The effects of lengthened-partial range of motion resistance training of the limbs on arm and thigh muscle area: A multi-site randomised trial.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
David Gschneidner, Luke Carlson, James Steele, James P Fisher
{"title":"The effects of lengthened-partial range of motion resistance training of the limbs on arm and thigh muscle area: A multi-site randomised trial.","authors":"David Gschneidner, Luke Carlson, James Steele, James P Fisher","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2567805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project represents a highly powered pre-registered comparison of full ROM (fROM) and 'lengthened partial' ROM (lpROM) resistance training [RT]. A randomized controlled cluster trial across 15 sites was employed. The outcomes were muscle cross sectional area (CSA) of the upper arm and thigh, and strength for chest press, leg press, and pulldown. Pre-testing preceded randomization to either the lpROM (<i>n</i> = 163) or fROM (<i>n</i> = 134) RT condition. Post-testing was completed following a 12-week intervention. Our primary estimand of interest was the condition by time interaction. The estimate for this effect for arm estimated muscle CSA was -0.032 and for thigh estimated muscle CSA was 0. The <i>p</i>-values for equivalence were <i>p</i> = 0.071 for the arm muscle, and <i>p</i> = 0.019 for the thigh muscle. Inference criteria with alpha were set at 0.01 and adjusted to 0.005 for multiple outcomes, as such, we were unable to reject the null hypothesis that the condition:time interaction effect was outside of the SESOI [-0.1, 0.1]. Exploratory analysis suggests that both the main effects of time, and any interaction effects for condition by time, are likely small. These findings support previous evidence comparing fROM and lpROM specifically and suggest that between condition effects are small and practically equivalent.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2567805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project represents a highly powered pre-registered comparison of full ROM (fROM) and 'lengthened partial' ROM (lpROM) resistance training [RT]. A randomized controlled cluster trial across 15 sites was employed. The outcomes were muscle cross sectional area (CSA) of the upper arm and thigh, and strength for chest press, leg press, and pulldown. Pre-testing preceded randomization to either the lpROM (n = 163) or fROM (n = 134) RT condition. Post-testing was completed following a 12-week intervention. Our primary estimand of interest was the condition by time interaction. The estimate for this effect for arm estimated muscle CSA was -0.032 and for thigh estimated muscle CSA was 0. The p-values for equivalence were p = 0.071 for the arm muscle, and p = 0.019 for the thigh muscle. Inference criteria with alpha were set at 0.01 and adjusted to 0.005 for multiple outcomes, as such, we were unable to reject the null hypothesis that the condition:time interaction effect was outside of the SESOI [-0.1, 0.1]. Exploratory analysis suggests that both the main effects of time, and any interaction effects for condition by time, are likely small. These findings support previous evidence comparing fROM and lpROM specifically and suggest that between condition effects are small and practically equivalent.

延长部分运动范围的肢体阻力训练对手臂和大腿肌肉区域的影响:一项多地点随机试验。
该项目代表了全ROM (fROM)和“加长部分”ROM (lpROM)阻力训练[RT]的高功率预注册比较。采用15个地点的随机对照群集试验。结果是上臂和大腿的肌肉横截面积(CSA),以及胸压、腿压和下拉的力量。在随机分配到lpROM (n = 163)或fROM (n = 134) RT条件之前进行预测试。干预12周后完成后测。我们感兴趣的主要估计是时间相互作用的条件。该效应对手臂肌肉CSA的估计为-0.032,对大腿肌肉CSA的估计为0。手臂肌肉的等效p值为p = 0.071,大腿肌肉的等效p值为p = 0.019。对于多个结果,将alpha的推断标准设置为0.01,并调整为0.005,因此,我们无法拒绝原假设,即时间相互作用效应在SESOI之外[-0.1,0.1]。探索性分析表明,时间的主要影响和时间对病情的任何交互影响都可能很小。这些发现支持了先前比较fROM和lpROM的证据,并表明条件之间的影响很小,实际上是相等的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信