Does the Method of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Differentially Affect Postoperative Strength of Jaw Muscles as Assessed by Surface Electromyography? An Analytical Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5
Mehul Shashikant Hirani, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Bhupendra Singh Yadav, Neeraj Kumar Dhiman, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Richik Tripathi
{"title":"Does the Method of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Differentially Affect Postoperative Strength of Jaw Muscles as Assessed by Surface Electromyography? An Analytical Study.","authors":"Mehul Shashikant Hirani, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Bhupendra Singh Yadav, Neeraj Kumar Dhiman, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Richik Tripathi","doi":"10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze differential postoperative strength of masticatory muscles by surface electromyography (sEMG) in mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) using two open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Present study evaluated the two ORIF approaches in unilateral non-comminuted central MAFs operated by intraoral ORIF (group A, <i>n</i> = 17) and extraoral ORIF (group B, <i>n</i> = 8). Root mean square (RMS) values of sEMG (<i>μ</i>V.s) of bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles for 10 s each, i.e., rest, maximum clenching, maximum mouth opening (MMO), ipsilateral and contralateral excursion, were compared from preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Further, MMO, ipsilateral and contralateral excursions were measured using caliper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05) in sEMG of all four muscles during all five conditions between the groups was observed from pre-op to post-op 6 months. Post-op group A showed significantly higher MMO and statistically significant difference in sEMG of ipsilateral masseter (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and temporalis muscles (<i>p</i> = 0.019) compared to contralateral muscles at 1 month. When comparing percentage sEMG change from pre-op to 6 months, muscles of both groups revealed positive changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoral ORIF technique for MAFs shows early improvements in MMO and subsequent changes in sEMG of the masticatory muscles due to minimal muscle stripping, thus favoring its use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"24 5","pages":"1271-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze differential postoperative strength of masticatory muscles by surface electromyography (sEMG) in mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) using two open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) approaches.

Materials and methods: Present study evaluated the two ORIF approaches in unilateral non-comminuted central MAFs operated by intraoral ORIF (group A, n = 17) and extraoral ORIF (group B, n = 8). Root mean square (RMS) values of sEMG (μV.s) of bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles for 10 s each, i.e., rest, maximum clenching, maximum mouth opening (MMO), ipsilateral and contralateral excursion, were compared from preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Further, MMO, ipsilateral and contralateral excursions were measured using caliper.

Results: No significant difference (p > 0.05) in sEMG of all four muscles during all five conditions between the groups was observed from pre-op to post-op 6 months. Post-op group A showed significantly higher MMO and statistically significant difference in sEMG of ipsilateral masseter (p = 0.017) and temporalis muscles (p = 0.019) compared to contralateral muscles at 1 month. When comparing percentage sEMG change from pre-op to 6 months, muscles of both groups revealed positive changes.

Conclusion: The intraoral ORIF technique for MAFs shows early improvements in MMO and subsequent changes in sEMG of the masticatory muscles due to minimal muscle stripping, thus favoring its use in clinical practice.

下颌角骨折切开复位和内固定方法对术后颌骨肌肉强度的影响是否有差异?分析性研究。
目的:分析两种切开复位内固定(ORIF)入路下颌骨角骨折(maf)术后咀嚼肌强度的差异。材料和方法:本研究评估了口腔内ORIF (A组,n = 17)和口腔外ORIF (B组,n = 8)治疗单侧非粉碎性中央maf的两种ORIF入路。比较术前、术后1、3、6个月各10 s的双侧咬肌和颞肌肌肌电信号(μV.s)的均方根(RMS)值,即休息、最大握紧、最大张嘴(MMO)、同侧和对侧偏移。此外,用卡尺测量MMO、同侧和对侧偏移。结果:术前至术后6个月,5种情况下各组间4块肌肉肌电图均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。术后1个月A组同侧咬肌(p = 0.017)、颞肌(p = 0.019)的肌电图与对侧肌电图比较差异有统计学意义。对比术前至术后6个月的肌电变化百分比,两组肌肉均呈现积极变化。结论:口腔内ORIF技术治疗maffs可早期改善咀嚼肌的MMO和随后的咀嚼肌表面肌电变化,因为肌肉剥离较少,因此有利于临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信