The Preanalytical Process Matters: Impact of Blood Collection Tubes on the Measurement of Vitamin D Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sae Ochi, Akihiro Kunisawa, Tomokazu Matsuura, Hiroyasu Miyamoto, Yuichi Ikeda, Masaki Miyasaka, Ayasa Tajima, Reiko Kisugi, Daisuke Kawakami, Tsuyoshi Nakanishi, Nobuhiro Hanafusa, Yutaka Furutani
{"title":"The Preanalytical Process Matters: Impact of Blood Collection Tubes on the Measurement of Vitamin D Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.","authors":"Sae Ochi, Akihiro Kunisawa, Tomokazu Matsuura, Hiroyasu Miyamoto, Yuichi Ikeda, Masaki Miyasaka, Ayasa Tajima, Reiko Kisugi, Daisuke Kawakami, Tsuyoshi Nakanishi, Nobuhiro Hanafusa, Yutaka Furutani","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a highly sensitive analytical tool that has become the gold standard for measuring the concentrations of some steroidal hormones and therapeutic drugs in blood. However, the application of this technology in different clinical laboratories faces challenges related to the preanalytical process. In this study, we investigated how the materials used in blood collection tubes affect the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] by LC-MS/MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples were collected in 20 different blood collection tubes made by various manufacturers. The samples were processed under controlled conditions to simulate clinical practice, followed by measurement using an LC-MS/MS system. The data were compared with measurements obtained from a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant variability in measurement outcomes was observed depending on the type of blood collection tube used. Specific blood collection tubes from a manufacturer that employed specific separator gels exhibited interference, as indicated by broad peaks in chromatograms. This interference complicated the quantification of 25(OH)D. The interference was consistent across multiple samples, indicating a systemic problem related to the materials used in the blood collection tubes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need to evaluate blood collection tubes from various manufacturers prior to the clinical implementation of LC-MS/MS measurements. Because LC-MS/MS has unique potential error sources, our results indicate the importance in utilizing LC-MS/MS international standards to ensure accurate and reliable results in clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a highly sensitive analytical tool that has become the gold standard for measuring the concentrations of some steroidal hormones and therapeutic drugs in blood. However, the application of this technology in different clinical laboratories faces challenges related to the preanalytical process. In this study, we investigated how the materials used in blood collection tubes affect the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] by LC-MS/MS.

Methods: Serum samples were collected in 20 different blood collection tubes made by various manufacturers. The samples were processed under controlled conditions to simulate clinical practice, followed by measurement using an LC-MS/MS system. The data were compared with measurements obtained from a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay.

Results: Significant variability in measurement outcomes was observed depending on the type of blood collection tube used. Specific blood collection tubes from a manufacturer that employed specific separator gels exhibited interference, as indicated by broad peaks in chromatograms. This interference complicated the quantification of 25(OH)D. The interference was consistent across multiple samples, indicating a systemic problem related to the materials used in the blood collection tubes.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the need to evaluate blood collection tubes from various manufacturers prior to the clinical implementation of LC-MS/MS measurements. Because LC-MS/MS has unique potential error sources, our results indicate the importance in utilizing LC-MS/MS international standards to ensure accurate and reliable results in clinical laboratories.

前分析过程事项:血液采集管对使用液相色谱串联质谱法测量维生素D的影响。
背景:液相色谱串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)是一种高灵敏度的分析工具,已成为测量血液中某些甾体激素和治疗药物浓度的金标准。然而,这项技术在不同临床实验室的应用面临着与分析前过程相关的挑战。在本研究中,我们研究了采血管所用材料对LC-MS/MS测定血清25-羟基维生素D [25(OH)D]的影响。方法:在20根不同厂家的不同采血管中采集血清。样品在受控条件下进行处理,以模拟临床实践,然后使用LC-MS/MS系统进行测量。这些数据与化学发光酶免疫分析法获得的测量结果进行了比较。结果:根据所使用的采血管的类型,观察到测量结果的显著差异。采用特殊分离凝胶的制造商生产的特定采血管表现出干扰,如色谱图上的宽峰所示。这种干扰使25(OH)D的定量复杂化。这种干扰在多个样本中都是一致的,这表明血液采集管中使用的材料存在系统性问题。结论:这些发现强调了在临床实施LC-MS/MS测量之前,需要对不同制造商的采血管进行评估。由于LC-MS/MS具有独特的潜在误差来源,因此我们的研究结果表明,在临床实验室中使用LC-MS/MS国际标准以确保准确可靠的结果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信