Application of a denoising doppler algorithm in adnexal masses ultrasound: impact on color score attribution and perceived image quality.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Alessandro Arena, Marisol Doglioli, Luca Fuso, Lucia De Meis, Francesca Salis, Flavia De Simone, Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti, Daniele Conti, Renato Seracchioli, Paolo Casadio, Roberta Massobrio, Annamaria Ferrero, Luca Liban Mariani
{"title":"Application of a denoising doppler algorithm in adnexal masses ultrasound: impact on color score attribution and perceived image quality.","authors":"Alessandro Arena, Marisol Doglioli, Luca Fuso, Lucia De Meis, Francesca Salis, Flavia De Simone, Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti, Daniele Conti, Renato Seracchioli, Paolo Casadio, Roberta Massobrio, Annamaria Ferrero, Luca Liban Mariani","doi":"10.1055/a-2716-6560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vascularization assessment is crucial for ovarian masses diagnosis; however, its subjectivity often results in suboptimal interobserver agreement. This study evaluated the impact of the OvAi denoising algorithm on IOTA color score assignment and perceived image quality in adnexal mass ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective study (May 2018-August 2022), color/power Doppler videos of 100 adnexal masses from 100 women were acquired in two outpatient clinics. Six experts, five mid-experienced, and eight beginner examiners assessed IOTA color score and image quality before and after applying the denoising algorithm. Interobserver agreement on color score assignments was measured using Fleiss' Kappa; perceived image quality changes were tested via Chi-square.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver agreement for color score assignment was fair across all observer groups (κ: 0.296-0.396) and unchanged post-denoising. In benign lesions, CS1 increased (+14.9%), while CS2-CS4 decreased. In malignant cases, CS1 and CS2 rose (+76.2% and +30.8%), with smaller reduction in CS3 (-3.7%) and CS4 (-21.4%). The CS4 decrease was less marked in malignant than in benign lesions (-21.4% vs -38.3%). A significant improvement in perceived image quality was observed in all observer groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OvAi algorithm improved perceived image quality without significantly impacting interobserver agreement. Continued development may enable more objective and automated color score assignments, potentially reducing interobserver variability and supporting diagnostic reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2716-6560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vascularization assessment is crucial for ovarian masses diagnosis; however, its subjectivity often results in suboptimal interobserver agreement. This study evaluated the impact of the OvAi denoising algorithm on IOTA color score assignment and perceived image quality in adnexal mass ultrasound.

Materials and methods: In this multicenter prospective study (May 2018-August 2022), color/power Doppler videos of 100 adnexal masses from 100 women were acquired in two outpatient clinics. Six experts, five mid-experienced, and eight beginner examiners assessed IOTA color score and image quality before and after applying the denoising algorithm. Interobserver agreement on color score assignments was measured using Fleiss' Kappa; perceived image quality changes were tested via Chi-square.

Results: Interobserver agreement for color score assignment was fair across all observer groups (κ: 0.296-0.396) and unchanged post-denoising. In benign lesions, CS1 increased (+14.9%), while CS2-CS4 decreased. In malignant cases, CS1 and CS2 rose (+76.2% and +30.8%), with smaller reduction in CS3 (-3.7%) and CS4 (-21.4%). The CS4 decrease was less marked in malignant than in benign lesions (-21.4% vs -38.3%). A significant improvement in perceived image quality was observed in all observer groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The OvAi algorithm improved perceived image quality without significantly impacting interobserver agreement. Continued development may enable more objective and automated color score assignments, potentially reducing interobserver variability and supporting diagnostic reliability.

多普勒降噪算法在附件肿块超声中的应用:对颜色评分归属和感知图像质量的影响。
目的:血管化评估是卵巢肿块诊断的重要依据;然而,它的主观性往往导致次优的观察者之间的协议。本研究评估了OvAi去噪算法对附件肿块超声中IOTA颜色评分分配和感知图像质量的影响。材料和方法:在这项多中心前瞻性研究中(2018年5月- 2022年8月),在两个门诊获得了100名女性的100个附件肿块的彩色/功率多普勒视频。6名专家、5名中级经验者和8名初级审查员分别对应用去噪算法前后的IOTA颜色评分和图像质量进行了评估。使用Fleiss' Kappa测量观察者对颜色评分分配的一致性;感知图像质量变化通过卡方检验。结果:观察者间对颜色评分分配的一致性在所有观察组中都是公平的(κ: 0.296-0.396),并且在去噪后没有变化。在良性病变中,CS1升高(+14.9%),CS2-CS4降低。在恶性病例中,CS1和CS2升高(+76.2%和+30.8%),CS3和CS4降低较小(-3.7%)和CS4(-21.4%)。CS4在恶性病变中的下降幅度小于良性病变(-21.4% vs -38.3%)。观察组患者感知图像质量均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:OvAi算法在不显著影响观察者间一致性的情况下提高了感知图像质量。继续发展可能会使更客观和自动化的颜色评分分配,潜在地减少观察者之间的可变性和支持诊断的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信