[IMPLEMENTATION OF COGNITIVE EXPERT SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE: ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS].

Q4 Medicine
I G Rzun, N A Garazha, N V Selyunina, T V Lokhova, N S Kasimova
{"title":"[IMPLEMENTATION OF COGNITIVE EXPERT SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE: ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS].","authors":"I G Rzun, N A Garazha, N V Selyunina, T V Lokhova, N S Kasimova","doi":"10.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s1-894-901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article substantiates the relevance of ethical understanding and regulatory restrictions on the process of implementing a system of cognitive expert systems in healthcare. The key provisions of the axiological approach to digital healthcare strategies are defined, which should take into account national and regional conditions with mandatory dynamic interaction of all stakeholders, guaranteeing, among other things, international pluralism and basic community. Based on the analysis of a number of systems, it was revealed that the main thing in the process of developing and using expert systems is the correctness, reliability of medical information and professional assessment of the results of the systems activities. Which not only does not contradict, but also accepts the solution to the problem with the mandatory systematic inclusion of basic ethical standards in the process of developing technical solutions based on artificial intelligence and active parallel legislative initiative.</p>","PeriodicalId":35946,"journal":{"name":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","volume":"33 0","pages":"894-901"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s1-894-901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article substantiates the relevance of ethical understanding and regulatory restrictions on the process of implementing a system of cognitive expert systems in healthcare. The key provisions of the axiological approach to digital healthcare strategies are defined, which should take into account national and regional conditions with mandatory dynamic interaction of all stakeholders, guaranteeing, among other things, international pluralism and basic community. Based on the analysis of a number of systems, it was revealed that the main thing in the process of developing and using expert systems is the correctness, reliability of medical information and professional assessment of the results of the systems activities. Which not only does not contradict, but also accepts the solution to the problem with the mandatory systematic inclusion of basic ethical standards in the process of developing technical solutions based on artificial intelligence and active parallel legislative initiative.

[认知专家系统在医疗保健中的实施:伦理和法律方面]。
这篇文章证实了在医疗保健中实施认知专家系统系统的过程中伦理理解和监管限制的相关性。确定了数字医疗保健战略价值论方法的关键条款,这些条款应考虑到国家和区域条件,所有利益攸关方必须进行动态互动,除其他外,保证国际多元化和基本社区。通过对多个专家系统的分析,揭示了专家系统开发和使用过程中的主要问题是医学信息的正确性、可靠性以及对系统活动结果的专业评估。这不仅不矛盾,而且接受了在基于人工智能的技术解决方案开发过程中强制性地系统地纳入基本伦理标准和积极的平行立法主动性来解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信