Klemens Paul Kaiser, Thilo Demeter, Timo Drissler, Maria Fronius, Christoph Lwowski, Michael Müller, Thomas Kohnen, Jochen Triesch, Yaroslava Wenner
{"title":"Intra-observer reliability of the Harms tangent screen test.","authors":"Klemens Paul Kaiser, Thilo Demeter, Timo Drissler, Maria Fronius, Christoph Lwowski, Michael Müller, Thomas Kohnen, Jochen Triesch, Yaroslava Wenner","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2570226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the intra-observer reliability of the Harms Tangent Screen Test (HTS) for ocular motility analysis in eyes with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective clinical case study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Squint angles were assessed subjectively in patients aged ≥18 years, presenting with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus, using HTS across nine diagnostic gaze positions (0°; 25°). Repeatability was assessed by performing two consecutive measurements per patient by the same examiner. Measurement consistency was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 patients (46.6% women) with a mean age of 54.0 ± 17.12 years were included. ICCs were highest for the horizontal squint angles of the nine gaze positions (≥0.99), followed by the vertical (0.96-0.99) and the torsional squint angles (0.93-0.98). Mean difference between the two measurements was ≤0.5° for the primary gaze position across all directions. LOA ranged from -3.1°; 2.9° (horizontal), -2.0°; 2.2° (vertical), and -3.6°; 3.1° (torsional). Maximum differences between the two measurements in the primary gaze position were ±8.0° (horizontal), ±5.0° (vertical), and ±6.0° (torsional).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HTS demonstrates good repeatability across all nine gaze positions in the horizontal, vertical, or torsional squint angles, indicating consistent measurement reliability regardless of gaze position.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2570226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the intra-observer reliability of the Harms Tangent Screen Test (HTS) for ocular motility analysis in eyes with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus.
Methods: This prospective clinical case study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Squint angles were assessed subjectively in patients aged ≥18 years, presenting with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus, using HTS across nine diagnostic gaze positions (0°; 25°). Repeatability was assessed by performing two consecutive measurements per patient by the same examiner. Measurement consistency was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA).
Results: A total of 58 patients (46.6% women) with a mean age of 54.0 ± 17.12 years were included. ICCs were highest for the horizontal squint angles of the nine gaze positions (≥0.99), followed by the vertical (0.96-0.99) and the torsional squint angles (0.93-0.98). Mean difference between the two measurements was ≤0.5° for the primary gaze position across all directions. LOA ranged from -3.1°; 2.9° (horizontal), -2.0°; 2.2° (vertical), and -3.6°; 3.1° (torsional). Maximum differences between the two measurements in the primary gaze position were ±8.0° (horizontal), ±5.0° (vertical), and ±6.0° (torsional).
Conclusion: The HTS demonstrates good repeatability across all nine gaze positions in the horizontal, vertical, or torsional squint angles, indicating consistent measurement reliability regardless of gaze position.