Evaluating the relative importance of phylogeny and predictors in phylogenetic generalized linear models using the phylolm.hp R package.

IF 6.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Diversity Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2025.06.003
Jiangshan Lai, Yan He, Mi Hou, Aiying Zhang, Gang Wang, Lingfeng Mao
{"title":"Evaluating the relative importance of phylogeny and predictors in phylogenetic generalized linear models using the <i>phylolm.hp</i> R package.","authors":"Jiangshan Lai, Yan He, Mi Hou, Aiying Zhang, Gang Wang, Lingfeng Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative analyses in ecology and evolution often face the challenge of controlling for the effects of shared ancestry (phylogeny) from those of ecological or trait-based predictors on species traits. Phylogenetic Generalized Linear Models (PGLMs) address this issue by integrating phylogenetic relationships into statistical models. However, accurately partitioning explained variance among correlated predictors remains challenging. The <i>phylolm.hp</i> R package tackles this problem by extending the concept of \"average shared variance\" to PGLMs, enabling nuanced quantification of the relative importance of phylogeny and other predictors. The package calculates individual likelihood-based R<sup>2</sup> contributions of phylogeny and each predictor, accounting for both unique and shared explained variance. This approach overcomes limitations of traditional partial R<sup>2</sup> methods, which often fail to sum the total R<sup>2</sup> due to multicollinearity. We demonstrate the functionality of <i>phylolm.hp</i> through two case studies: one involving continuous trait data (maximum tree height in Californian species) and another focusing on binary trait data (species invasiveness in North American forests). The <i>phylolm.hp</i> package offers researchers a powerful tool to disentangle the contributions of phylogenetic and ecological predictors in comparative analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"47 5","pages":"709-717"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2025.06.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative analyses in ecology and evolution often face the challenge of controlling for the effects of shared ancestry (phylogeny) from those of ecological or trait-based predictors on species traits. Phylogenetic Generalized Linear Models (PGLMs) address this issue by integrating phylogenetic relationships into statistical models. However, accurately partitioning explained variance among correlated predictors remains challenging. The phylolm.hp R package tackles this problem by extending the concept of "average shared variance" to PGLMs, enabling nuanced quantification of the relative importance of phylogeny and other predictors. The package calculates individual likelihood-based R2 contributions of phylogeny and each predictor, accounting for both unique and shared explained variance. This approach overcomes limitations of traditional partial R2 methods, which often fail to sum the total R2 due to multicollinearity. We demonstrate the functionality of phylolm.hp through two case studies: one involving continuous trait data (maximum tree height in Californian species) and another focusing on binary trait data (species invasiveness in North American forests). The phylolm.hp package offers researchers a powerful tool to disentangle the contributions of phylogenetic and ecological predictors in comparative analyses.

系统发育与预测因子在系统发育广义线性模型中的相对重要性。hp R包。
生态学和进化的比较分析经常面临着控制共同祖先(系统发育)的影响与生态或基于性状的预测因子对物种性状的影响的挑战。系统发育广义线性模型(PGLMs)通过将系统发育关系整合到统计模型中来解决这个问题。然而,在相关预测因子之间准确划分解释方差仍然具有挑战性。phylolm。hp R包通过将“平均共享方差”的概念扩展到pglm来解决这个问题,从而能够对系统发育和其他预测因素的相对重要性进行细致的量化。该软件包计算系统发育和每个预测因子的个体基于似然的R2贡献,考虑独特和共享的解释方差。该方法克服了传统的部分R2方法由于多重共线性而不能求出总R2的局限性。我们演示了phylolm的功能。hp通过两个案例研究:一个涉及连续性状数据(加利福尼亚物种的最大树高),另一个侧重于二元性状数据(北美森林的物种入侵)。phylolm。HP软件包为研究人员提供了一个强大的工具,可以在比较分析中解开系统发育和生态预测因子的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Diversity
Plant Diversity Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants, contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications, present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists. While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance. Fields covered by the journal include: plant systematics and taxonomy- evolutionary developmental biology- reproductive biology- phylo- and biogeography- evolutionary ecology- population biology- conservation biology- palaeobotany- molecular evolution- comparative and evolutionary genomics- physiology- biochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信