Healthcare provider perspectives on Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) use in Danish HIV care - A qualitative focus group study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Olivia Borchmann, Nina Weis, Ann-Brit E Hansen, Merete Storgaard, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Ellen Moseholm
{"title":"Healthcare provider perspectives on Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) use in Danish HIV care - A qualitative focus group study.","authors":"Olivia Borchmann, Nina Weis, Ann-Brit E Hansen, Merete Storgaard, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Ellen Moseholm","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2570406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in HIV care may contribute to a more holistic approach. There is no gold standard of PRO measures that best reflect the concerns and needs of people with HIV, because these may vary depending on healthcare contexts. The aim of this study was to explore HIV healthcare providers' (HCPs') experiences regarding the concerns and needs of people with HIV, and their perspectives on the use of PROs in HIV care. This was a single-centre, Danish qualitative study. We included nine HCPs in two focus group discussions, which followed an interview guide. Data were thematically analyzed following Interpretive Description framework. We identified three main themes: 1: <i>People with HIV have varying healthcare needs.</i> 2: <i>Beyond biomedical care - within the current clinical framework.</i> 3: <i>Ambivalence towards PROs</i>. The healthcare needs of people with HIV vary and depend on their social circumstances. HCPs try to have a holistic approach, but they are limited by a lack of time and resources in the healthcare system. HCPs were generally positive about the experimental implementation of PRO. However, PRO might raise care expectations for people with HIV that may be difficult to meet within the current healthcare framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2570406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in HIV care may contribute to a more holistic approach. There is no gold standard of PRO measures that best reflect the concerns and needs of people with HIV, because these may vary depending on healthcare contexts. The aim of this study was to explore HIV healthcare providers' (HCPs') experiences regarding the concerns and needs of people with HIV, and their perspectives on the use of PROs in HIV care. This was a single-centre, Danish qualitative study. We included nine HCPs in two focus group discussions, which followed an interview guide. Data were thematically analyzed following Interpretive Description framework. We identified three main themes: 1: People with HIV have varying healthcare needs. 2: Beyond biomedical care - within the current clinical framework. 3: Ambivalence towards PROs. The healthcare needs of people with HIV vary and depend on their social circumstances. HCPs try to have a holistic approach, but they are limited by a lack of time and resources in the healthcare system. HCPs were generally positive about the experimental implementation of PRO. However, PRO might raise care expectations for people with HIV that may be difficult to meet within the current healthcare framework.

医疗保健提供者对丹麦艾滋病毒护理中患者报告结果(PRO)使用的看法-一项定性焦点小组研究。
在艾滋病毒护理中使用患者报告结果(PROs)可能有助于采用更全面的方法。没有最能反映艾滋病毒感染者关切和需求的PRO措施的黄金标准,因为这些措施可能因卫生保健环境而异。本研究的目的是探讨艾滋病毒医护人员(HCPs)对艾滋病毒感染者的关注和需求的经验,以及他们对在艾滋病毒护理中使用pro的看法。这是一项单中心的丹麦定性研究。我们在两次焦点小组讨论中纳入了9名hcp,讨论遵循了采访指南。根据解释性描述框架对数据进行主题分析。我们确定了三个主要主题:1 .艾滋病毒感染者有不同的保健需求。2:超越生物医学护理-在目前的临床框架内。3 .对优点的矛盾心理。艾滋病毒感染者的保健需求各不相同,取决于他们的社会环境。卫生保健专业人员试图采取一种全面的方法,但他们受到医疗保健系统缺乏时间和资源的限制。HCPs普遍对PRO的实验实施持积极态度。然而,PRO可能会提高对艾滋病毒感染者的护理期望,这在当前的医疗保健框架内可能难以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信