{"title":"Trends and associations of remote workdays and short sickness absences among Finnish knowledge workers from 2019 to 2023.","authors":"Annina Ropponen, Annu Haapakangas","doi":"10.1177/14034948251380639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to investigate short (1-3 days) sickness absence (SA) and remote work in 2019-2023 among a cohort of Finnish knowledge workers. A specific aim was to investigate the role of working hours and the associations between remote work and SA and if the associations would differ before, during, or after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employer-owned register data of 5535 knowledge workers for working hours (daily and weekly working hours), remote workdays/week, and short, 1-3 days, SA from 2019 to 2023 were investigated with a fixed-effects Poisson regression analysis for incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall associations between remote work and short SA indicated that each 1-day increase in remote workdays was associated with higher odds of short SA (IRR 1.27, 95%CI 1.24, 1.30). The comparison across the years 2019-2023 showed varying associations. In the pre-pandemic year, 2019, there was no statistically significant association between remote workdays and short SA. Since 2021, doing no remote work has been associated with a lower likelihood of short SA. Instead, working remotely for 1-2 days or 3-5 days/week was associated with higher likelihood only when compared with no remote work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Among knowledge workers, remote work seems related to short, 1-3 days of SA only after the COVID-19 pandemic. The possibility of working remotely might be an important factor in mitigating infections, while our results raise the assumption that presenteeism might be prevalent in remote work.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251380639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251380639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: The aim was to investigate short (1-3 days) sickness absence (SA) and remote work in 2019-2023 among a cohort of Finnish knowledge workers. A specific aim was to investigate the role of working hours and the associations between remote work and SA and if the associations would differ before, during, or after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Employer-owned register data of 5535 knowledge workers for working hours (daily and weekly working hours), remote workdays/week, and short, 1-3 days, SA from 2019 to 2023 were investigated with a fixed-effects Poisson regression analysis for incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
Results: The overall associations between remote work and short SA indicated that each 1-day increase in remote workdays was associated with higher odds of short SA (IRR 1.27, 95%CI 1.24, 1.30). The comparison across the years 2019-2023 showed varying associations. In the pre-pandemic year, 2019, there was no statistically significant association between remote workdays and short SA. Since 2021, doing no remote work has been associated with a lower likelihood of short SA. Instead, working remotely for 1-2 days or 3-5 days/week was associated with higher likelihood only when compared with no remote work.
Conclusions: Among knowledge workers, remote work seems related to short, 1-3 days of SA only after the COVID-19 pandemic. The possibility of working remotely might be an important factor in mitigating infections, while our results raise the assumption that presenteeism might be prevalent in remote work.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.