Patient and healthcare provider experience of diroximel fumarate: considerations for selecting disease-modifying therapy.

IF 3.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cortnee Roman, Meghan Garabedian, Virginia R Schobel, Beth Schneider, Elizabeth Luce, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Sai L Shankar
{"title":"Patient and healthcare provider experience of diroximel fumarate: considerations for selecting disease-modifying therapy.","authors":"Cortnee Roman, Meghan Garabedian, Virginia R Schobel, Beth Schneider, Elizabeth Luce, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Sai L Shankar","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2564589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate treatment perceptions of diroximel fumarate (DRF) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), with contextual data from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users, based on patient and healthcare provider (HCP) surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective web-based survey was conducted among MyMSTeam users aged ≥ 21 years in the United States, who provided information about their MS disease and treatment history. The Spherix HCP survey collected retrospective chart data from HCPs for patients who switched disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 535 MyMSTeam respondents, 77 (14%) received DMF and 46 (9%) received DRF. DRF users reported physical and emotional benefits such as slowed disease progression, decreased relapses, and new symptom prevention, with 70% noting at least one physical benefit and 46% reporting emotional/quality of life benefits. Additionally, 83% found DRF tolerable. HCPs reported prescribing DRF due to good tolerability (58%) and a preference for oral administration (50%). The most common reasons for switching to DRF were lack of efficacy (52%) or poor tolerability (49%) of previous DMTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A real-world, patient-focused survey on MS treatment suggested DRF was well tolerated and associated with patient-reported physical benefits. HCP-reported reasons for selecting DRF included efficacy and tolerability issues with prior DMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2564589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate treatment perceptions of diroximel fumarate (DRF) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), with contextual data from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users, based on patient and healthcare provider (HCP) surveys.

Methods: A prospective web-based survey was conducted among MyMSTeam users aged ≥ 21 years in the United States, who provided information about their MS disease and treatment history. The Spherix HCP survey collected retrospective chart data from HCPs for patients who switched disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

Results: Of 535 MyMSTeam respondents, 77 (14%) received DMF and 46 (9%) received DRF. DRF users reported physical and emotional benefits such as slowed disease progression, decreased relapses, and new symptom prevention, with 70% noting at least one physical benefit and 46% reporting emotional/quality of life benefits. Additionally, 83% found DRF tolerable. HCPs reported prescribing DRF due to good tolerability (58%) and a preference for oral administration (50%). The most common reasons for switching to DRF were lack of efficacy (52%) or poor tolerability (49%) of previous DMTs.

Conclusion: A real-world, patient-focused survey on MS treatment suggested DRF was well tolerated and associated with patient-reported physical benefits. HCP-reported reasons for selecting DRF included efficacy and tolerability issues with prior DMT.

富马酸地洛西梅尔的患者和医疗保健提供者的经验:选择疾病改善治疗的考虑。
目的:基于患者和医疗保健提供者(HCP)调查,利用富马酸二甲酯(DMF)使用者的背景数据,评估富马酸双洛西梅尔(DRF)治疗复发性多发性硬化症(MS)的疗效。方法:在美国年龄≥21岁的MyMSTeam用户中进行前瞻性网络调查,提供其MS疾病和治疗史的信息。Spherix HCP调查收集了切换疾病改善疗法(dmt)患者的HCP回顾性图表数据。结果:在535名MyMSTeam受访者中,77名(14%)接受DMF, 46名(9%)接受DRF。DRF使用者报告了身体和情绪方面的益处,如减缓疾病进展、减少复发和预防新症状,70%的人注意到至少一项身体益处,46%的人报告了情绪/生活质量方面的益处。此外,83%的人认为DRF是可以忍受的。HCPs报告说,由于良好的耐受性(58%)和口服给药的偏好(50%),他们开DRF。改用DRF的最常见原因是以前的dmt缺乏疗效(52%)或耐受性差(49%)。结论:一项真实世界,以患者为中心的MS治疗调查表明,DRF耐受性良好,并与患者报告的身体益处相关。hcp报告的选择DRF的原因包括既往DMT的疗效和耐受性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信