"Join us in preparing people for tomorrow's jobs": Robert Reich, the "New Economy," and mythic thinking as interventionist knowledge.

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Lee Jared Vinsel
{"title":"\"Join us in preparing people for tomorrow's jobs\": Robert Reich, the \"New Economy,\" and mythic thinking as interventionist knowledge.","authors":"Lee Jared Vinsel","doi":"10.1017/S0269889725100859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the intellectual and interventionist trajectory of American popular writer and commentator Robert Reich from his early 1980s advocacy of \"industrial policy\" to his time as US Secretary of Labor in the 1990s. It argues that Reich is an interesting figure to consider through the lens of \"interventionist knowledges\" because, although he draws selectively on social scientific data and knowledge, his syntheses of these things are more rooted in mythic thinking than in disciplined analysis. This article recounts the history of a failed bill, the Reemployment Act of 1994, to examine how Reich and those around him drew on and interpreted existing social scientific data to construct an idea of \"the New Economy\" and what, they claimed, it meant for national human capital policy. This article suggests that mythic visions of society and economy possibly play a large role in policy-making and issues advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49562,"journal":{"name":"Science in Context","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Context","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889725100859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the intellectual and interventionist trajectory of American popular writer and commentator Robert Reich from his early 1980s advocacy of "industrial policy" to his time as US Secretary of Labor in the 1990s. It argues that Reich is an interesting figure to consider through the lens of "interventionist knowledges" because, although he draws selectively on social scientific data and knowledge, his syntheses of these things are more rooted in mythic thinking than in disciplined analysis. This article recounts the history of a failed bill, the Reemployment Act of 1994, to examine how Reich and those around him drew on and interpreted existing social scientific data to construct an idea of "the New Economy" and what, they claimed, it meant for national human capital policy. This article suggests that mythic visions of society and economy possibly play a large role in policy-making and issues advocacy.

“加入我们,让人们为明天的工作做好准备”:罗伯特·赖希,“新经济”,以及作为干预主义知识的神话思维。
本文考察了美国通俗作家和评论家罗伯特·赖希从20世纪80年代初倡导“产业政策”到20世纪90年代担任美国劳工部长期间的智力和干预主义轨迹。该书认为,从“干预主义知识”的角度来看,赖希是一个有趣的人物,因为尽管他有选择地借鉴了社会科学数据和知识,但他对这些东西的综合更多地植根于神话思维,而不是严谨的分析。本文回顾了1994年《再就业法案》(Reemployment Act of 1994)这一失败法案的历史,考察了赖希和他周围的人是如何利用和解释现有的社会科学数据来构建“新经济”概念的,以及他们声称这对国家人力资本政策意味着什么。本文认为,社会和经济的神话愿景可能在政策制定和问题倡导中发挥了很大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science in Context
Science in Context 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science in Context is an international journal edited at The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, with the support of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. It is devoted to the study of the sciences from the points of view of comparative epistemology and historical sociology of scientific knowledge. The journal is committed to an interdisciplinary approach to the study of science and its cultural development - it does not segregate considerations drawn from history, philosophy and sociology. Controversies within scientific knowledge and debates about methodology are presented in their contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书