care settings, and primary care clinicians are not adequately prepared to address these. In reflecting on the ideal role of primary care, they highlighted listening to patients, identifying issues and referring patients to appropriate specialists, but ultimately stressed that patients needed to advocate for themselves in the current healthcare environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Advocacy groups typically start as grass root efforts motivated by perceptions of inadequate support and care for cancer patients. As such, there is potential for advocacy groups to shape the conversation to improve collaboration between oncology and primary care by articulating and advocating for better primary care involvement in survivorship care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The project's steering committee included cancer survivors and cancer advocacy group leaders who provided feedback on the project design and made recommendations for people to interview. Steering committee retreats were later held after the completion of interviews to reflect on emerging findings and plan dissemination strategies. The study team included a cancer survivor and several members whose immediate family members had a history of cancer. They were actively engaged in the design, analysis and manuscript writing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer advocacy groups engage patients, families and caregivers in navigating the cancer landscape, with a focus on early detection/screening and providing psychosocial and financial support during and after treatment. These groups are influential among their communities, funders and policymakers.

Objective

We wished to understand perceptions of breast cancer advocacy group leaders on primary care's role in breast cancer survivorship care, given limited primary care engagement despite endorsement by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Methods

As part of a larger NCI-funded study, we used purposive sampling to select leaders from a diversity of patient advocacy groups for in-depth interviews (n = 9). After obtaining consent, interviews were conducted and recorded on Zoom, professionally transcribed, and analysed using an established immersion–crystallisation process to identify themes and patterns.

Results

We interviewed leaders (n = 9) from two local, three regional and four national advocacy groups, five of whom had personal experiences with breast cancer. These advocates emphasised that transitions away from the safety of oncology to primary care are difficult for patients. They felt patients with a history of breast cancer have unique and complex needs that are different from the standards of care found within primary care settings, and primary care clinicians are not adequately prepared to address these. In reflecting on the ideal role of primary care, they highlighted listening to patients, identifying issues and referring patients to appropriate specialists, but ultimately stressed that patients needed to advocate for themselves in the current healthcare environment.

Conclusions

Advocacy groups typically start as grass root efforts motivated by perceptions of inadequate support and care for cancer patients. As such, there is potential for advocacy groups to shape the conversation to improve collaboration between oncology and primary care by articulating and advocating for better primary care involvement in survivorship care.

Patient or Public Contribution

The project's steering committee included cancer survivors and cancer advocacy group leaders who provided feedback on the project design and made recommendations for people to interview. Steering committee retreats were later held after the completion of interviews to reflect on emerging findings and plan dissemination strategies. The study team included a cancer survivor and several members whose immediate family members had a history of cancer. They were actively engaged in the design, analysis and manuscript writing.

Abstract Image

患者倡导小组领导人对初级保健在照顾有乳腺癌病史的患者中的作用的看法。
背景:癌症倡导组织让患者、家属和护理人员参与到癌症环境的导航中,重点是早期发现/筛查,并在治疗期间和治疗后提供社会心理和经济支持。这些团体在他们的社区、资助者和决策者中具有影响力。目的:我们希望了解乳腺癌倡导团体领导人对初级保健在乳腺癌生存护理中的作用的看法,尽管得到了国家癌症研究所(NCI)的认可,但初级保健参与有限。方法:作为一项较大的nci资助研究的一部分,我们使用有目的的抽样从不同的患者倡导团体中选择领导者进行深入访谈(n = 9)。在获得同意后,在Zoom上进行采访并记录,专业转录,并使用既定的浸入结晶过程进行分析,以确定主题和模式。结果:我们采访了来自两个地方、三个区域和四个国家倡导团体的领导人(n = 9),其中五个有乳腺癌的个人经历。这些倡导者强调,对患者来说,从肿瘤安全转向初级保健是困难的。他们认为,有乳腺癌病史的患者有独特而复杂的需求,与初级保健机构的护理标准不同,初级保健临床医生没有做好充分的准备来解决这些问题。在反思初级保健的理想作用时,他们强调倾听患者的意见,确定问题并将患者转介给适当的专家,但最终强调患者需要在当前的医疗保健环境中为自己辩护。结论:倡导团体通常从基层努力开始,因为他们认为对癌症患者的支持和护理不足。因此,倡导团体有可能通过阐明和倡导更好的初级保健参与生存护理来塑造对话,以改善肿瘤学和初级保健之间的合作。患者或公众贡献:该项目的指导委员会包括癌症幸存者和癌症倡导团体的领导人,他们对项目设计提供反馈,并为人们提供采访建议。指导委员会后来在访谈结束后举行了务静会,以反思新出现的调查结果并规划传播战略。研究小组包括一名癌症幸存者和几名直系亲属有癌症病史的成员。他们积极参与设计、分析和撰写稿件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信