Finite Element Analysis of Titanium Plates for Unilateral Condylar Neck Fracture Fixation: A Computational Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s12663-025-02445-z
Agalyah Kalyan Kumar, Pradeep Christopher, Mohamed Afradh, Vandana Shenoy
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis of Titanium Plates for Unilateral Condylar Neck Fracture Fixation: A Computational Study.","authors":"Agalyah Kalyan Kumar, Pradeep Christopher, Mohamed Afradh, Vandana Shenoy","doi":"10.1007/s12663-025-02445-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Condylar neck fractures are challenging to treat owing to their intricate biomechanics, constrained accessibility, and narrow anatomical dimensions. This complexity hinders the precise placement of internal fixation devices and assurance of fracture stability. Despite various osteosynthesis devices, a lacuna persists regarding the effectiveness of these plates in stabilizing condylar neck fractures. This study compares the performance of five titanium osteosynthesis devices (single 4-hole Miniplate, Lambda, Trapezoidal, Rhomboidal, Alpha plates) in fixing unilateral condylar neck fractures using computational finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Mandibular model, derived from a CT scan, underwent virtual condylar neck fracture simulation. Osteosynthesis plate models were adapted to the fractured segments. Implementing FEA, each model was evaluated under two loading scenarios: (i) reduced post-operative bite force of 135 N and (ii) clenching masticatory force of 500 N. Analysed parameters encompassed stress on screws across different plates, displacements along the fracture line, bone strains on the screw portion, and stress on plates, implant deformation, and rigidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 135N, all 5 plates offer an adequate fixation with a small risk of screw loosening for the rhomboidal and trapezoidal plates. For 500N, the lambda and alpha plates showed superior performance by evenly distributing strains within the bone, maintaining rigidity and reducing implant failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lambda and Alpha plates demonstrated superior performance under increased loads. Conversely, Trapezoidal and Rhomboidal plates are not advisable for condylar neck fractures, particularly when anticipating larger functional loads.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"24 5","pages":"1245-1255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-025-02445-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Condylar neck fractures are challenging to treat owing to their intricate biomechanics, constrained accessibility, and narrow anatomical dimensions. This complexity hinders the precise placement of internal fixation devices and assurance of fracture stability. Despite various osteosynthesis devices, a lacuna persists regarding the effectiveness of these plates in stabilizing condylar neck fractures. This study compares the performance of five titanium osteosynthesis devices (single 4-hole Miniplate, Lambda, Trapezoidal, Rhomboidal, Alpha plates) in fixing unilateral condylar neck fractures using computational finite element analysis (FEA).

Method: Mandibular model, derived from a CT scan, underwent virtual condylar neck fracture simulation. Osteosynthesis plate models were adapted to the fractured segments. Implementing FEA, each model was evaluated under two loading scenarios: (i) reduced post-operative bite force of 135 N and (ii) clenching masticatory force of 500 N. Analysed parameters encompassed stress on screws across different plates, displacements along the fracture line, bone strains on the screw portion, and stress on plates, implant deformation, and rigidity.

Results: At 135N, all 5 plates offer an adequate fixation with a small risk of screw loosening for the rhomboidal and trapezoidal plates. For 500N, the lambda and alpha plates showed superior performance by evenly distributing strains within the bone, maintaining rigidity and reducing implant failure.

Conclusion: Lambda and Alpha plates demonstrated superior performance under increased loads. Conversely, Trapezoidal and Rhomboidal plates are not advisable for condylar neck fractures, particularly when anticipating larger functional loads.

钛板固定单侧髁颈骨折的有限元分析:计算研究。
前言:髁突颈骨折由于其复杂的生物力学、受限的可及性和狭窄的解剖尺寸,治疗具有挑战性。这种复杂性阻碍了内固定装置的精确放置和骨折稳定性的保证。尽管有各种各样的植骨装置,但这些钢板在稳定髁突颈骨折方面的有效性仍然存在空白。本研究采用计算有限元分析(FEA)比较了5种钛骨固定装置(单4孔Miniplate, Lambda,梯形,菱形,Alpha板)固定单侧髁颈骨折的性能。方法:通过CT扫描建立下颌骨模型,进行虚拟髁突颈骨折模拟。骨接骨板模型适用于骨折节段。通过有限元分析,每个模型在两种加载情况下进行评估:(i)术后咬合力降低135 N, (ii)咬合咀嚼力为500 N。分析参数包括不同钢板上螺钉的应力、骨折线上的位移、螺钉部分的骨应变、钢板上的应力、种植体变形和刚度。结果:在135N时,所有5个钢板都提供了足够的固定,菱形和梯形钢板螺钉松动的风险很小。对于500N, λ和α板表现出优异的性能,它们在骨内均匀分布应变,保持刚性并减少种植体失效。结论:Lambda和Alpha钢板在增加载荷下表现出优越的性能。相反,梯形和菱形钢板不建议用于髁突颈骨折,特别是当预期较大的功能负荷时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信