Effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and gait training in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shutao Qiu, Yixin Wei, Chaoran Gao, Xiangxiang Zhang, Qiang Gao
{"title":"Effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and gait training in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Shutao Qiu, Yixin Wei, Chaoran Gao, Xiangxiang Zhang, Qiang Gao","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02924-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training have been demonstrated as effective treatments for patients with PD. However, the effects of combined tDCS and gait training on PD remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of combined tDCS and gait training in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted literature searches in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed, and the Chinese Medical Association Journal Database to identify the effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and gait training in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 183 PD patients were analyzed. Statistically significant improvements were observed only in double support time, both immediately after intervention (MD = 0.04, 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, P = 0.0003) and at follow-up (MD = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in gait velocity, stride length, cadence, Time Up and Go test, Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, Berg Balance Scale, Six-Minute Walking Test, or Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III between the combined tDCS and gait training group and the gait training alone group (P > 0.05 for all outcomes). Heterogeneity across studies was low to moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 0-85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>tDCS combined with gait training compared with gait training alone did not make a statistically significant improvement in efficacy in patients with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02924-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training have been demonstrated as effective treatments for patients with PD. However, the effects of combined tDCS and gait training on PD remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of combined tDCS and gait training in PD patients.

Methods: We conducted literature searches in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed, and the Chinese Medical Association Journal Database to identify the effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and gait training in PD patients.

Results: Eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 183 PD patients were analyzed. Statistically significant improvements were observed only in double support time, both immediately after intervention (MD = 0.04, 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0003) and at follow-up (MD = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.03, I2 = 0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in gait velocity, stride length, cadence, Time Up and Go test, Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, Berg Balance Scale, Six-Minute Walking Test, or Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III between the combined tDCS and gait training group and the gait training alone group (P > 0.05 for all outcomes). Heterogeneity across studies was low to moderate (I2 = 0-85%).

Conclusions: tDCS combined with gait training compared with gait training alone did not make a statistically significant improvement in efficacy in patients with PD.

联合经颅直流电刺激和步态训练对帕金森病的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:帕金森病(PD)是全球第二常见的神经退行性疾病。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和步态训练已被证明是治疗PD患者的有效方法。然而,联合tDCS和步态训练对PD的影响尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估联合tDCS和步态训练对PD患者的影响。方法:检索EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国国家知识基础数据库、VIP、万方、中国医学信息网、中华医学会期刊数据库等文献,确定经颅直流电刺激联合步态训练对PD患者的影响。结果:我们分析了8项随机对照试验,共183例PD患者。只有在双支持时间内,即干预后立即(MD = 0.04, 95% CI, 0.02 ~ 0.06, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0003)和随访时(MD = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00 ~ 0.03, I2 = 0%, P = 0.02),观察到统计学上显著的改善。tDCS联合步态训练组与单独步态训练组在步态速度、步幅、节奏、Time Up and Go测试、步态冻结问卷、帕金森病问卷-39、Berg平衡量表、6分钟步行测试、统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分等指标上均无显著差异(各指标P < 0.05)。各研究的异质性为低至中等(I2 = 0-85%)。结论:与单独进行步态训练相比,tDCS联合步态训练对PD患者的疗效没有统计学意义的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信