No effect of custom foot orthoses manufactured from EVA and/or TPU materials and sex on mechanical asymmetries during treadmill running in trained runners.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Ken Van Alsenoy, Derek Santos, Marietta Van der Linden, Joong Hyun Ryu, Lubna Al Raisi, Olivier Girard
{"title":"No effect of custom foot orthoses manufactured from EVA and/or TPU materials and sex on mechanical asymmetries during treadmill running in trained runners.","authors":"Ken Van Alsenoy, Derek Santos, Marietta Van der Linden, Joong Hyun Ryu, Lubna Al Raisi, Olivier Girard","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2569246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the influence of custom foot orthoses and sex on mechanical asymmetries during treadmill running. Eighteen trained, injury-free individuals (9 females) ran six minutes at 10% below their first ventilatory threshold (average speed: 9.9 ± 1.3 km/h) on an instrumented treadmill under four footwear conditions: original shoe liner (control), two custom orthotics [EVA and TPU], and a hybrid (EVA heel, TPU forefoot). Vertical and antero-posterior ground reaction forces were recorded after ~5 minutes, encompassing 40 steps. Mechanical asymmetry was assessed using the 'symmetry angle' (SA) score. No significant main effects were found for condition (all P ≥ 0.302), sex (P ≥ 0.137), or condition × sex interactions (P ≥ 0.063). Mean SA scores were <2% for contact time (0.39 ± 0.23%), flight time (1.90 ± 1.35%), step frequency (0.34 ± 0.26%), peak vertical force (1.44 ± 1.15%), and mean vertical loading rate (1.79 ± 1.17%). Vertical and leg stiffness had SA scores of 3.11 ± 1.73% and 1.86 ± 1.00%. For braking (1.56 ± 0.78%) and push-off (1.54 ± 0.81%) phases, and peak braking (2.94 ± 1.61%) and push-off (2.33 ± 1.17%) forces, SA scores ranged from ~1.5-3.0%. Both sexes exhibited even strides, with orthoses not affecting natural asymmetries. Orthoses of similar shape but different materials are unlikely to alter gait symmetry, suggesting unilateral assessments may suffice and reduce testing demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2569246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the influence of custom foot orthoses and sex on mechanical asymmetries during treadmill running. Eighteen trained, injury-free individuals (9 females) ran six minutes at 10% below their first ventilatory threshold (average speed: 9.9 ± 1.3 km/h) on an instrumented treadmill under four footwear conditions: original shoe liner (control), two custom orthotics [EVA and TPU], and a hybrid (EVA heel, TPU forefoot). Vertical and antero-posterior ground reaction forces were recorded after ~5 minutes, encompassing 40 steps. Mechanical asymmetry was assessed using the 'symmetry angle' (SA) score. No significant main effects were found for condition (all P ≥ 0.302), sex (P ≥ 0.137), or condition × sex interactions (P ≥ 0.063). Mean SA scores were <2% for contact time (0.39 ± 0.23%), flight time (1.90 ± 1.35%), step frequency (0.34 ± 0.26%), peak vertical force (1.44 ± 1.15%), and mean vertical loading rate (1.79 ± 1.17%). Vertical and leg stiffness had SA scores of 3.11 ± 1.73% and 1.86 ± 1.00%. For braking (1.56 ± 0.78%) and push-off (1.54 ± 0.81%) phases, and peak braking (2.94 ± 1.61%) and push-off (2.33 ± 1.17%) forces, SA scores ranged from ~1.5-3.0%. Both sexes exhibited even strides, with orthoses not affecting natural asymmetries. Orthoses of similar shape but different materials are unlikely to alter gait symmetry, suggesting unilateral assessments may suffice and reduce testing demands.

由EVA和/或TPU材料制造的定制足部矫形器和性别对训练有素的跑步者在跑步机上跑步时的机械不对称没有影响。
我们调查了定制足部矫形器和性别对跑步机时机械不对称的影响。18名受过训练的无损伤个体(9名女性)在仪器化的跑步机上以低于第一次呼吸阈值10%的速度(平均速度:9.9±1.3 km/h)跑步6分钟,穿四种鞋:原装鞋垫(对照),两种定制矫形器[EVA和TPU],以及混合(EVA鞋跟,TPU前足)。约5分钟后记录垂直和前后地面反作用力,共40步。采用“对称角”(SA)评分评估机械不对称性。条件(P均≥0.302)、性别(P≥0.137)或条件与性别相互作用(P≥0.063)均未发现显著的主效应。SA平均得分为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信