Living with pain-a systematic review on patients' subjective experiences.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maria Christidis, Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi, Tasnim Miah, Laura Mihasi, Artin Razavian, Nikolaos Christidis, Giancarlo De la Torre Canales
{"title":"Living with pain-a systematic review on patients' subjective experiences.","authors":"Maria Christidis, Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi, Tasnim Miah, Laura Mihasi, Artin Razavian, Nikolaos Christidis, Giancarlo De la Torre Canales","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02953-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the subjective experiences of patients living with chronic, acute, and cancer pain can significantly enhance the selection of treatment approaches, care, and support, ultimately improving their quality of life. This qualitative systematic review aimed to analyze if the patients' subjective experiences of living with pain differ between acute, chronic, and cancer pain states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After registration in PROSPERO (CRD42023491745), an electronic search was conducted in the databases Medline (Ovid), Embase (embase.com), Cochrane (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), and CINAHL (EBSCO) from their inception to 19 April 2024. Out of 8443 articles, 62 articles were included. The inclusion criteria that were applied were as follows: (1) participants aged 18 or older; and (2) participants' subjective experiences of chronic, acute, or cancer pain. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) studies presented in other languages than English, Spanish, Portuguese, Greek, and Scandinavian languages; (b) editorials, letters, legal cases, case series, and case-control studies; (c) studies and articles based on duplicated data; (d) study population with ages below 18 years. Forty-four articles regarding chronic pain, thirteen regarding cancer pain, and five regarding acute pain were included. Methodological limitations were assessed using the CASP tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE-CERQual. All included studies showed moderate (n = 18) to high (n = 44) confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the qualitative synthesis in GRADE-CERQual, four main themes were identified: (1) impact of pain on social life, work life, and family life; (2) challenges in healthcare access; (3) psychological impact and emotional struggles from pain; and (4) barriers to effective pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together, patients with chronic, acute, or cancer pain face challenges in social, work, and personal lives. They often lack recognition and support from healthcare providers, relying on self-managed methods and facing barriers to effective management. Therefore, future research examining how the different pain types affect the lives of the patients and at the same time exploring personalized and collaborative treatment approaches is warranted. In conclusion, patients' experiences of living with pain remain unexplored in clinical practice. Understanding the impact of various pain types on mental health, self-esteem, daily life, and relationships is crucial. Also, how personalized treatments, collaborative healthcare access, and long-term management strategies can improve quality of life for patients living with pain.</p><p><strong>Systemic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023491745.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02953-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the subjective experiences of patients living with chronic, acute, and cancer pain can significantly enhance the selection of treatment approaches, care, and support, ultimately improving their quality of life. This qualitative systematic review aimed to analyze if the patients' subjective experiences of living with pain differ between acute, chronic, and cancer pain states.

Methods: After registration in PROSPERO (CRD42023491745), an electronic search was conducted in the databases Medline (Ovid), Embase (embase.com), Cochrane (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), and CINAHL (EBSCO) from their inception to 19 April 2024. Out of 8443 articles, 62 articles were included. The inclusion criteria that were applied were as follows: (1) participants aged 18 or older; and (2) participants' subjective experiences of chronic, acute, or cancer pain. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) studies presented in other languages than English, Spanish, Portuguese, Greek, and Scandinavian languages; (b) editorials, letters, legal cases, case series, and case-control studies; (c) studies and articles based on duplicated data; (d) study population with ages below 18 years. Forty-four articles regarding chronic pain, thirteen regarding cancer pain, and five regarding acute pain were included. Methodological limitations were assessed using the CASP tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE-CERQual. All included studies showed moderate (n = 18) to high (n = 44) confidence.

Results: Based on the qualitative synthesis in GRADE-CERQual, four main themes were identified: (1) impact of pain on social life, work life, and family life; (2) challenges in healthcare access; (3) psychological impact and emotional struggles from pain; and (4) barriers to effective pain management.

Conclusions: Taken together, patients with chronic, acute, or cancer pain face challenges in social, work, and personal lives. They often lack recognition and support from healthcare providers, relying on self-managed methods and facing barriers to effective management. Therefore, future research examining how the different pain types affect the lives of the patients and at the same time exploring personalized and collaborative treatment approaches is warranted. In conclusion, patients' experiences of living with pain remain unexplored in clinical practice. Understanding the impact of various pain types on mental health, self-esteem, daily life, and relationships is crucial. Also, how personalized treatments, collaborative healthcare access, and long-term management strategies can improve quality of life for patients living with pain.

Systemic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023491745.

Abstract Image

与痛苦共存——对病人主观体验的系统回顾。
背景:了解慢性、急性和癌性疼痛患者的主观体验可以显著提高治疗方法、护理和支持的选择,最终改善他们的生活质量。本定性系统综述旨在分析急性、慢性和癌性疼痛状态下患者对疼痛生活的主观体验是否存在差异。方法:在PROSPERO (CRD42023491745)注册后,对Medline (Ovid)、Embase (embase.com)、Cochrane (Wiley)、Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)和CINAHL (EBSCO)等数据库从成立至2024年4月19日进行电子检索。在8443篇文章中,有62篇文章被纳入。采用的纳入标准如下:(1)受试者年龄在18岁及以上;(2)受试者对慢性、急性或癌性疼痛的主观体验。排除标准如下:(a)以英语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、希腊语和斯堪的纳维亚语以外的其他语言提出的研究;(b)社论、信函、法律案例、案例系列和病例对照研究;(c)基于重复数据的研究和文章;(d)研究年龄在18岁以下的人口。包括44篇关于慢性疼痛的文章,13篇关于癌症疼痛的文章,5篇关于急性疼痛的文章。使用CASP工具在定性证据合成中进行质量评价,评估方法学局限性。采用GRADE-CERQual评估证据的确定性。所有纳入的研究均显示中等(n = 18)至高(n = 44)的置信度。结果:基于GRADE-CERQual的定性综合,确定了四个主要主题:(1)疼痛对社会生活、工作生活和家庭生活的影响;(2)医疗服务可及性方面的挑战;(3)痛苦带来的心理冲击和情绪挣扎;(4)有效疼痛管理的障碍。综上所述,慢性、急性或癌性疼痛患者在社交、工作和个人生活中面临挑战。他们往往缺乏医疗保健提供者的认可和支持,依靠自我管理的方法,面临有效管理的障碍。因此,未来研究不同类型的疼痛如何影响患者的生活,同时探索个性化和协作治疗方法是必要的。总之,患者的疼痛生活经验在临床实践中仍未得到探索。了解不同类型的疼痛对心理健康、自尊、日常生活和人际关系的影响至关重要。此外,个性化治疗、协作医疗保健访问和长期管理策略如何改善疼痛患者的生活质量。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42023491745。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信