The efficacy of using psychotherapy treatments to minimize symptoms of rumination disorder: A scoping review.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mohammad A Abu Sabra, Hasan Abualruz, Mohamed A Zoromba, Heba E El-Gazar
{"title":"The efficacy of using psychotherapy treatments to minimize symptoms of rumination disorder: A scoping review.","authors":"Mohammad A Abu Sabra, Hasan Abualruz, Mohamed A Zoromba, Heba E El-Gazar","doi":"10.1177/13591053251375324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rumination disorder (RD) is characterized by the persistent, recurrent, and effortless regurgitation of swallowed food back into the mouth. it is associated with various illnesses. RD is frequently misdiagnosed or ignored; this causes patients to have persistent discomfort and spend extended periods without therapy. Numerous attempts have been made to create and enhance psychotherapy interventions to lessen the symptoms of rumination, but the answer is still unknown. Thus, this scoping review was conducted to assess the efficacy of psychotherapy treatments in reducing symptoms of rumination disorder. A total of 27 studies that met the eligibility criteria found that psychotherapy treatments were effective in reducing rumination symptoms. CBT was the most commonly used type of therapy, followed by COMET, MBCT, ACT, rTMS, TDCS, and DBT. Psychotherapy is a contemporary therapeutic approach that has been recognized as an effective way to provide long-term positive results for people with RD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251375324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251375324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rumination disorder (RD) is characterized by the persistent, recurrent, and effortless regurgitation of swallowed food back into the mouth. it is associated with various illnesses. RD is frequently misdiagnosed or ignored; this causes patients to have persistent discomfort and spend extended periods without therapy. Numerous attempts have been made to create and enhance psychotherapy interventions to lessen the symptoms of rumination, but the answer is still unknown. Thus, this scoping review was conducted to assess the efficacy of psychotherapy treatments in reducing symptoms of rumination disorder. A total of 27 studies that met the eligibility criteria found that psychotherapy treatments were effective in reducing rumination symptoms. CBT was the most commonly used type of therapy, followed by COMET, MBCT, ACT, rTMS, TDCS, and DBT. Psychotherapy is a contemporary therapeutic approach that has been recognized as an effective way to provide long-term positive results for people with RD.

使用心理疗法减少反刍障碍症状的疗效:范围回顾。
反刍障碍(RD)的特点是持续、反复、毫不费力地将吞咽的食物反刍回嘴里。它与各种疾病有关。RD经常被误诊或忽视;这会导致患者持续不适,并且长时间不接受治疗。人们已经做了很多尝试来创造和加强心理治疗干预,以减轻反刍的症状,但答案仍然未知。因此,本综述旨在评估心理治疗在减轻反刍障碍症状方面的疗效。共有27项符合资格标准的研究发现,心理治疗在减少反刍症状方面是有效的。CBT是最常用的治疗类型,其次是COMET、MBCT、ACT、rTMS、TDCS和DBT。心理治疗是一种当代治疗方法,已被认为是为RD患者提供长期积极结果的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信