{"title":"Thrombectomy-capable vs. comprehensive stroke centers: impact on endovascular therapy outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion.","authors":"Shujuan Gan, Tingyu Yi, Jintao Chen, Wenli Zhang, Yanmin Wu, Meihua Wu, Weifeng Huang, Ya Shao, Lihua Xu, Dongsheng Ju, Liqun Jiao, Wenhuo Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08571-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although data on the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in different stroke centers are limited, this study aimed to evaluate EVT quality and outcomes in thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSCs) versus comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) for ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 37 stroke centers (11 CSCs, 26 TSCs) dispersed across 20 provinces. Patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 24 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. Regression models were used to control for baseline characteristics and time metrics to assess outcomes by center type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 947 patients (423 from TSCs, 524 from CSCs; median age: 69 years; 585 [61.8%] men) who underwent EVT were analyzed. Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score [mRS] 0-2 at 90 days) was 43.5% in TSCs and 49% in CSCs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.693-1.5). Compared to TSCs, CSCs exhibited lower mortality (aOR, 0.466; 95% CI, 0.284-0.767) and higher rates of successful reperfusion (aOR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.76-6.15). No significant differences were found in terms of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or procedural complications. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT, CSCs had similar functional independence rates to TSCs but lower mortality and better reperfusion without higher hemorrhage risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08571-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although data on the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in different stroke centers are limited, this study aimed to evaluate EVT quality and outcomes in thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSCs) versus comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) for ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion.
Materials and methods: This study included 37 stroke centers (11 CSCs, 26 TSCs) dispersed across 20 provinces. Patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 24 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. Regression models were used to control for baseline characteristics and time metrics to assess outcomes by center type.
Results: A total of 947 patients (423 from TSCs, 524 from CSCs; median age: 69 years; 585 [61.8%] men) who underwent EVT were analyzed. Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score [mRS] 0-2 at 90 days) was 43.5% in TSCs and 49% in CSCs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.693-1.5). Compared to TSCs, CSCs exhibited lower mortality (aOR, 0.466; 95% CI, 0.284-0.767) and higher rates of successful reperfusion (aOR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.76-6.15). No significant differences were found in terms of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or procedural complications. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses supported these findings.
Conclusions: In patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT, CSCs had similar functional independence rates to TSCs but lower mortality and better reperfusion without higher hemorrhage risk.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.