Promoting equitable access to infection prevention for people with different vulnerabilities: a scoping review.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Chiara Moreal, Beata Dobrowolska, Patrycja Ozdoba, Marta Szara, Nevenka Kregar Velikonja, Mateja Šimec, Gorazd Laznik, Sabina Krsnik, Anna Escofet Roig, Mireia Esparza, Maria Montserrat Solà-Pola, Aysel Özsaban, Aysun Bayram, Alvisa Palese, Stefania Chiappinotto
{"title":"Promoting equitable access to infection prevention for people with different vulnerabilities: a scoping review.","authors":"Chiara Moreal, Beata Dobrowolska, Patrycja Ozdoba, Marta Szara, Nevenka Kregar Velikonja, Mateja Šimec, Gorazd Laznik, Sabina Krsnik, Anna Escofet Roig, Mireia Esparza, Maria Montserrat Solà-Pola, Aysel Özsaban, Aysun Bayram, Alvisa Palese, Stefania Chiappinotto","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03773-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational health interventions play a crucial role in the prevention of respiratory infections, particularly among people with vulnerabilities, who bear a disproportionate burden, which can lead to severe complications such as increased morbidity and mortality. Tailored educational approaches, including digital interventions, are essential to engage and empower these groups, promote self-care behaviors, and reduce health inequities. Despite their significance, evidence on educational interventions, particularly those leveraging digital platforms, has yet to be systematically mapped. To identify and analyze existing educational interventions designed to foster self-care behaviors and prevent respiratory infections among people with vulnerabilities in community settings was the intent of this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA-ScR checklist was followed to conduct this scoping review. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus, supplemented by grey literature and reference screening. Studies involving educational interventions for people with vulnerabilities in community settings were included, with no publication date restrictions. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework on February 21, 2024. Data extracted were narratively synthesized, focusing on interventions characteristics, different populations included, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included, reporting in-person education, tailored materials, e-health, telehealth, digital and computer-based educational interventions. Older adults, children, individuals with chronic conditions, and groups with socioeconomic vulnerabilities were involved. Interventions have triggered significant improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and preventive behaviors. Digital approaches enhanced outreach and engagement but revealed barriers such as technological disparities due to limited digital literacy among people with vulnerabilities. In-person and culturally tailored interventions proved effective in promoting behavior change, particularly when aligned with community needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tailored, community-based and hybrid approaches that combine face-to-face and digital components are recommended to close knowledge and behavioral gaps regarding preventive measures against respiratory infections in people with different vulnerabilities. However, there are challenges such as inequality in digital access and variability in intervention outcomes that suggest hybrid models and culturally sensitive approaches. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impact of these strategies on reducing respiratory infections and improving health equity.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03773-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educational health interventions play a crucial role in the prevention of respiratory infections, particularly among people with vulnerabilities, who bear a disproportionate burden, which can lead to severe complications such as increased morbidity and mortality. Tailored educational approaches, including digital interventions, are essential to engage and empower these groups, promote self-care behaviors, and reduce health inequities. Despite their significance, evidence on educational interventions, particularly those leveraging digital platforms, has yet to be systematically mapped. To identify and analyze existing educational interventions designed to foster self-care behaviors and prevent respiratory infections among people with vulnerabilities in community settings was the intent of this study.

Methods: The PRISMA-ScR checklist was followed to conduct this scoping review. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus, supplemented by grey literature and reference screening. Studies involving educational interventions for people with vulnerabilities in community settings were included, with no publication date restrictions. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework on February 21, 2024. Data extracted were narratively synthesized, focusing on interventions characteristics, different populations included, and outcomes.

Results: Twelve studies were included, reporting in-person education, tailored materials, e-health, telehealth, digital and computer-based educational interventions. Older adults, children, individuals with chronic conditions, and groups with socioeconomic vulnerabilities were involved. Interventions have triggered significant improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and preventive behaviors. Digital approaches enhanced outreach and engagement but revealed barriers such as technological disparities due to limited digital literacy among people with vulnerabilities. In-person and culturally tailored interventions proved effective in promoting behavior change, particularly when aligned with community needs.

Conclusions: Tailored, community-based and hybrid approaches that combine face-to-face and digital components are recommended to close knowledge and behavioral gaps regarding preventive measures against respiratory infections in people with different vulnerabilities. However, there are challenges such as inequality in digital access and variability in intervention outcomes that suggest hybrid models and culturally sensitive approaches. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impact of these strategies on reducing respiratory infections and improving health equity.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

促进不同脆弱性人群公平获得感染预防:范围审查。
背景:教育保健干预措施在预防呼吸道感染方面发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在脆弱人群中,他们承受着不成比例的负担,这可能导致严重的并发症,如发病率和死亡率增加。量身定制的教育方法,包括数字干预措施,对于这些群体的参与和赋权、促进自我保健行为和减少卫生不公平现象至关重要。尽管它们意义重大,但有关教育干预的证据,特别是那些利用数字平台的证据,尚未被系统地绘制出来。本研究的目的是识别和分析现有的教育干预措施,旨在促进社区环境中弱势群体的自我护理行为和预防呼吸道感染。方法:按照PRISMA-ScR检查表进行范围审查。在PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane和Scopus中进行系统检索,并辅以灰色文献和参考文献筛选。包括对社区环境中弱势群体进行教育干预的研究,没有出版日期限制。该审查方案于2024年2月21日在开放科学框架中注册。提取的数据以叙述性的方式综合,重点放在干预措施的特点、不同的人群和结果上。结果:纳入了12项研究,报告了面对面教育、量身定制的材料、电子保健、远程保健、数字和基于计算机的教育干预措施。涉及老年人、儿童、慢性病患者和社会经济弱势群体。干预措施已促使人们在知识、态度和预防行为方面取得重大进展。数字方法加强了外联和参与,但也暴露了由于弱势群体数字素养有限而导致的技术差距等障碍。事实证明,针对个人和文化的干预措施在促进行为改变方面是有效的,特别是在符合社区需求的情况下。结论:建议结合面对面和数字组件的定制、基于社区和混合方法,以缩小不同脆弱性人群在预防呼吸道感染方面的知识和行为差距。然而,数字接入方面的不平等和干预结果的可变性等挑战建议采用混合模式和文化敏感方法。需要进一步的研究来评估这些战略对减少呼吸道感染和改善卫生公平的长期影响。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信