What does Dr Google tell us about tendinopathies? An Italian analysis of online content.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Francesco d'Amone, Ebonie Rio, Massimo Esposto, Charlotte Ganderton, Giacomo Rossettini, Matteo Cioeta
{"title":"What does Dr Google tell us about tendinopathies? An Italian analysis of online content.","authors":"Francesco d'Amone, Ebonie Rio, Massimo Esposto, Charlotte Ganderton, Giacomo Rossettini, Matteo Cioeta","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2571389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to identify the most frequently searched keywords and questions related to the Achilles, knee, shoulder, and elbow tendons in Italy. It further aimed to evaluate the credibility, readability, and content of the most visited web pages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semrush Inc. (2008) machine learning models were used for data mining in December 2024. Credibility and readability of the most visited web pages were assessed through the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and Gulpease index, respectively. A content analysis of web pages was used to determine alignment with evidence-based literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most searched question was \"How to treat foot tendonitis?\" (2,750 searches). Only two web pages (2.2%) were rated as providing unbiased information using the QUEST, with credibility values ranging from 4.0 (±1.6) to 11.4 (±4.0) across all searches. Gulpease indices ranged from 34.0 (±2.1) to 42.8 (±2.9) across all web pages. Notably, content analysis revealed only a small percentage of web pages that aligned to best available evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Credibility, readability, and overall quality of online content on tendons were poor. Healthcare professionals may play a role in promoting accurate terminology and supporting the production of high-quality, evidence-based web page content to improve public health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2571389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to identify the most frequently searched keywords and questions related to the Achilles, knee, shoulder, and elbow tendons in Italy. It further aimed to evaluate the credibility, readability, and content of the most visited web pages.

Methods: Semrush Inc. (2008) machine learning models were used for data mining in December 2024. Credibility and readability of the most visited web pages were assessed through the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and Gulpease index, respectively. A content analysis of web pages was used to determine alignment with evidence-based literature.

Results: The most searched question was "How to treat foot tendonitis?" (2,750 searches). Only two web pages (2.2%) were rated as providing unbiased information using the QUEST, with credibility values ranging from 4.0 (±1.6) to 11.4 (±4.0) across all searches. Gulpease indices ranged from 34.0 (±2.1) to 42.8 (±2.9) across all web pages. Notably, content analysis revealed only a small percentage of web pages that aligned to best available evidence.

Conclusion: Credibility, readability, and overall quality of online content on tendons were poor. Healthcare professionals may play a role in promoting accurate terminology and supporting the production of high-quality, evidence-based web page content to improve public health literacy.

关于肌腱病变b谷歌医生告诉了我们什么?意大利在线内容分析。
背景:本研究旨在确定意大利与跟腱、膝关节、肩关节和肘关节肌腱相关的搜索频率最高的关键词和问题。它进一步旨在评估最常访问的网页的可信度、可读性和内容。方法:Semrush Inc.(2008)的机器学习模型于2024年12月进行数据挖掘。通过质量评价评分工具(QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool, QUEST)和Gulpease指数分别对访问量最大的网页的可信度和可读性进行评估。网页内容分析用于确定与循证文献的一致性。结果:搜索最多的问题是“如何治疗足部肌腱炎?”(2750搜索)。使用QUEST,只有两个网页(2.2%)被评为提供无偏信息,所有搜索的可信度值从4.0(±1.6)到11.4(±4.0)不等。所有网页的Gulpease指数范围为34.0(±2.1)至42.8(±2.9)。值得注意的是,内容分析显示,只有一小部分网页符合现有的最佳证据。结论:跟腱网上内容的可信度、可读性和整体质量较差。医疗保健专业人员可以在促进准确的术语和支持制作高质量、以证据为基础的网页内容方面发挥作用,以提高公众卫生素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信