Effects of community peer-led programmes for people with spinal cord injury in Sweden-the INTERnational project for the evaluation of active rehabilitation (INTER-PEER).

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anestis Divanoglou, Erik Berndtsson, Tomasz Tasiemski, Carolina Saskia Fellinghauer, Sophie Jörgensen
{"title":"Effects of community peer-led programmes for people with spinal cord injury in Sweden-the INTERnational project for the evaluation of active rehabilitation (INTER-PEER).","authors":"Anestis Divanoglou, Erik Berndtsson, Tomasz Tasiemski, Carolina Saskia Fellinghauer, Sophie Jörgensen","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01119-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Longitudinal prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of Active Rehabilitation (AR) training programmes for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) on physical independence, self-efficacy and wheelchair skills, and to identify factors that are associated with gains in these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight consecutive AR programmes in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 111) with traumatic or nontraumatic SCI, aged 16 years and older, were evaluated at the start (T1) and completion (T2) of the programme, and at 3-month follow-up (T3). Assessments included standardised self-reported outcome measures (T1-T2-T3) and a practical wheelchair skills test (T1-T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After attending the short, intensive peer-led AR programmes, participants reported gains in physical independence, especially in dressing and washing, bowel management, bed mobility, and transfers. Wheelchair skills improved, while improvements in aspects of self-efficacy and resilience were observed only at programme completion. Gains in physical independence and self-reported wheelchair skills were present at the 3-month follow-up. With few exceptions, examined predictors did not explain the observed outcome gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AR programmes offer an effective, low-cost opportunity to improve essential and challenging aspects of physical independence and wheelchair skills among community-dwelling individuals with SCI. Immediate gains in aspects of self-efficacy and resilience-though not sustained at follow-up-may provide an initial momentum for future behavioural change, particularly among individuals who struggle to adjust to life after SCI. These findings strongly support the inclusion of intensive, residential, community-based peer-led programmes as a key component of the rehabilitation continuum for people with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01119-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Longitudinal prospective cohort study.

Objectives: To assess the effects of Active Rehabilitation (AR) training programmes for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) on physical independence, self-efficacy and wheelchair skills, and to identify factors that are associated with gains in these outcomes.

Setting: Eight consecutive AR programmes in Sweden.

Methods: Participants (n = 111) with traumatic or nontraumatic SCI, aged 16 years and older, were evaluated at the start (T1) and completion (T2) of the programme, and at 3-month follow-up (T3). Assessments included standardised self-reported outcome measures (T1-T2-T3) and a practical wheelchair skills test (T1-T2).

Results: After attending the short, intensive peer-led AR programmes, participants reported gains in physical independence, especially in dressing and washing, bowel management, bed mobility, and transfers. Wheelchair skills improved, while improvements in aspects of self-efficacy and resilience were observed only at programme completion. Gains in physical independence and self-reported wheelchair skills were present at the 3-month follow-up. With few exceptions, examined predictors did not explain the observed outcome gains.

Conclusion: AR programmes offer an effective, low-cost opportunity to improve essential and challenging aspects of physical independence and wheelchair skills among community-dwelling individuals with SCI. Immediate gains in aspects of self-efficacy and resilience-though not sustained at follow-up-may provide an initial momentum for future behavioural change, particularly among individuals who struggle to adjust to life after SCI. These findings strongly support the inclusion of intensive, residential, community-based peer-led programmes as a key component of the rehabilitation continuum for people with SCI.

瑞典脊髓损伤患者社区同伴主导方案的效果——积极康复评估国际项目(INTER-PEER)。
研究设计:纵向前瞻性队列研究。目的:评估脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的主动康复(AR)训练计划对身体独立性、自我效能和轮椅技能的影响,并确定与这些结果相关的因素。背景:瑞典连续8个AR项目。方法:年龄在16岁及以上的创伤性或非创伤性脊髓损伤参与者(n = 111)在项目开始(T1)和完成(T2)以及3个月随访(T3)时进行评估。评估包括标准化的自我报告结果测量(T1-T2- t3)和实用轮椅技能测试(T1-T2)。结果:在参加了短期的、密集的由同伴主导的AR项目后,参与者报告了身体独立性的提高,特别是在穿衣和洗涤、排便、床的移动和转移方面。轮椅技能有所提高,而自我效能感和恢复力方面的改善仅在项目完成后才被观察到。在3个月的随访中,身体独立性和自我报告的轮椅技能都有所提高。除了少数例外,检验的预测因子不能解释观察到的结果增益。结论:AR项目提供了一个有效的、低成本的机会来改善社区居住的SCI患者身体独立性和轮椅技能的基本和具有挑战性的方面。在自我效能和恢复力方面的直接收获——尽管在后续随访中无法持续——可能会为未来的行为改变提供最初的动力,特别是在那些努力适应脊髓损伤后生活的个体中。这些发现有力地支持将密集的、住院的、以社区为基础的同伴主导的项目作为脊髓损伤患者康复连续体的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信